Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,607
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

2023 Short/Medium Range Severe Weather Discussion


Chicago Storm
 Share

Recommended Posts

You can put it on the board.... yes.  Without double checking, I'd be pretty confident about this being the earliest day in the calendar year for a tornado in the LOT cwa.

 

PRELIMINARY LOCAL STORM REPORT
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE CHICAGO IL
924 PM CST TUE JAN 3 2023

..TIME...   ...EVENT...      ...CITY LOCATION...     ...LAT.LON...
..DATE...   ....MAG....      ..COUNTY LOCATION..ST.. ...SOURCE....
            ..REMARKS..

0559 PM     TORNADO          3 SSE GIBSON CITY       40.43N 88.35W
01/03/2023                   FORD               IL   EMERGENCY MNGR

            PHOTO SHARED VIA LOCAL BROADCAST MEDIA SHOWS
            A TORNADO SOUTHEAST OF GIBSON CITY. FORD
            COUNTY EM CONFIRMS TWO HOMESTEADS SOUTHEAST
            OF GIBSON CITY SUSTAINED DAMAGE FROM THIS
            TORNADO. POWER LINES WERE ALSO DOWNED IN THE
            AREA. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WILL BE MADE
            AVAILABLE AT SOME POINT TOMORROW.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

January 3rd was one of my best storm chases ever! I saw multiple tornadoes, and got within 100 meters of the EF1 tornado that went through Maroa, IL. I also witnessed an anticyclonic funnel, as well as beautiful winter mini supercell structure. The lightning was great too! I love these Illinois troll days.

 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

It'll be game on if the HRRR verifies with the higher dewpoints, as it generates a respectable amount of CAPE with those still relatively modest dews.  That is a big if though.

I'd break it down into 3 scenarios.

1) The HRRR verifies, which would lead to a decent severe threat for this time of year

2) The other guidance with lower dews verifies, resulting in essentially no severe threat

3) Something somewhere in between the HRRR and other models verifies, which could lead to a rogue severe report or two

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, MNstorms said:

Didn't expect this. First time Minnesota, Wisconsin, or Iowa has had a January severe risk. Minnesota has never had a January or February tornado or even a warning for severe. It will be interesting to see if the low chance happens.

month:jan::p:1.C.13::level:CATEGORICAL.MJ4Q0Xlf.gif

Considering the data for marginal risk areas is only limited to when it debuted in late 2014, I'm not sure how accurate that point this.

I suspect if one did some more digging, MN / WI / IA at least had a "SEE TEXT" at some point in the past during January or February.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

DMX not entirely sold:

 

Quote
The HRRR and RAP solutions regarding instability on Monday have been
all the rage on social media since their domains reached that
period. Both are anomalously high on dew point temperatures with
values in the low to mid 50s into central Iowa and both tend to over
mix the boundary layer during stratus events. Other solutions are
more conservative on both temperatures and dew points and do not
overcome the warm wedge aloft. Sounding wind profiles do have
direction shear below 900 mb but whether that shear is acting on
surface based instability certainly is questionable. January
tornadoes have occurred on only one day in Iowa recorded history,
January 24, 1967 when 13 tornadoes occurred over the southeast
portion of the state. That event was followed up by a blizzard
with record snow accumulations over the state, thus a very strong
system. It often takes a historical type system such as Dec 15,
2021 when nearly 80 kts of flow was at 850 mb or below. The
majority of the time, stratus wins which leads to non- events. As
always, will need to monitor trends and will have a great
opportunity to do that over the next 24 hrs as the low matures and
we can get a better handle on how much moisture will reach the
state.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, CheeselandSkies said:

Like last night's 00Z, the 3KM CAPE on the 12Z HRRR is...noteworthy.

Pretty much sticking to its guns.  18z run will be interesting to see if it backs off at all. 

In this setup, it's gonna make a difference whether dews are in the upper 40s vs like 53.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They did remove the marginal risk on the updated day 2 outlook.  I figured it would've been left in place for continuity purposes even with all the uncertainty.  Can debate whether a marginal risk should've been outlined on the first day 2 outlook, but it's not like the 12z runs were the thing to lower the threat.  Each model essentially stuck to its guns.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The marginal risk has returned.

 

...Eastern IA and northwest IL...
   Favorable wind profiles for low-topped supercells will be present in
   the southeast quadrant of a 994-mb surface cyclone tracking from
   southwest to northeast IA. Surface temperatures have warmed into the
   mid 50s to low 60s in a confined corridor centered on LWD-CDJ before
   broadening across central MO, with relatively ample insolation
   beneath the mid-level dry slot. The 12Z NAM and most HREF members
   appear much too cool within the thermal axis compared to 16Z
   observations. The RAP/HRRR-based guidance appear closer to reality
   but may be a bit too moist given an even narrower corridor of low
   50s surface dew points from southwest to north-central MO. But
   further mixing and poleward moisture advection may be just enough,
   given the mid-level cold pocket of -22 to -24 C at 500 mb, to
   support meager MLCAPE approaching 500 J/kg towards mid-afternoon.
   While it is plausible that convection may fail to adequately
   intensify this afternoon, observational trends along with HRRR/RRFS
   guidance suggest the threat for a couple brief tornadoes and
   marginally severe hail is large enough to warrant low severe
   probabilities. Convection will subside quickly after sunset as it
   outpaces the narrow plume of weak surface-based instability. 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the NAM/GFS ever had dews in the 50s in Iowa.  There's at least a narrow corridor of that at present. 

Scenario 3 that I outlined may be most plausible one at this point

 

On 1/15/2023 at 12:04 AM, Hoosier said:

It'll be game on if the HRRR verifies with the higher dewpoints, as it generates a respectable amount of CAPE with those still relatively modest dews.  That is a big if though.

I'd break it down into 3 scenarios.

1) The HRRR verifies, which would lead to a decent severe threat for this time of year

2) The other guidance with lower dews verifies, resulting in essentially no severe threat

3) Something somewhere in between the HRRR and other models verifies, which could lead to a rogue severe report or two

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...