mahk_webstah Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 You get good deformation snows... I fookin hope so. See that v in the qpf field from Brian and I down to Will? EAger to see totals Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowMan Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 24" per the NAM. Station ID: KTAN Lat: 41.87 Long: -71.02 NAM Model Run: 0Z 25DEC 2010 HR Valid 2m Tmp 2m Dpt 10m Dir 10m Spd TPrcp CPrcp 1000-500 500mb 850mb 500mb MSLP TCC PRS WX Tot Snowfall Vis Deg F Deg F deg kt in. in. Thk GPH Tmp Tmp mb % TEXT Clouds in SM 0 12/25 00Z 27 22 322 9 0.00 0.00 533 544 -3.0 -25.9 1014 0 CLR 0.0 14.9 3 12/25 03Z 25 19 331 10 0.00 0.00 532 544 -3.8 -24.9 1014 6 265FEW280 0.0 15.1 6 12/25 06Z 23 19 329 8 0.00 0.00 532 543 -4.1 -24.0 1014 14 221FEW244 0.0 14.9 9 12/25 09Z 22 18 334 8 0.00 0.00 531 544 -4.2 -24.2 1016 0 CLR 0.0 15.1 12 12/25 12Z 20 17 342 6 0.00 0.00 531 543 -4.0 -24.0 1014 33 236SCT289 0.0 15.1 15 12/25 15Z 26 21 344 4 0.00 0.00 531 543 -4.2 -23.1 1015 98 182BKN297 0.0 15.1 18 12/25 18Z 31 23 5 3 0.00 0.00 531 543 -4.1 -23.0 1014 98 133OVC239 0.0 15.1 21 12/25 21Z 31 27 332 1 0.00 0.00 530 542 -4.3 -24.3 1014 100 043OVC199 0.0 14.9 24 12/26 00Z 30 26 42 2 0.00 0.00 530 541 -4.0 -25.6 1014 100 123OVC304 0.0 14.9 27 12/26 03Z 29 25 31 1 0.00 0.00 529 541 -5.2 -25.3 1015 100 099OVC280 0.0 14.9 30 12/26 06Z 29 27 19 2 0.00 0.00 529 540 -5.8 -24.4 1014 100 069OVC266 0.0 15.1 33 12/26 09Z 29 28 10 4 0.00 0.00 530 540 -6.2 -24.0 1013 100 049OVC253 0.0 15.0 36 12/26 12Z 29 29 4 5 0.00 0.00 530 541 -6.9 -24.2 1013 100 000OVC279 0.0 5.9 39 12/26 15Z 33 32 46 5 0.04 0.00 531 541 -7.2 -23.9 1013 100 -SN 000OVC265 0.4 1.7 42 12/26 18Z 35 33 45 11 0.04 0.00 533 541 -6.8 -22.5 1009 100 -SN 000OVC267 0.4 11.1 45 12/26 21Z 32 31 43 16 0.12 0.00 535 541 -6.4 -20.2 1006 100 -SN 000OVC281 1.2 0.6 48 12/27 00Z 31 30 28 20 0.20 0.00 538 539 -6.2 -16.2 1001 100 SN 000OVC256 2.0 0.3 51 12/27 03Z 31 31 30 24 0.48 0.00 538 534 -7.1 -19.7 995 100 SN 000OVC199 4.8 0.4 54 12/27 06Z 32 31 24 31 0.37 0.00 539 527 -5.1 -20.5 984 100 SN 001OVC250 3.9 0.3 57 12/27 09Z 31 30 2 29 0.37 0.00 539 520 -5.7 -20.6 975 100 SN OVC262 3.8 0.2 60 12/27 12Z 29 27 343 30 0.61 0.00 536 516 -7.1 -20.4 975 100 SN OVC273 6.1 0.3 63 12/27 15Z 27 25 319 25 0.18 0.00 533 516 -8.3 -19.7 979 100 -SN OVC232 1.8 0.9 66 12/27 18Z 26 22 311 23 0.03 0.00 531 517 -8.5 -20.9 982 100 001OVC271 0.0 6.2 69 12/27 21Z 25 19 312 22 0.00 0.00 530 518 -7.1 -22.3 985 100 029OVC270 0.0 14.9 72 12/28 00Z 22 15 310 21 0.00 0.00 528 520 -6.6 -24.8 990 100 041OVC070 0.0 15.1 75 12/28 03Z 19 11 310 20 0.00 0.00 525 520 -5.6 -25.2 993 51 215BKN218 0.0 15.1 78 12/28 06Z 15 7 308 19 0.00 0.00 522 518 -6.8 -26.9 995 27 179SCT199 0.0 15.1 81 12/28 09Z 14 6 309 18 0.00 0.00 519 517 -7.1 -29.2 996 0 CLR 0.0 15.1 84 12/28 12Z 13 5 311 17 0.00 0.00 518 518 -7.3 -29.4 999 0 CLR 0.0 15.1 where can i pull this for my area? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 So, if the Euro doesn't come west...do we take that as an outlier model? I mean to see virtually come west it would be hard to go against that but it's not too often you say throw out the euo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 You get good deformation snows... And I don't think I'd guarantee the QPF plays out exactly like this either. There are two maxes...the 2nd where the redevelopment is. Someone will get a relatively "dead zone", but we'll have to see where that pans out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PineHillsWx Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 Harvey Leonard seems to be on board based on his comments opening the news. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 And I don't think I'd guarantee the QPF plays out exactly like this either. There are two maxes...the 2nd where the redevelopment is. Someone will get a relatively "dead zone", but we'll have to see where that pans out. Odds are that's the Connecticut River Valley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattmfm Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF 24/21Z SREF AND 25/00Z NAM SHOWS BOTH MODELSHAVE TRENDED SLOWER AND FARTHER EAST WITH THEIR TRACKS OF A SURFACELOW PRESSURE SUNDAY NIGHT INTO MONDAY. Did I miss something? 21z SREFs trended west, didn't they? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Windcredible! Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 WOW Ryan!!! AWESOME!!! Did he have much to say at the opening of the newscast? I'm tuned in for the full report! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hooralph Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 This is how the great ones are: a late and strong trend toasted the extreme solution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 Harvey Leonard seems to be on board based on his comments opening the news. It's hard not to be right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF 24/21Z SREF AND 25/00Z NAM SHOWS BOTH MODELSHAVE TRENDED SLOWER AND FARTHER EAST WITH THEIR TRACKS OF A SURFACELOW PRESSURE SUNDAY NIGHT INTO MONDAY. Did I miss something? 21z SREFs trended west, didn't they? Likely a mistype. