Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

"We're gonna need a bigger plow..." Massive, persistent singal now emerges discretely in the models, 20th-23rd


Typhoon Tip
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

We'd probably be better off losing the PNA ridge all together if it isn't going to shift east. It acts to trigger phasing further west.

Yes. It would prob be an overrunning or SWFE if we sent the whole thing in flatter and didn’t allow it to dig for oil in the plains. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting how little the overnight various sources did to resolve differences among the various sources. 

For starters, at just 156 hours (~) lead left to go before amplitude time, to see the entire GEFs suite that much different than the EPS ...ranging from mean and spreads astride the EC, to full southerly blown Lakes cutter, not personally sure that's very normal.  156 hours is right on the cusp of 'not so far out there' vs acceptable variance so.  

Whether one gets the model cinema and d-drip they are looking for out of these runs today ( lol ), there will certainly be some value in the mystery in its own rights.  

The operational runs more than less are within their ensemble clusters. No help there.  

GFS has ICON model on it's side - but having read how/why the ICON model got its name/technology therein, I'm not sure that's just a coincidence.  No help there.

This is a great chess match.  On one side... we snow --> mix --> rain --> snow, windy coastal bomb that rides either just west of the I-95 corridor, or if the ~ 1/3 of the GEFs seaward members are right ... a humdinger with more snow rides east of that track.   On the other side, the air mass out ahead turns around and bodily moves out with no cryo entry...it just sort of matures from whatever we deal with after today's morass, into tea-time with Grinch. 

There will be a winner, and a loser - ....  lol,  ah HA!  the NAVGEM splits the difference almost precisely looking at the mass-field in and around the event.  That's amost comical, that the course of lesser regret in this situation, the compromise, is right where that particular model depicts its synoptic evolution.   Again...given to that model's history and the fact that it's not really supposed to be used for this sort of analysis over land ( per it's creators).  No help there.  

All the while, a huge signal is still there for a event, and at least that much of this is higher confidence. 

Just some morning musings... I could almost see this devolving - though - from a big one to perhaps two more moderate events ( with upside), spread out.   The NAO is weakening it's negative grip in the numerical guide - not sure if that meets with the eye-ball test on the geopotential means/charts...  But, with a -AO/ rising PNA --> surging +PNAP, the idea of a fast flow does enter the picture.  Fast flow is less physically conducive to bigger singular events...  That may help distribute impulses more than collect them ..etc.  

From what I am seeing of the 00z Euro that really differentiates its overall handling out there is that it is sagging the western end of the SPV draped across southern Canada, into the Pac S/W as it slides by heading SE...and this induces a subsume phase, which torques up and breaks earlier across the continent.  It's really outpacing the +PNAP, or is right on top of it in space and time.  The GFS appears to keep these streams more separate, as does it's little buddy the ICON, and it's system ends up less wound up ( albeit still potent) farther east.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

There will be a winner, and a loser - ....  lol,  ah HA!  the NAVGEM splits the difference almost precisely looking at the mass-field in and around the event.

Bad news for the GFS

I do think you make a valid point though, how often have we seen destructive interference kick a would-be bomb out east leading up to go time? Could use some of that here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...