Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,611
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

December 2022 Medium-Long Range Disco


WxUSAF
 Share

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, Bob Chill said:

The ukie only gets attention when it shows snow in the face of everything else. Otherwise, imho, it usually adds confusion and uncertainty instead clearing up gfs/euro divergence. I keep it simple in mid to short range. Euro/gfs blend, hedging towards which one makes the most sense (subjective). Nams are good t add 48 hours in for clearing up qpf/temp details when things are dicey. There are magnitudes more old threads with post storm discussion that says euro/gfs blend was good from 4 days out or whatever. Rarely if ever does the cmc or ukie end up being the best mid range solution. ICON should be ctrl-alt-deleted

Spot on.  I can remember a time when the UK would "preview" what the Euro generally did, or at least that was the speculation here years ago.  It's definitely gone away from that (and of course each setup is different).  You forgot to assess the JMA...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, nj2va said:

Spot on.  I can remember a time when the UK would "preview" what the Euro generally did, or at least that was the speculation here years ago.  It's definitely gone away from that (and of course each setup is different).  You forgot to assess the JMA...

God that’s like the NOGAPS back in the day.. between it and the UKIE with like 60 hrs before the storm they’d be 500 miles southeast of everything else and then all of a sudden magically swing several hundred miles northwest and start to lock in. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here’s how WPC is weighting models for their forecast blend:

The WPC fronts/pressures was primarily based on a 40% ECMWF/20% GFS/20% CMC/20% ECENS blend for Monday and Tuesday, and then the proportion of the ECENS and GEFS means were increased going through the remainder of the week to account for the increasing model uncertainty. Future forecast updates will provide additional clarity on the eventual East Coast storm evolution and potential impacts.”

This was after the 0z suite.

https://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/discussions/hpcdiscussions.php?disc=pmdepd

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SnowLover22 said:

The good news is the differences between the favorable solutions and unfavorable solutions GFS and CMC respectively can be traced back to the shortwave over Alaska at 54 hours. Meaning this model "war" should end relatively soon. One should cave "soon"

Which also means we ain't gotta wait too long on the Euro before we have an idea where this run is gonna go, lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, nj2va said:

Euro and GFS couldn't be more different with how they are handling that NS wave and its within 84 hours.  Someone will be way off in the short range with a key feature.

I'm not big into playing off models or model "camps" on one another, but either the GFS is wrong as shit with that feature or the Euro/CMC/whatever else are.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We basically want that whole area of low 500mb heights to get pulled like taffy, with one big clump moving toward Ontario and the other pinwheeling around it down the Rockies and into the Plains.  0z Euro did that some, although not to the degree the 12z GFS did.  12z euro seems to be stubbornly staying as one big wad.  

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WxUSAF said:

We basically want that whole area of low 500mb heights to get pulled like taffy, with one big clump moving toward Ontario and the other pinwheeling around it down the Rockies and into the Plains.  0z Euro did that some, although not to the degree the 12z GFS did.  12z euro seems to be stubbornly staying as one big wad.  

Careful calling something a big wad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WxUSAF said:

We basically want that whole area of low 500mb heights to get pulled like taffy, with one big clump moving toward Ontario and the other pinwheeling around it down the Rockies and into the Plains.  0z Euro did that some, although not to the degree the 12z GFS did.  12z euro seems to be stubbornly staying as one big wad.  

One big wad....known bias of the euro and nickname to a few posters on here

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WxUSAF said:

We basically want that whole area of low 500mb heights to get pulled like taffy, with one big clump moving toward Ontario and the other pinwheeling around it down the Rockies and into the Plains.  0z Euro did that some, although not to the degree the 12z GFS did.  12z euro seems to be stubbornly staying as one big wad.  

Kind reminds me of cases of phasing in the past, where we had two widely different outcomes depending on if it happens or not. But this is like, in the reverse?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WxUSAF said:

We basically want that whole area of low 500mb heights to get pulled like taffy, with one big clump moving toward Ontario and the other pinwheeling around it down the Rockies and into the Plains.  0z Euro did that some, although not to the degree the 12z GFS did.  12z euro seems to be stubbornly staying as one big wad.  

Yeah we just gonna have to be patient...Ain't no way to know until somebody folds in a couple days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...