Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

December 2022 Obs/Disc


40/70 Benchmark
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

It’s still a good block but the orientation matters. But this is only for the earlier period prior to 12/14 or so.

I just think a lot of folks are having higher confidence past a 12 day-2 week forecast period than **i believe** is warranted 

I know Ray bc he believes in medium range forecasting skill ..But Most others bc models have consistently shown a great look at day 10-15 for 5 days but the look hasn’t got inside 10 days .  I don’t have much faith in medium term forecasting on our sensible weather, never mind high confidence.  Yes this Period still has a high ceiling but wide goal posts 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, greenmtnwx said:

Agree. And remember the talk wasn’t just about it cooling down or we might be just near normal to climatology etc.. It was more talk of historic block, 2010 walking through the door, monster potential all that. 

This still has historic potential.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, greenmtnwx said:

Agree. And remember the talk wasn’t just about it cooling down or we might be just near normal to climatology etc.. It was more talk of historic block, 2010 walking through the door, monster potential all that. 

It still may happen.. but this uneasiness that most of us here are feeling is not for naught. We simply cannot waste the first 3 weeks of December and expect it will just flip to snow and chill 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Sey-Mour Snow said:

Things have only trended worse for next week as most of it looks warm and unsettled as guidance has pushed the beginning of the favorable period later and later.. Now the favorable period is more Dec 13+ instead of Dec 10+... We just hope that it doesn't keep on getting pushed back.. However we can still sneak in a storm in the Dec 9/10 timeframe if we thread the needle.

You should post more often!!

  • Like 1
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Sey-Mour Snow said:

Things have only trended worse for next week as most of it looks warm and unsettled as guidance has pushed the beginning of the favorable period later and later.. Now the favorable period is more Dec 13+ instead of Dec 10+... We just hope that it doesn't keep on getting pushed back.. However we can still sneak in a storm in the Dec 9/10 timeframe if we thread the needle.

Which initially was Dec 5th. You can scroll back and see all the posts. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Sey-Mour Snow said:

Things have only trended worse for next week as most of it looks warm and unsettled as guidance has pushed the beginning of the favorable period later and later.. Now the favorable period is more Dec 13+ instead of Dec 10+... We just hope that it doesn't keep on getting pushed back.. However we can still sneak in a storm in the Dec 9/10 timeframe if we thread the needle.

Some people don’t want to hear it, so you can’t make them, but this is absolutely true. We are slowly inching the really good look out in time. That is fact, not fiction 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

Which initially was Dec 5th. You can scroll back and see all the posts. 

Well yes Monday is December 5th and is next week.  It’s delayed about a week from the initial great pattern depiction about 2 weeks back.  But it quickly turned into a December 7-9 pattern change last weekend, however the past two days has now turned it into  December 13+.  I am a bit uneasy about the delay too, however if we can get this pattern into the 5-10 day range instead of the 10-15 day range I’d feel much better. 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, STILL N OF PIKE said:

I just think a lot of folks are having higher confidence past a 12 day-2 week forecast period than **i believe** is warranted 

I know Ray bc he believes in medium range forecasting skill ..But Most others bc models have consistently shown a great look at day 10-15 for 5 days but the look hasn’t got inside 10 days .  I don’t have much faith in medium term forecasting on our sensible weather, never mind high confidence.  Yes this Period still has a high ceiling but wide goal posts 

It's not just about model forecasting skill, though. This big block is not going away....do I trust long range guidance? No. But I do trust my ability assess the tropical landscape, and the tropics and to a lesser extent the stratosphere is not going to allow this to go to crap.

Not happening. Now, if someone is going to yell bust because we don't end up with January 2011 or March 2018, then that is on them.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, brooklynwx99 said:

as i said yesterday… this looks horrible. draw the shades for a while

ECA32BD1-DE55-4D2D-B608-8C436FEC0192.thumb.png.cd3c684ad96474868d7a9c4427227834.png

10 to 15 day ensembles have no skill, the 10 to 15 day ensemble mean looked good two weeks ago as does today’s….as I said many times statistically it is worse than a coin flip

image.gif

  • Like 1
  • Weenie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MJO812 said:

LoL at everyone getting worried 

Yeah there’s no reason to worry. As long as there is blocking it will snow. Not every threat will work out but we will have enough chances that the odds of us making it out of December without at least one big storm is very low.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, George001 said:

Yeah there’s no reason to worry. As long as there is blocking it will snow. Not every threat will work out but we will have enough chances that the odds of us making it out of December without at least one big storm is very low.

Also there won’t be cutters with a block . I think  you should remind folks of that 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mreaves said:

Yes ...but a lot happens in that amount of time. It comes down to greater expectations for excitement when the ball is in play. NFL Football is also just one example...  The NBA can't be ridiculed for the same product model.   Baseball certainly can - it's taking hits in recent generation(s), too.

Again, it was not about the sport in that missive?  The satire was directed toward the cultural attention span.

agreed though, all these products are over-sold.   They could actually make all the money they need on other exposure methods.  Jerseys and uniforms, side-line graphics, field paint.  Other techniques to get it across anyway.   It may be in the works... with the increased streaming tech infrastructure, the 'cable captive audience' model is slipping into history.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, George001 said:

That’s right. Lows don’t ram into massive blocks like this one.

George ... I am going to do you a favor as a reward for having not used the word 'blizzard' over the span of your last 20 posts ...

The storm loading pattern is from the Pacific.  Not the block. The Pacific matters in fact entirely.   Blocking is just an indication of where storms can't go, but it is in fact there because of the total circulation/wave mechanical forcing that is always vectored W--> E in the NH mid latitudes. Which means ... the Pacific ultimately caused the block. 

Just helping you understand the conceptualization of this stuff.   

There is no storm if the Pacific does not provide disturbances  ( and by Pacific in this context, that means "from west to east" ).

Also, the blocking episodes that do materialize can be too aggressive...and cause a larger scale destructive interference pattern, and so the Pacific can do it's part to deliver disturbances into eastern N/A ...but they get summarily damped out by compression and velocity surpluses ...which is a shearing factor.  Not just about suppressing - the block is really only a favorable aspect within a narrower window than people probably are aware.  

Lakes cutters are less likely in the presence of a west limb -NAO...yes, that is true...but if the -NAO is decaying as a system is organizing, it may move in that direct.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...