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinch Leatherwood Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 Not quite sure what causes the pie slice of lower QPF on the GFS. That's the shadow of Mt Tolland. I just took an ambien to knock myself out before the EC (hopefully or I'll eat seven boxes of cookies between now and then and not remember it in the morning). Want to see what the GGEM comes up with. Would LOVE to see a fuller explanation from NCEP. Seems to me they aren't saying it was data assimilation, more like model errors for whatever reason on the three. Strange that this problem is found at 12z and on the next run of the, Nogaps, UK, RGEM there is a huge trend NW. Problem found and fixed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF 24/21Z SREF AND 25/00Z NAM SHOWS BOTH MODELSHAVE TRENDED SLOWER AND FARTHER EAST WITH THEIR TRACKS OF A SURFACELOW PRESSURE SUNDAY NIGHT INTO MONDAY. Did I miss something? 21z SREFs trended west, didn't they? Yeah I think they meant west. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TalcottWx Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 The hstoric ones never mix bos... sitting pretty.. waiting for euro tho... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 But in all seriousness...p-type issues for Mass coast? Where? Cape Cod, wet snow, CC Canal and W snow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 Did he have much to say at the opening of the newscast? I'm tuned in for the full report! He basically said that latest computer models have trended west with the storm and that he thinks it's coming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattlacroix4 Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF 24/21Z SREF AND 25/00Z NAM SHOWS BOTH MODELSHAVE TRENDED SLOWER AND FARTHER EAST WITH THEIR TRACKS OF A SURFACELOW PRESSURE SUNDAY NIGHT INTO MONDAY. Did I miss something? 21z SREFs trended west, didn't they? I think it was a typo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIPPYVALLEY Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 Odds are that's the Connecticut River Valley. Thanks Ryan, I was wondering who would say it first - lol. At least N Valley is much tighter with elevation - not as worried here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DomNH Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 Anyway, have a fantastic night and a fantastic Christmas everybody. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinch Leatherwood Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 It's hard not to be right now. Harv was on board 6 hours ago. He pretty clearly discounted the discount of the GFS. He's old school and perfectly capabable of recognizing a pattern or tendency, he's the best of the best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowMan Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 Where? Cape Cod, wet snow, CC Canal and W snow I was more referring North of Boston Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 This is crazy, wow. Gulf lows FTW?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 Man will this euro run be much anticipated?? LOL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkO Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 The Euro relies on the assumption that the data the American's give them is accurate. If there are flaws in that data, they don't own responsibility. So no, not a win because of an unfair playing field. The Euro was a sig hit at every run until the Americans might have fed that model garbage - my guess is the Euro will abruptly adjust toward this. Are you saying what I think you're saying??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmagan Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 So, if the Euro doesn't come west...do we take that as an outlier model? I mean to see virtually come west it would be hard to go against that but it's not too often you say throw out the euo The UKMET coming west nearly seals the deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 BOS wouldn't have ptype issues...it would be quite difficult for BOS to get ptype issues even on an amped up GFS solution because the ageostrophic wind component is very strong with the bombing low as far south as it is and a high to the NW. You'd probably have to go to the Cape to see any. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 Harv was on board 6 hours ago. He pretty clearly discounted the discount of the GFS. He's old school and perfectly capabable of recognizing a pattern or tendency, he's the best of the best. So HPC thing earlier was apparently incorrect? I missed about 8 hours of posts... And what Tip was saying a few minutes ago - Euro was getting bad data making it go too far east, might line up with GFS, NAM, Japanese model, Ukie, and just about everything else. Rev Kev should be perma banned until April Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 I was more referring North of Boston If cc doesn't mix, it's a safe bet Danvers won't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CCPSUSuperstorm2010 Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 According to both GFS and NAM 700mb moisture fields at 36 hours, we could be waking up on Sunday morning looking at visible satellite imagery and just say, "haven't we seen this before?" Just amazing. I would caution to see the 12z suite before going gung ho on this just yet, need more consistency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.