Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Let’s talk weather!


Steve
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Gino27 said:

GFS takes a big jump to the NE. The east trend we are probably rooting for might actually be the worst case scenario if we don't get a favorable axis on the trowel with the low too far north. Then we're limited on our backside potential.

Climo finds a way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gino27 said:

GFS takes a big jump to the NE. The east trend we are probably rooting for might actually be the worst case scenario if we don't get a favorable axis on the trowel with the low too far north. Then we're limited on our backside potential.

If you asked me what the best place to be right now, (outside of lake influenced areas or far nw), I'm not sure I could pinpoint it.    That's what's crazy about this scenario.  If you're directly north or northeast of it you get rain wrapping in as it starts to bomb, if you're directly west of it, you run the risk of the dryslot.    I guess it's always best to be in closer proximity of the low itself but that's about all you can say.   Either way we should see squalls, wind, and even a short period of lake effect with the trajectory of the low....not including whatever synoptic happens.     Lots of localized winners and losers with this one.   Interesting for sure!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Latest SWC ideas on the end of week storm. It will be a rapidly, deepening storm. The bitter Arctic air slamming into a moist, subtropical jet will set the stage for low pressure to ”bomb” out over the Ohio Valley. 

The system is crossing into southwestern Canada this evening. As better sampling becomes available, more specifics can be ascertained. If we look at the 12z model suite from Monday afternoon, the storm projected East. In this case, a slightly colder look, earlier than other runs. Will the trend continue?  That is unknown; however, the energy in the Pacific appears a bit weaker. This leads to a little less amplification, or a flatter movement of the storm system.  What this means is a little more south and East projection of the surface low. The problem is 50 miles will mean a great deal. Specifics simply cannot be made, currently.  What can I tell you?

Pretty sure the storm will start out as a period of rain. The latest guidance seems to rush colder air in here faster Thursday evening into Friday morning.  This would imply a changeover to snow, sooner. So earlier changeover means more snow.  

Wind will likely end up being the most noticed issue from this storm. As the surface low rapidly deepens, winds will howl. Sustained winds over 40 mph with gusts to near 60 mph seems likely at the height of the storm.  With the snow, regardless of minor or major, blowing and drifting snow will become an issue. It is with some certainty that areas in the region will experience blizzard conditions. 

Flash freeze conditions come next. Temps in the 30s and 40s will nosedive into the single digits and teens. With the wind, wind chill temps will be below zero.  So be prepared for an abrupt change in air temperature. 

The hardest issue is track. What I am going to do is hazard a guess with track of this system. I truly feel that the cold is still a bit underestimated by models and the blocking over northeast Canada up into Greenland is being underplayed. This is why the 12z model trended east, and believe a bit more east movement is possible. The farther east this tracks, the more areas that could see more snowfall. I will try to zone in tomorrow and Wednesday on specifics, but as I sit here Monday evening, I still do not have that much confidence on what this storm will do. It is the fact that this storm could deepen so rapidly that models are still missing a key piece or two that can greatly alter the outcome of this storm. 

All I can say is stay tuned for future updates. 

What I will do is give you my track idea at this point in time. No real specific, again, but once you are east of the low, cold will scream in rapidly and expect snow soon afterwards. This map will change, but right now this is my idea.image.thumb.png.84153f059e8eb3134e0cefde0655fc97.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Steve said:

Latest SWC ideas on the end of week storm. It will be a rapidly, deepening storm. The bitter Arctic air slamming into a moist, subtropical jet will set the stage for low pressure to ”bomb” out over the Ohio Valley. 

The system is crossing into southwestern Canada this evening. As better sampling becomes available, more specifics can be ascertained. If we look at the 12z model suite from Monday afternoon, the storm projected East. In this case, a slightly colder look, earlier than other runs. Will the trend continue?  That is unknown; however, the energy in the Pacific appears a bit weaker. This leads to a little less amplification, or a flatter movement of the storm system.  What this means is a little more south and East projection of the surface low. The problem is 50 miles will mean a great deal. Specifics simply cannot be made, currently.  What can I tell you?

Pretty sure the storm will start out as a period of rain. The latest guidance seems to rush colder air in here faster Thursday evening into Friday morning.  This would imply a changeover to snow, sooner. So earlier changeover means more snow.  

Wind will likely end up being the most noticed issue from this storm. As the surface low rapidly deepens, winds will howl. Sustained winds over 40 mph with gusts to near 60 mph seems likely at the height of the storm.  With the snow, regardless of minor or major, blowing and drifting snow will become an issue. It is with some certainty that areas in the region will experience blizzard conditions. 

