Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,607
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Central PA Winter 2022/2023


 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, MAG5035 said:

I wouldn’t say it’s progressive, we really shorten the wavelengths in this period and we have Canadian ridging that allows this to undercut, and potentially even cut off. I think the big problem we’re going to come across with this potential system is going to be temps, something I’ve alluded to the other night in my post about the pattern during this timeframe. The 500mb feature positioning looks great for us considering the shortened wavelengths.

12z Euro v GFS height anomaly

1797523092_ECGFSheights.thumb.png.4a2451cb03fece2485caad327281e004.png

 

Here’s the temp anomaly though for 12z Euro v GFS around the time of this storm being on the coast.

 

The SE is below average because it pulls enough cold down for - anomalies in that region but there’s no anomalous cold to be drawn down from Canada. The result if likely going to be a marginal event if this system comes to fruition. 

 

Thanks for the insight.  I didnt look at 500's, just surface panels, and from what I was seeing up until what you shared above, the 500's had a slight ridge/trough look to them, so I was going off those prior looks.  Yeah this surely shows it closed off, and would arguably pull the trough down as you suggest.  Your point about lack of cold is surely evident on surface panels.  IF this look continues, I'd hope column can cool enough to get it done for some/most in our group.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, MJO812 said:

We really need La Nina to get lost

Its like a hangover that you just cant get rid of. 

Only thing I'd say is that we are only in low end mod, and likely aoa peak, so it wasnt unreasonable to think that things could have broke slightly/notably better for what we've seen so far this winter.  We really did have a couple of ok/decent periods, but they just didnt break in our favor.  To the flip side, and at some point, you cant keep calling it bad luck, and have to rethink your thinking...right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-brightest-gamma-ray-burst-ever-recorded-rattled-earths-atmosphere/

 

 

In early October 2022 a wave of high-energy radiation swept over Earth from a gamma-ray burst, one of the most singularly catastrophic and violent events the cosmos has to offer. Astronomers quickly determined its distance and found it was the closest such burst ever seen: a mere two billion light-years from Earth. Or, if you prefer, 20 billion trillion kilometers away from us, a decent fraction of the size of the observable universe.

To astronomers, “close” means something different. This one was so close, cosmically speaking, that it was detected by a fleet of observatories both on and above Earth, and it is already yielding a trove of scientific treasure. But even from this immense distance in human terms, it was the brightest such event ever seen in x-rays and gamma rays, bright enough for people to spot its visible-light emission in smaller amateur telescopes, and was even able to physically affect our upper atmosphere. Despite that, this gamma-ray burst poses no danger to us. Either way, I’m glad they keep their distance.

Gamma-ray bursts, or GRBs, are intense blasts of gamma rays—the highest-energy form of light—that typically last from a fraction of a second to a few minutes in length. Gamma-ray bursts have been a puzzle to astronomers since the cold war, when the first one was discovered in the 1960s by orbiting detectors looking for nuclear weapons tested on or above Earth. More than 1,700 have been observed since then. Still, it took decades to pin any of them down well enough in the sky to observe them with more conventional telescopes and to understand better what they were. Even then it was difficult, as each GRB has idiosyncrasies, making them complicated to understand as a group.

 

A tweet by astrophysicist Rami Mandow pointed out that lightning detectors in India and Germany showed that the way pulses of electromagnetic radiation from lightning propagated changed suddenly at the same time the GRB energy hit our planet. These pulses indicate conditions in Earth’s upper atmosphere changed, with electrons suddenly stripped from their host atoms. Gamma rays ionize atoms in this way, so it seems very likely that this blast physically affected our planet’s atmosphere, though only mildly and briefly. Still, from two billion light-years away, that’s an extraordinary phenomenon.

A GRB this close means that astronomers can analyze the light they see from it in more ways than usual. Typically a burst’s light isn’t bright enough to clearly reveal details about the event that caused it. This specimen could help scientists better understand the central black hole engine that forms during a burst and the extraordinarily complex nature of the physics surrounding it.

