Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

"We're gonna need a bigger plow..." Massive, persistent singal now emerges discretely in the models, 20th-23rd


Typhoon Tip
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, wxsniss said:

Both 18z and 0z GFS had this feature, hence the more disjointed cyclogenesis

12z GFS did not, and cyclogenesis was entirely focused at the monster digging shortwave

But as Tip said, it’s a 963mb storm on that run…can’t be too disjointed if it’s ending up at that strength.  

The ensembles(GEFS) look nice…that’s where we focus at this stage. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said:

Don’t sweat op runs but it’s this:

 

02A3DACB-F3A8-403E-AB32-B4FC41CD0615.jpeg

That’s a lot of energy, I’d even keep an eye on the piece way off to the right (on this run it’s too far east, but plenty of time for that to change). If as the trough goes negative it is able to pull that back into the main storm, we could see one big low instead of 2 or 3 lows. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

EPS looks better than the op.  Still spread though so we'll see.  The mean suggests somewhat of a hugger with 925 mean temps problematic east of 95.  But way better vs op.  A lot of time left for this strong signal but across all ensembles there's excellent consensus that we're getting a sizable event.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, weathafella said:

EPS looks better than the op.  Still spread though so we'll see.  The mean suggests somewhat of a hugger with 925 mean temps problematic east of 95.  But way better vs op.  A lot of time left for this strong signal but across all ensembles there's excellent consensus that we're getting a sizable event.

Alright we can work with that, I figured the EPS would be terrible considering how inland the Euro was. It looks like the risk is more inland runner than OTS, but the setup still looks better than the one for the rainstorm going on right now in eastern areas. Just gotta get that low east of us. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, weathafella said:

EPS looks better than the op.  Still spread though so we'll see.  The mean suggests somewhat of a hugger with 925 mean temps problematic east of 95.  But way better vs op.  A lot of time left for this strong signal but across all ensembles there's excellent consensus that we're getting a sizable event.

Yep, telleconnecter convergence is no joke

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's make sure we stress over run-to-run fluctuations for a storm occurring 8 days from now. If we don't do that, we'll never earn snow from the universe! Because we all know that in order to enjoy life, you have to suffer gratuitously on the front end through anticipatory anxiety over uncontrollable shit before anything good happens. And, of course, because the universe cares about how we feel about things.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Henry's Weather said:

Let's make sure we stress over run-to-run fluctuations for a storm occurring 8 days from now. If we don't do that, we'll never earn snow from the universe! Because we all know that in order to enjoy life, you have to suffer gratuitously on the front end through anticipatory anxiety over uncontrollable shit before anything good happens. And, of course, because the universe cares about how we feel about things.

Did you even check the calendar before posting this? Of course the universe cares.

 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Torch Tiger said:

Still looking huggy/cuttery this AM.

Looking at all 3 most recent runs ( GFS, Euro, GEM )... Not sure what you mean about cuttery? All show the storm of the coast ( yes... Closer into the coast on 2 and a little further out on another ). 

Still a great look and signal for next week.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...