Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,611
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Hurricane Ian


Scott747
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, mappy said:

I too will be impacted by its remnants this weekend, but you don't see me asking for information about that here. I go to my subforum. You should do that. 

Forgive me for querying "Wonder what Ian will be up to this weekend", logically finding "Tropical Headquarters --> Hurricane Ian" and hoping it might be the place

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, StantonParkHoya said:

Forgive me for querying "Wonder what Ian will be up to this weekend", logically finding "Tropical Headquarters --> Hurricane Ian" and hoping it might be the place

And its still being discussed. Just scroll by the posts that dont interest you and youll be okay. Promise :) 

  • Haha 3
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, StantonParkHoya said:

Forgive me for querying "Wonder what Ian will be up to this weekend", logically finding "Tropical Headquarters --> Hurricane Ian" and hoping it might be the place

873 posts and a 5 year old account make me doubt that this was the process you used to find this thread.

No one... I mean absolutely no one... should be using social media to make decisions. We have an entire agency devoted to providing that information. This place is for the average person to discuss the weather, it's impacts, and related topics. It so happens that a few mets have nothing better to do with their time and like to join in, too. It gets off topic at times. Cope. No one is forcing you to be here.

 

Imagine complaining about "dirtying" up a thread while.... being guilty of the same. :blink:

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Great Snow 1717 said:

Sandy wasn't a Cat 3 or higher hurricane. ....the damage would be far more extensive.

It had the pressure of a Cat 3, huge overall size and the funneling effect of NY Harbor and back bays to channel in the surge. The winds weren’t Cat 3 level but the same energy was just spread over a larger area. The surge was devastating for millions of people. Actual Hurricane Gloria made landfall in my town and was nowhere near as bad, as well as actual borderline TS/Hurricane Irene. 

Again there’s no magic delineator between “non-tropical” and “tropical” that defines how dangerous a storm is. It’s why so many changes were made to the NHC products after Sandy. My hometown on a barrier island had scores of people that stayed because they heard “Sandy won’t even be a hurricane” when it gets here. 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NJwx85 said:

Sandy was about as extreme as you will ever get up this way. Numerous gusts over 90mph for many hours. A true tropical major couldn’t survive up this way.

Locally we had hours of 50-60 mph gust before the 80-90 mph gusts came in-the former certainly weakened many limbs and trees, the bigger gusts finished them off.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NJwx85 said:

Sandy was about as extreme as you will ever get up this way. Numerous gusts over 90mph for many hours. A true tropical major couldn’t survive up this way.

I'm not saying Sandy wasn't a very impactful storm BUT I still believe a CAT 3 or higher in SNE would cause even worse devastation. The original post was about some individuals in the SNE  subforum who want/wish for a Cat 3 or higher to hit SNE. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, StantonParkHoya said:

Believe me, no one is using this thread full of nut-jobs to make decisions. It's really more for ease of aggregation of information (ie. models, met commentary, etc.) in one place. I really don't care what Bob Smith in Philly thinks is going to occur.

 

Ah, forgive me, Lord Stanton.

While I fear it may be too late for me, I pray that you take mercy on my family for disrupting your personal aggregation of information.

 

GMAFB and get over yourself.  Make a folder of links in your browser like the rest of us. Or, better yet, get off AmWx, learn some html, and put your own site together. It isn't difficult. Also, I'd caution against using social media met hurricane commentary from a broadcast met in Bumfuck, Alaska for anything other than entertainment (No offense meant to any mets, here. Just, being a met != being a tropical expert )

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, NavarreDon said:

Amazing wind across the Deep South with Ian & pressure gradients.

f0c21861d9b02d51d7968dfe75e94109.jpg


.

How much does the pressure difference add to the power of the storm? So I gather that's what a "baroclinic zone" is?

Hard for me to quantify just how large that effect would be in this situation for example. Does the NHC factor that into the wind rating for Ian, or is it just sort of an additional influence that adds some additional power to the perceived surface winds?

 

Thanks to anyone, trying to wrap my head around this though I understand how a pressure gradient generates wind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Volcanic Winter said:

How much does the pressure difference add to the power of the storm? So I gather that's what a "baroclinic zone" is?

Hard for me to quantify just how large that effect would be in this situation for example. Does the NHC factor that into the wind rating for Ian, or is it just sort of an additional influence that adds some additional power to the perceived surface winds?

 

Thanks to anyone, trying to wrap my head around this though I understand how a pressure gradient generates wind.

Tropical lows, hybrid lows and polar lows all will produce higher wind if there is tighter pressure gradient.  Alicia almost 30 years ago had 1014 mb pressure when named, it was in an area of abnormally high pressure.  The gradient between a strong cold ridge in the NE and a developing NE-ster is why the winds are so high to the N and W of the cyclone.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, MattPetrulli said:

Agreed with the sentiment expressed earlier by @GaWx, feel like a more east landfall is the way. Also those rain bands just offshore north of the center seem really nasty and probably have a broad field of 50 knot+ winds.

There have been a few runs/progs that showed a southern NC landfall. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, WxWatcher007 said:

 

8L2SUoo.png

The UKMET track swinging it south and probably back around to Florida is interesting, in a slapstick "Coyote getting repeatedly hit by boulders while chasing Roadrunner" kind of way. 

 

A cursory glance through historical track records seems to indicate that has never occurred, so it seems unlikely. Hopefully it follows the set of tracks that show it landfalling and then shooting into the Atlantic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...