It can also tell us about the Milky Way. The Swift observatory saw expanding rings of x-ray light centered on the GRB’s location, caused by dust clouds in the Milky Way located roughly 600 to 12,000 light-years from Earth. These “light echoes” happen when light hits dust clouds just off our line of sight to the GRB—so we see them to the side, next to the bright point in the sky. Because of the short amount of extra time it takes light from the blast to reach those dust clouds and be scattered toward us, we see rings of light moving outward from the center, their expansion rate related to their distance from us. Measuring these rings allowed astronomers to determine the distances to the clouds.

 
 
 

Although great strides have been made, especially since the 1990s when the first bursts were seen by optical telescopes and their distances were determined to be literally cosmic, there is much about them we have yet to understand. GRB 221009A is still being observed by telescopes around the world, and it may prove to be a Rosetta stone for these wildly diverse, bizarre and powerful events.”

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

0Z Euro has a 996 Low off the Carolina's and it is raining in Canada.  More complicated than this as a day earlier the "parent low" had driven to the Great Lakes and cooked the entire East Coast but if any cold air was available, we may have been able to recover after the transfer to the coast....but not even close on this panel.   That low is off the DelMarVa 48 hours later and much of PA has heavy rain and temps near 60. 

 

 

image.thumb.png.48c7a75a8155b2facc3b423786b0dce5.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Bubbler86 said:

0Z Euro has a 996 Low off the Carolina's and it is raining in Canada.  More complicated than this as a day earlier the "parent low" had driven to the Great Lakes and cooked the entire East Coast but if any cold air was available, we may have been able to recover after the transfer to the coast....but not even close on this panel.   That low is off the DelMarVa 48 hours later and much of PA has heavy rain and temps near 60. 

 

 

image.thumb.png.48c7a75a8155b2facc3b423786b0dce5.png

 

Following all these model runs is like living with some one that's bipolar. We don't know which way it's going anymore. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

0Z Euro has a 996 Low off the Carolina's and it is raining in Canada.  More complicated than this as a day earlier the "parent low" had driven to the Great Lakes and cooked the entire East Coast but if any cold air was available, we may have been able to recover after the transfer to the coast....but not even close on this panel.   That low is off the DelMarVa 48 hours later and much of PA has heavy rain and temps near 60. 
 
 
image.thumb.png.48c7a75a8155b2facc3b423786b0dce5.png
 
I'll take my chances 10/10 in january with a 996 low off the coast of oc MD. If 1 in a 100 it decides to be 69 and raining so be it.

Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Jns2183 said:

I'll take my chances 10/10 in january with a 996 low off the coast of oc MD. If 1 in a 100 it decides to be 69 and raining so be it.

Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
 

Yea, that graphic is perplexing when looking at it in a historical viewpoint.    It is one thing to get mix into SE PA but not Ohio and Canada.    Just no source for a deepening low to drag cold air in from. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, anotherman said:

I am starting to think that this is the most pathetic winter I’ve experienced since I’ve lived in this area. Not even an inch of snow yet and nothing on the horizon. Really sad.

I’m with you.  I’ve been rather inactive posting this winter due to the lack of anything exciting to track.  I had the 3” of snow before Christmas that was washed away 6 hours later.  As psuhoffmam said, even during a bad winter season, we can nickel and dime our way to 20+”.   It’s not looking good for sure.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Cashtown_Coop said:

I’m with you.  I’ve been rather inactive posting this winter due to the lack of anything exciting to track.  I had the 3” of snow before Christmas that was washed away 6 hours later.  As psuhoffmam said, even during a bad winter season, we can nickel and dime our way to 20+”.   It’s not looking good for sure.   

I might snow a little bit tomorrow night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Blizzard of 93 said:

Maybe this Winter will be like 14-15 when we went on a great run from late January through Mid March. There was not much before late January that year.

92-93 set the benchmark for how deep you can get into a terrible winter and still have it be saved and then some.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...