Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,586
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Dec 27th Miller B nor’easter threat


George001
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, George001 said:

I’m not buying the gfs at all because it has the ridge rolling over. I could be wrong but I’m sticking to my guns, I’m convinced we see a drastic shift west on all guidance in 2-3 days. I’m all in on this threat, and plan to make a snow forecast tomorrow for this Miller B nor’easter/blizzard threat.

To quote Ronald Reagan....there you go again......

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

Euro is still semi-interesting. Enough to not pull the life-support plug yet. But it's still a long shot.

yeah I wouldn't kick the can on this one yet, but it'll be tough

totally sucks that this coming storm is going to be a day too early and this one likely a day too late. worst possible timing for both

ecmwf-deterministic-conus-vort500_z500-2131600.png

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

You can see the ridge getting the top sliced off of it out west.....if we had that more amped, then we'd prob see a decent coastal system out of that trough....with the potential to phase in some of that PV energy.

If if if....I remember the old saying I'd hear my parents say..."balls said the queen, if I had them I'd be king"

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

You can see the ridge getting the top sliced off of it out west.....if we had that more amped, then we'd prob see a decent coastal system out of that trough....with the potential to phase in some of that PV energy.

At hr 126 it looks really interesting, 12 hrs later it starts to get decapitated lol.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CoastalWx said:

At hr 126 it looks really interesting, 12 hrs later it starts to get decapitated lol.

Ahh well…it was interesting for a day or two, just like this current one was. C

 

an’t seem to put anything together at all so far.  Always something to muck it up. 
 

Bye Bye to this one too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WinterWolf said:

Ahh well…it was interesting for a day or two, just like this current one was. C

 

an’t seem to put anything together at all so far.  Always something to muck it up. 
 

Bye Bye to this one too. 

This one was never more than a long shot.  I mean CMC gave a moderate storm for a few days.  As others have implied, shoveling fake cmc snow gets old.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, WinterWolf said:

Ahh well…it was interesting for a day or two, just like this current one was. C

 

an’t seem to put anything together at all so far.  Always something to muck it up. 
 

Bye Bye to this one too. 

i mean... you can know that something is unlikely but still holds some potential, so you can keep an eye on it while not expecting anything

that's the correct course of action here. probably not anything, but it's 5-6 days out and the pieces are there, so why not keep tabs on it. who knows. we've seen storms pop up from nothing in the 3-5 day range before and this is a highly amplified, blocky pattern

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, brooklynwx99 said:

i mean... you can know that something is unlikely but still holds some potential, so you can keep an eye on it while not expecting anything

that's the correct course of action here. probably not anything, but it's 5-6 days out and the pieces are there, so why not keep tabs on it. who knows. we've seen storms pop up from nothing in the 3-5 day range before and this is a highly amplified, blocky pattern

Yeah this is the view I'm taking on this. Unlikely to occur, but there's enough potential that keep half an eye on it and see if the ridge improves a bit or the spacing between the main shortwave and the PV.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, brooklynwx99 said:

i mean... you can know that something is unlikely but still holds some potential, so you can keep an eye on it while not expecting anything

that's the correct course of action here. probably not anything, but it's 5-6 days out and the pieces are there, so why not keep tabs on it. who knows. we've seen storms pop up from nothing in the 3-5 day range before and this is a highly amplified, blocky pattern

I absolutely agree. And we should keep half an eye on it, and I know we will.
 

But we just can’t seem to catch a break lately…most everything that has “a chance”( whether a long shot or otherwise) can’t seem to make it into the shorter range with some improving trends.  The legs(no matter how short/small) get chopped out from under it before there’s a chance for it to get any closer than 6-7 days.  
 

Discouraging start to the season to say the least. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, George001 said:

I’m not buying the gfs at all because it has the ridge rolling over. I could be wrong but I’m sticking to my guns, I’m convinced we see a drastic shift west on all guidance in 2-3 days. I’m all in on this threat, and plan to make a snow forecast tomorrow for this Miller B nor’easter/blizzard threat.

JFC George. STOP with the blizzard bullshit please.

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

Yeah this is the view I'm taking on this. Unlikely to occur, but there's enough potential that keep half an eye on it and see if the ridge improves a bit or the spacing between the main shortwave and the PV.

it is interesting how the EPS still maintains some very strong members off the EC... I'm assuming these were able to phase with the TPV

obviously a low chance of this, but I wish I could see how these members pull this off to see what to look for in future runs. seems very all-or-nothing

ecmwf-ensemble-avg-east-mslp_with_low_locs-1671624000-1672164000-1672250400-100.thumb.gif.d86461ac2b4dfc4ac0e2ebf99117ddaa.gif

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, weathafella said:

This one was never more than a long shot.  I mean CMC gave a moderate storm for a few days.  As others have implied, shoveling fake cmc snow gets old.

But the CMC nailed the non blizzard, though...we knew that would happen because it entailed all of us bending over and grabbing our collective ankles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, UnitedWx said:

Well.... he thought he was onto something. I am not going to make an issue of a fellow forum members youth and inexperience :D

Nothing has changed, I still believe in this threat. I am convinced the amplified pattern will not allow the ridge to roll over. If anything, my confidence in this threat has increased over the past couple of days. The h5 looks great.

  • Weenie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, George001 said:

Nothing has changed, I still believe in this threat. I am convinced the amplified pattern will not allow the ridge to roll over. If anything, my confidence in this threat has increased over the past couple of days. The h5 looks great.

Way to Stick by your convictions.  But That H5 look is a modeled look that may,  or may not be correct as well.  Keep that in mind.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SJonesWX said:

JFC George. STOP with the blizzard bullshit please.

Obviously it’s not a guarantee, but the blizzard talk isn’t “bullshit”. If the ridge doesn’t roll over, that would allow the intense northern energy phase with the southern energy. This setup has a strong high to to the north, the contrast between the high and low pressure if the storm phases would lead to intense winds as well as heavy snow. There absolutely is blizzard potential if things come together for this threat.

  • Haha 1
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, weathafella said:

I thought h5 looked like warmed over dogshit tbh.

image.thumb.png.1ba07500c81a7b88acbe02ef95489d6f.pngPositive PNA, weakening negative NAO, northern energy diving down and the TPV in eastern Canada. Yeah it would be nice to see that blue near Alaska a bit more west, but overall I thought this looked great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...