Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Allsnow said:

No reason to buy into cold and snow as it hasn’t shown up this winter. We have been looking at the same medium range maps all season. You have said this all winter. Don’t buy into this 

You never know. Even a broken clock is right twice a day.  Something has to break. We watch it for the next couple of days for trends. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, hudsonvalley21 said:

You never know. Even a broken clock is right twice a day.  Something has to break. We watch it for the next couple of days for trends. 

Nothing to lose.  If it fizzles, we're back in the same snowless spot lol.  At least it's something to look at and makes things somewhat interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Allsnow said:

No reason to buy into cold and snow as it hasn’t shown up this winter. We have been looking at the same medium range maps all season. You have said this all winter. Don’t buy into this 

You're making a good point that can't be ignored. The models' cold bias is important to keep in mind. However, there's one key difference ahead that we haven't seen so far this winter: we now have the unpredictability of the sometimes favorable aftermath of a major SSW to consider. And this is looking to be a solid major with the latest GFS prediction of a -15 m/s 10 mb 60N mean wind now being predicted. While not near the record strongest, which is well down into the -20s, a -15 is no slouch and probably is stronger than the average major SSW by that measure.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No reason to buy into cold and snow as it hasn’t shown up this winter. We have been looking at the same medium range maps all season. You have said this all winter. Don’t buy into this 

Different night, same ending. Seen this movie before and we know how it ends. That gradient is going to end up in New England next week. Massive full-latitude trough digging for gold in Baja and a SE ridge that you know will trend stronger as we get closer. Same old overpowering RNA that’s been there since November, same old pattern. And no, I don’t buy the 50/50 vortex being as strong as depicted either without a true west based -NAO block locking it in, seen that nonsense from the models before this year as well
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're making a good point that can't be ignored. The models' cold bias is important to keep in mind. However, there's one key difference ahead that we haven't seen so far this winter: we now have the unpredictability of the sometimes favorable aftermath of a major SSW to consider. And this is looking to be a solid major with the latest GFS prediction of a -15 m/s 10 mb 60N mean wind now being predicted. While not near the record strongest, which is well down into the -20s, a -15 is no slouch and probably is stronger than the average major SSW by that measure.

My questions are, how do we know it definitely downwells and couples with the troposphere? If it does, which side of the pole does it benefit? What does it actually do to the SPV? How long does it take to have tropospheric effects if any? This event is nothing like 2018. If we are to take the study Dr. Amy Butler shared, given when this SSWE happens, then we factor in the lag time, we are looking at mid-late March for the tropospheric -NAM (-AO) and -NAO to take effect, if that’s the case, it may be all for naught
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This winter has sucked and persistence has won out however this upcoming period may be different. This is the first time I've noticed the se ridge get knocked down this close. 
New run
image.thumb.png.8d0b65f5ed3f20e59b7a40fc98effd40.png
Old run
image.thumb.png.4fef84154ea7506e62d7e3d0b26b4675.png

I’ve seen it before. The models have been doing it since November. They show a knocked down SE ridge/WAR in the mid-long range only for it to verify much stronger as we move forward in time
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, snowman19 said:


I’ve seen it before. The models have been doing it since November. They show a knocked down SE ridge/WAR in the mid-long range only for it to verify much stronger as we move forward in time

Yea I hear you but this time it's across all guidance and gaining traction as we get closer. It's not fantasy land. Now whether it snows is a different story 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tomorrow will unseasonably warm. Readings will likely reach the lower and even middle 60s across the Mid-Atlantic region.

Temperatures will run generally above to much above normal through the third week of February. Afterward, temperatures could cool during the closing 7 days of the month. That could afford an opportunity for a rare (for this winter) snowfall in the Mid-Atlantic region during the February 22-24 timeframe. More than likely, any snowfall would be modest. No severe shots of cold appear likely through February.

Among the extended range scenarios on the table is a late February-early March 2002-type outcome. Under such a scenario, cold air would flood into the Plains States, but persistent southeast ridging would keep most of the cold away from the northeastern and Mid-Atlantic United States.

During February 28-March 5, 2002 high temperatures in the New York City area generally reached the lower to middle 40s with low temperatures in the 20s at night. At the height of the cold, one night saw the temperature fall into the upper teens. By March 7, the cold was gone and readings return to much above normal levels.

The ENSO Region 1+2 anomaly was +0.7°C and the Region 3.4 anomaly was -0.5°C for the week centered around February 8. For the past six weeks, the ENSO Region 1+2 anomaly has averaged -0.12°C and the ENSO Region 3.4 anomaly has averaged -0.62°C. La Niña conditions fading and they should evolve to neutral conditions during late winter or early spring.

The SOI was +15.23 today.

The preliminary Arctic Oscillation (AO) was +1.259 today.

On February 12 the MJO was in Phase 6 at an amplitude of 2.342 (RMM). The February 11-adjusted amplitude was 2.076 (RMM).

Based on sensitivity analysis applied to the latest guidance, there is an implied 97% probability that New York City will have a warmer than normal February (1991-2020 normal). February will likely finish with a mean temperature near 40.6° (4.7° above normal).

