Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,607
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

January 2023 Obs/Discussion


Torch Tiger
 Share

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, weathafella said:

Forget pack this year.

Yup. All about numbers on the board. 

20 minutes ago, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said:

No changes, to our thoughts. It’s coming. The upswing is near…

That's why I feel the football analogy is so good (at least in my mind) if we can get a late week score, even if it isn't a TD, it inspires confidence in at least a modest comeback. Let's string together a couple good drives...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, powderfreak said:

Yeah I guess that was my takeaway, that you need cold air originally to dam it in.  CAD usually requires cold to begin with.

There are really two ways I like to think of it, active or passive (in-situ) CAD.

Active you either can get a backdoor of sorts to drive the cold south along the terrain, or the pressure gradient is oriented just so as to produce that barrier jet that holds the cold in place.

In-situ CAD you wet bulb down below freezing thanks to a dry air mass and the cold just takes a long time to scour out, but eventually does because there is no barrier jet. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WxWatcher007 said:

Yup. All about numbers on the board. 

That's why I feel the football analogy is so good (at least in my mind) if we can get a late week score, even if it isn't a TD, it inspires confidence in at least a modest comeback. Let's string together a couple good drives...

The only difference with weather is, you can still comeback by whining. 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, OceanStWx said:

There are really two ways I like to think of it, active or passive (in-situ) CAD.

Active you either can get a backdoor of sorts to drive the cold south along the terrain, or the pressure gradient is oriented just so as to produce that barrier jet that holds the cold in place.

In-situ CAD you wet bulb down below freezing thanks to a dry air mass and the cold just takes a long time to scour out, but eventually does because there is no barrier jet. 

And you almost always need active for a major icing event (say, greater than 3/8th radial)…though you can maybe get close if the low level antecedent airmass is extremely good, but that’s kind of hard to do without having a lot of sleet and snow contamination eating up QPF on the front end…which then by default means less QPF as ZR. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ORH_wxman said:

And you almost always need active for a major icing event (say, greater than 3/8th radial)…though you can maybe get close if the low level antecedent airmass is extremely good, but that’s kind of hard to do without having a lot of sleet and snow contamination eating up QPF on the front end…which then by default means less QPF as ZR. 
 

The only one that really jumps out at me with 0.5" radial on just in-situ cold air was the late 90s that started below zero but ended up 50s and thunder later in the afternoon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the new WPC stuff, snow probs moderate to just south of the NH border, and high near to Laconia on north.  But a "modest" event (3-6 here perhaps).  I didn't realize the 23rd was a Miller A, but it comes all the way up the coast, perhaps just inside the BM.  But the low is modest as well in this depiction, only 1000mb just ne of the BM at 12Z 23rd.  Doesn't seem like anything exciting, but is there another behind this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mahk_webstah said:

Looking at the new WPC stuff, snow probs moderate to just south of the NH border, and high near to Laconia on north.  But a "modest" event (3-6 here perhaps).  I didn't realize the 23rd was a Miller A, but it comes all the way up the coast, perhaps just inside the BM.  But the low is modest as well in this depiction, only 1000mb just ne of the BM at 12Z 23rd.  Doesn't seem like anything exciting, but is there another behind this?

In a gradient pattern nothing is specially exciting but there are lots of opportunities depending on which side of the gradient you are.  We haven’t lacked action the past 4-6 weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mahk_webstah said:

Looking at the new WPC stuff, snow probs moderate to just south of the NH border, and high near to Laconia on north.  But a "modest" event (3-6 here perhaps).  I didn't realize the 23rd was a Miller A, but it comes all the way up the coast, perhaps just inside the BM.  But the low is modest as well in this depiction, only 1000mb just ne of the BM at 12Z 23rd.  Doesn't seem like anything exciting, but is there another behind this?

With what we've been given so far this season... This looks exciting! 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, weathafella said:

In a gradient pattern nothing is specially exciting but there are lots of opportunities depending on which side of the gradient you are.  We haven’t lacked action the past 4-6 weeks.

More like we haven’t lacked rain. 9 of them since the last snowfall.. well prior to your snowfall last nite 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, OceanStWx said:

The only one that really jumps out at me with 0.5" radial on just in-situ cold air was the late 90s that started below zero but ended up 50s and thunder later in the afternoon.

Was that Jan ‘99? I think that one had temps ridiculously cold at the onset. Trying to think of some ice storms from back then…obv it wasn’t Jan ‘98…and I can’t remember any other ones…Feb 14, 1997 was kind of big in ORH. But we didn’t have a half inch radial ice in that one. Maybe a quarter inch which is still pretty good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ORH_wxman said:

Was that Jan ‘99? I think that one had temps ridiculously cold at the onset. Trying to think of some ice storms from back then…obv it wasn’t Jan ‘98…and I can’t remember any other ones…Feb 14, 1997 was kind of big in ORH. But we didn’t have a half inch radial ice in that one. Maybe a quarter inch which is still pretty good. 

I think that's the one.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dendrite said:

The warm layer is at 700mb. But yeah, toss that for now. The H7 low starts closing off over DC and heads over ACK yet ramps the WAA way up to EEN.

Well ...that explains the sleet contamination better than - but we both agree it's not likely right.

Also, the BL ...the model does tend to saturate/wet-bulb higher than most other guidance in the mid range.  I see this a lot with the GGEM

   ( and the only reason I bother to discuss is because the GGEM's been through some upgrades over the last 2 years and it has been showing somewhat improved performance...)

 where it places the rain/snow transition around -2 or -3 C at 850mb ... within a pounding CCB head.  Nnnno

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Euro's agreeing now with the GGEM/GFS re the 'quasi' norlun IVT lagging with persistent light snow on Friday.

I suggest a thread... this specter has been coherent for enough runs.  I told Will I'd do one by last night but I have other discussion obligation that took me off it.  

I'll put one up for moderate risk for (minor+moderate)/2 return

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, jbenedet said:

I'll take the 12z EPS for Thurs./Friday and run with that.

I think western MA/NW CT can work with this. Thursday, it looks a setup where surface temps will stagnate all day near the morning low out 

Warm nose is centered around 850 on the soudnings and gets pretty warm, esp pike south on the 12z stuff. So, I think latitude will be in play too, and of course things could always shift always back north some. The 850 0 line, along with sfc Ts are probably a good approx R/S line for this one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, wx2fish said:

Warm nose is centered around 850 on the soudnings and gets pretty warm, esp pike south on the 12z stuff. So, I think latitude will be in play too, and of course things could always shift always back north some. The 850 0 line, along with sfc Ts are probably a good approx R/S line for this one. 

Yea I def see that risk, but there isn't a low level WAA signal either. So my thinking is areas west with dews around freezing can quickly cool the column within few hours of precip onset.  

Which again is why this isn't an ice threat - more of a rain/snow deal.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...