Flash freeze conditions come next. Temps in the 30s and 40s will nosedive into the single digits and teens. With the wind, wind chill temps will be below zero.  So be prepared for an abrupt change in air temperature. 

The hardest issue is track. What I am going to do is hazard a guess with track of this system. I truly feel that the cold is still a bit underestimated by models and the blocking over northeast Canada up into Greenland is being underplayed. This is why the 12z model trended east, and believe a bit more east movement is possible. The farther east this tracks, the more areas that could see more snowfall. I will try to zone in tomorrow and Wednesday on specifics, but as I sit here Monday evening, I still do not have that much confidence on what this storm will do. It is the fact that this storm could deepen so rapidly that models are still missing a key piece or two that can greatly alter the outcome of this storm. 

All I can say is stay tuned for future updates. 

What I will do is give you my track idea at this point in time. No real specific, again, but once you are east of the low, cold will scream in rapidly and expect snow soon afterwards. This map will change, but right now this is my idea.image.thumb.png.84153f059e8eb3134e0cefde0655fc97.png

Not saying this will happen… but there is still hope..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Floydbuster said:

Nice write-up, Steve. Everyone here is worried about ramifications on Christmas Eve and Christmas Day. 

Should of posted this…. Not my write up… wish I was that good.. Got it from SWC forecast center… out of Ohio..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, buckeye said:

so one of the trends I've seen in the last couple of model runs is for the trough to be less sharp, more broad.    This is good and bad for us.   Good because the cold comes in faster but weaker system.   Hope it's just a glitch otherwise this is a strong arctic frontal passage for all of us.

nam.gif

Just so we don't lose power!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, buckeye said:

so one of the trends I've seen in the last couple of model runs is for the trough to be less sharp, more broad.    This is good and bad for us.   Good because the cold comes in faster but weaker system.   Hope it's just a glitch otherwise this is a strong arctic frontal passage for all of us.

nam.gif

It’s looking like frontal passage which is no surprise. Lived here long enough to know that central Ohio does best with a clipper pattern which have been elusive the last several years. Big storms just don’t really occur in these parts. If they do, it’s usually some sort of taint that’s involved or a full fledged sleet storm like last February.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, pondo1000 said:

It’s looking like frontal passage which is no surprise. Lived here long enough to know that central Ohio does best with a clipper pattern which have been elusive the last several years. Big storms just don’t really occur in these parts. If they do, it’s usually some sort of taint that’s involved or a full fledged sleet storm like last February.

I was actually pulling for one of the west/stronger solutions to pan out. It would have been cool to see how such a dynamic storm would have played out, even around here. Now, it’s nothing special for anyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, pondo1000 said:

I was actually pulling for one of the west/stronger solutions to pan out. It would have been cool to see how such a dynamic storm would have played out, even around here. Now, it’s nothing special for anyone.

The gfs actually came in a bit stronger .   Honestly though, I wouldn't even be looking at snowfall maps until later tomorrow.   There are so many nuances with exact track, synoptic changeover time, localized squalls, etc.   Still, if we were staring down the barrel of our usual central OH xmas, (brown and 40 degrees), we'd be begging for something like this.       

Wasn't last year when we had the xmas eve 4 incher?  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, buckeye said:

The gfs actually came in a bit stronger .   Honestly though, I wouldn't even be looking at snowfall maps until later tomorrow.   There are so many nuances with exact track, synoptic changeover time, localized squalls, etc.   Still, if we were staring down the barrel of our usual central OH xmas, (brown and 40 degrees), we'd be begging for something like this.       

Wasn't last year when we had the xmas eve 4 incher?  

That was 2020 & it was so nice. Snowed all night xmas eve & snow showers all day xmas day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, buckeye said:

The gfs actually came in a bit stronger .   Honestly though, I wouldn't even be looking at snowfall maps until later tomorrow.   There are so many nuances with exact track, synoptic changeover time, localized squalls, etc.   Still, if we were staring down the barrel of our usual central OH xmas, (brown and 40 degrees), we'd be begging for something like this.       

Wasn't last year when we had the xmas eve 4 incher?  

If there wasn’t the chance for power outages, I’d be with you.  But if we get a cold, dry, wind machine which forces me to look for a hotel on Christmas Eve, I’ll be pissed.  :P I’d rather have 40’s and brown then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JayPSU said:

If there wasn’t the chance for power outages, I’d be with you.  But if we get a cold, dry, wind machine which forces me to look for a hotel on Christmas Eve, I’ll be pissed.  :P I’d rather have 40’s and brown then.

I can definitely agree with that.   The wind factor is a big question mark.  A handle on that won't be known until the system is getting underway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...