Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,199
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    happyclam13
    Newest Member
    happyclam13
    Joined

December 2022 Medium-Long Range Disco


WxUSAF
 Share

Recommended Posts

  On 12/16/2022 at 8:43 PM, Weather Will said:

I am hoping it means that the 18z runs will start converging toward the GFS…

Expand  

the NBM seems to ingest a helluva a lot of data from models I've never even heard of -- but I'm pretty confident its not getting access to future runs/has predictive value for the next cycle. Think this is (unfortunately) just a byproduct of a HECS GFS run being added to the blend. It even has the exact same stripe of max snow totals 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/16/2022 at 8:36 PM, yoda said:

Um, it has? From this afternoons LWX AFD:

 

 

 

Broad, highly anomalous ridging will build into the Arctic, sending

a deep upper low south into the northern Plains, Great Lakes and

Ohio River Valley by Thursday. The collision of this cold upper low

with warmer temperatures near the Gulf Stream will likely generate a

strong area of low pressure in the vicinity of the East Coast.

Details in track, strength, and timing remain uncertain, and overall

confidence remains low; however, it should be noted that most long

range guidance has been unusually consistent in hinting at a

potential wintry precipitation scenario late next week.

&&

 

Expand  

Yeah, pretty much. Every single one has shown snow for the region at some point.

The EURO may not be what we want...but it still consistently has at least a little snow for everyone.

The CMC started this whole mess (first to show 12"+)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/16/2022 at 8:51 PM, Chris78 said:

What's the 18z based off of if none of the 18z models have ran yet?

Expand  

Think of the NBM as a cycle or two behind the deterministic guidance. The 18z NBM has the 12z GFS/GEFS, but still has the 00z ECMWF/EPS and some 06z guidance. Full ECWMF 12z guidance is not within the NBM until its 21z run.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/16/2022 at 8:57 PM, Disc said:

Think of the NBM as a cycle or two behind the deterministic guidance. The 18z NBM has the 12z GFS/GEFS, but still has the 00z ECMWF/EPS and some 06z guidance. Full ECWMF 12z guidance is not within the NBM until its 21z run.

Expand  

That makes sense thanks. So it’s telling us we should have been celebrating 12 hours ago and we already know it’s going to be depressing at 0z lol. Nice model.  

  • Like 1
  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/16/2022 at 8:25 PM, Steve25 said:

I personally couldn't ever care less about what the Icon, Ukie, or frankly even the CMC show. But when they're all in agreement with the Euro, that's a very bad sign and trend. One is going to move towards the others at 0z tonight...

Expand  

Not being a Deb, but I think we are quickly losing the big MECS scenario in our regions. When was the last time numerous guidance moved almost in unison away from a MECS/HECS then subsequently moved back towards the single model holding out? It isn't common to see it play out like that. 

  • Like 1
  • Weenie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/16/2022 at 9:04 PM, Ralph Wiggum said:

Not being a Deb, but I think we are quickly losing the big MECS scenario in our regions. When was the last time numerous guidance moved almost in unison away from a MECS/HECS then subsequently moved back towards the single model holding out? It isn't common to see it play out like that. 

Expand  

Jan 2000 guidance had that hecs from range then lost it. But they never actually brought it back until it was snowing lol. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/16/2022 at 9:09 PM, psuhoffman said:

Jan 2000 guidance had that hecs from range then lost it. But they never actually brought it back until it was snowing lol. 

Expand  

That was an out-to-sea scenario, and then it turned north at the last minute. 

I remember Doug Hill saying "okay, I'm a little suspicious, this seems to be moving north not east..."

We're not going to do the reverse unless there's a redevelopment scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The model disparity in the handling of the TPV underscores the importance of having negative height anomalies underneath the NAO ridge in order for it to act as an effective block, encouraging a favorable storm track underneath. Fill that area in with a ridge and it becomes largely impotent and of little use to achieve the desired outcome.

1671775200-6D9qKNX9lRs.png

1671764400-Gqil2UTKEFw.png

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/16/2022 at 9:18 PM, Terpeast said:

That was an out-to-sea scenario, and then it turned north at the last minute. 

I remember Doug Hill saying "okay, I'm a little suspicious, this seems to be moving north not east..."

We're not going to do the reverse unless there's a redevelopment scenario.

Expand  

You've been awfully definitive in your announcements that this is all but dead and buried...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/16/2022 at 9:24 PM, SnowLover22 said:

Not that it matters that much but Icon just made a step toward the gfs camp. 

Expand  

Hey any positive is welcome at this point (I know I'm contradicting myself after I just trashed the ICON earlier, lol). Less energy left behind in WC. Look up top did seem to improve a bit

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...