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we take the EPS at face value and assume it’s even correct, a true -NAO doesn’t start developing until 3/1. So next week, besides the very strong -PNA and the SE ridge that we know is going to verify stronger than what it is being shown now, what’s to stop the 50/50 low and the associated confluence from simply sliding east out into the Atlantic? Where’s the -NAO block? Fact is there is no -NAO block next week to trap a 50/50 low, even if it’s as strong as what’s being depicted, which is most likely wrong. I think we can all imagine where this is headed

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, JustinRP37 said:

Yeah they were mentioning that those with hotel reservations for the cherry blossoms in DC might want to bump their visit up. Truly insane. 

White Plains is currently in 3rd place for warmest winter with  Poughkeepsie in 4th. Danbury is in 1st place for warmest with a period of record starting there in 98-99. Only the 4th winter when Caribou averaged over 20°. BTV is 3rd warmest at nearly 30°. You can see how many top ranking warmest winters there have been since the 15-16 super El Niño. So very close tracking between the interior Northeast and coastal plain. 
 

Equivalent benchmarks for warmest across the region

NYC….40°+

HPN…..36°+

POU…..34°+

DXR…...34°+

CAR……19°+

BTV……27°+

 

Time Series Summary for WESTCHESTER CO AP, NY - Dec through Feb
Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending.
Rank
Season
Mean Avg Temperature 
Missing Count
1 2015-2016 37.2 0
- 2001-2002 37.2 0
2 2011-2012 37.1 1
3 2022-2023 36.8 15
4 1997-1998 36.6 25
5 2016-2017 36.1 1
6 2019-2020 35.7 3
7 1998-1999 35.1 25
- 1990-1991 35.1 8
8 1996-1997 34.8 32
9 1952-1953 34.4 0
10 2012-2013 33.8 0


 

Time Series Summary for Poughkeepsie Area, NY (ThreadEx) - Dec through Feb
Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending.
Rank
Season
Mean Avg Temperature 
Missing Count
1 2015-2016 36.8 0
2 1931-1932 35.2 7
3 2011-2012 34.8 1
4 2022-2023 34.3 15
- 2001-2002 34.3 0
5 1932-1933 34.1 8
6 1936-1937 33.8 2
7 2019-2020 33.0 0
- 1997-1998 33.0 2
8 1996-1997 32.8 2
9 2016-2017 32.6 0
10 1952-1953 32.2 0



 

Time Series Summary for DANBURY MUNICIPAL AP, CT - Dec through Feb
Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending.
Rank
Season
Mean Avg Temperature 
Missing Count
1 2022-2023 36.3 15
2 2015-2016 35.1 0
3 2001-2002 34.7 0
4 2011-2012 34.6 1
5 2021-2022 33.1 0


 

Time Series Summary for Caribou Area, ME (ThreadEx) - Dec through Feb
Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending.
Rank
Season
Mean Avg Temperature 
Missing Count
1 2015-2016 21.6 0
2 2009-2010 21.0 0
3 2020-2021 20.8 0
4 2022-2023 20.7 15
5 2001-2002 19.3 0
6 2019-2020 17.9 0
7 1959-1960 17.7 0
8 2011-2012 17.6 0
- 2010-2011 17.6 0
- 1957-1958 17.6 0
9 1982-1983 17.5 0
10 2005-2006 17.3 0


 

Time Series Summary for Burlington Area, VT (ThreadEx) - Dec through Feb
Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending.
Rank
Season
Mean Avg Temperature 
Missing Count
1 2015-2016 30.2 0
2 2016-2017 29.5 0
3 2022-2023 29.4 15
4 2001-2002 28.8 0
5 2011-2012 27.8 0
6 1932-1933 27.6 0
- 1905-1906 27.6 1
7 1936-1937 26.3 0
8 2019-2020 26.1 0
9 1931-1932 26.0 0
10 1948-1949 25.9 0
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, snowman19 said:


My questions are, how do we know it definitely downwells and couples with the troposphere? If it does, which side of the pole does it benefit? What does it actually do to the SPV? How long does it take to have tropospheric effects if any? This event is nothing like 2018. If we are to take the study Dr. Amy Butler shared, given when this SSWE happens, then we factor in the lag time, we are looking at mid-late March for the tropospheric -NAM (-AO) and -NAO to take effect, if that’s the case, it may be all for naught

Great questions:

1. We don't know if it will downwell. However, last week there was a S-G dipole max above 40 mb, which per Dr. Simon Lee, is a positive indicator for it to go down into the troposphere. And the models are suggesting a -NAO in two weeks.

2. Nobody knows the specifics on which areas of the world would be affected the most if it downwells. But if the -NAO that models are hinting at starting in two weeks actually occurs, that would obviously bode well for chances for cold in the E US.

3. The timing varies with each SSW but effects including an -NAO/-AO often start within 1.5-2 weeks of the SSW date, which would be either very late Feb or very early March. So, imho, IF there is to be a colder pattern from this, it would very likely start earlier than mid to late March.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, JustinRP37 said:

This is the most surreal winter I have ever lived through. It is actually pretty scary if you pay attention to the ecological signs. We may see record early leaf out this year. Not to mention the continued spread of invasives north. 

with all the toxic chemical spills going on, humanity is doing a lot of things wrong on this planet.

Instead of looking for intelligent life elsewhere in the universe, we need to wonder whether it even exists on earth.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...