Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,607
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

December 2022 Obs/Disc


40/70 Benchmark
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Typhoon Tip said:

I’m actually more concerned about this whole thing weakening in the guidance.  The total manifold of the trough has been steadily losing mechanics in small percentages the last 6 consecutive runs. It could even end up being ironically weak and S 

Oh man...you always queef in the punch

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah just looking at that 500 mbar evolution with a multi contoured mid level quasi cut off low deepening further while moving slowly underneath Long Island

…there’s no way to estimate the frontogenic pounding that’s capable of in that evolution. 

just be aware of model magnification.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Oh man...you always queef in the punch

Kevin hit the nail on the head a couple years back lol.. when he said Tip seems to always go opposite of what the current consensus might be.  Could just be coincidental, or not? Who knows?  
 

When things don’t look so good, he’s showing/explaining why he feels it may improve. And when it starts looking better/good, he’s showing why it may shit the bed.  Funny how that goes. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WinterWolf said:

Kevin hit the nail on the head a couple years back lol.. when he said Tip seems to always go opposite of what the current consensus might be.  Could just be coincidental, or not? Who knows?  
 

When things don’t look so good, he’s showing/explaining why he feels it may improve. And when it starts looking better/good, he’s showing why it may shit the bed.  Funny how that goes. 

He's just playing devil's advocate 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, brooklynwx99 said:

this is a significant trend at 500mb. makes sense to have a shove S given the anomalous 50/50 and ridging in central Canada

this is certainly worth keeping an eye on

69181B91-CB2D-477E-AE1D-011862073DEF.thumb.gif.d1b8404bdf67cfe3626ecc1a0826e6c3.gif

I don’t think it’s done either, gfs has a progressive bias so it could be breaking down the -NAO too early. So the storm could easily slow down even more, increasing QPF. Big Euro run tonight.

  • Weenie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, WinterWolf said:

Kevin hit the nail on the head a couple years back lol.. when he said Tip seems to always go opposite of what the current consensus might be.  Could just be coincidental, or not? Who knows?  
 

When things don’t look so good, he’s showing/explaining why he feels it may improve. And when it starts looking better/good, he’s showing why it may shit the bed.  Funny how that goes. 

It’s one run it’s hardly a consensus. 

Look I’ve been talking about model magnification and having a shed momentum in the mid range for about three years it’s a reality that’s not going away just because it needs to placate this addiction to model cinema shit. 

Sorry for bringing up realistic reasons to temper enthusiasm and not let it get away from you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Typhoon Tip said:

It’s one run it’s hardly a consensus. 

Look I’ve been talking about model magnification and having a shed momentum in the mid range for about three years it’s not going away just because it is placates this addiction to model cinema shit. 

Sorry for bringing up realistic reasons to temper enthusiasm and not let it get away from youSorry for bringing up realistic reasons to temper enthusiasm and not let it get away from you

I was just breaking your ballz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Typhoon Tip said:

It’s one run it’s hardly a consensus. 

Look I’ve been talking about model magnification and having a shed momentum in the mid range for about three years it’s not going away just because it is placates this addiction to model cinema shit. 

Sorry for bringing up realistic reasons to temper enthusiasm and not let it get away from youSorry for bringing up realistic reasons to temper enthusiasm and not let it get away from you

You bring up a valid point. I’ve noticed that storms get weaker a lot as we go into the mid range. Sometimes the models re strengthen in the short range and sometimes they dont, we will have to see what happens with it. Hopefully it only weakens a little rather than becoming a shredded mess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

It’s one run it’s hardly a consensus. 

Look I’ve been talking about model magnification and having a shed momentum in the mid range for about three years it’s not going away just because it is placates this addiction to model cinema shit. 

Sorry for bringing up realistic reasons to temper enthusiasm and not let it get away from youSorry for bringing up realistic reasons to temper enthusiasm and not let it get away from you

Hey no worries..show us why it’s doubtful. I’m cool with that from a man or your wisdom.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can clearly tell that the GFS is too warm in the boundary layer again at that range, because there’s no way given that 700 500 mbar integrated evolution that that kind of sfc evolution is going to happen unless there’s a lack of cold air north of the circulation - which that’s unlikely given the antecedent conditions with the block and so forth.  

So yeah we’re talking about a solution that’s above the 85th percentile at 180 hours ? Mm. wouldnt shock me if this goes back the other way for a run or two before it comes back again but I suspect in the end the result is S. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, WinterWolf said:

Hey no worries..show us why it’s doubtful. I’m cool with that from a man or your wisdom.  

I’m not saying it’s doubtful… I’m telling you factually the models have been trending weaker when moving mid range events into the shorter term for a decade. I mean it’s something that has been going on. We’d be remiss not to consider that trend. 

by the way that’s a 1978 polar high W-N wow 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

I’m not saying it’s doubtful… I’m telling you factually the models have been trending weaker when moving mid range events in the shorter term for a decade. I mean it’s something that has been going on. We’d be remiss not to consider that trend. 

by the way that’s a 1978 polar high W-N wow 

No I get what you’re saying..and I agree. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...