Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,874
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Andywenie
    Newest Member
    Andywenie
    Joined

December 26-27 Storm Threat


Baroclinic Zone

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  On 12/25/2010 at 4:50 AM, Happy Valley said:

Can actually get much better for you, me and some others on this board. I would have no problem with this storm tracking over Hyannis and then heading NE.

:)

It can get better here for sure, But it will be at someone elses expense for us to jackpot somebody will be raining...........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/25/2010 at 4:53 AM, dendrite said:

Must be some good hits up here on the ensembles.

Yea I agree... I am actually starting to like our location for this. We won't have to worry about dryslot and we could try and get into that deform band, which usually sets up pretty far away from the center

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/25/2010 at 4:57 AM, snowNH said:

Yea I agree... I am actually starting to like our location for this. We won't have to worry about dryslot and we could try and get into that deform band, which usually sets up pretty far away from the center

If it goes near the ensembles prediction, there probably would be a band pretty far nw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/25/2010 at 4:41 AM, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Is it me, or is NCEP desperately grasping at straws.

Well they are pointing out legitimate errors and they seem to be figuring out what I've noticed long ago - that the models seem to be able to ingest some foul stuff and not be greatly effected. We will likely see fluctuations as we get further away from the mess but their ideas aren't bad.

Figure on a track to about the BM knowing it could go 40 miles in any direction and that's that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never really seen HPC coming out with these nearly on the hour updates tamping down each and every model runs. First 12z and 18z were inaccurate for initialization issues, now they're concerned about 00z for feedback. Just strange considering consistent shifts on even the global models thus far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/25/2010 at 4:58 AM, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I think the EURO moves to the nw edge of the envelope.

I don't think its going GFS style personally. It will probably come in like the NAM or something. The GFS being on the western fringe of guidance is really weird, and maybe this is part of its new found "upgrade" we saw in the summer, but it hadn't really shown it yet in a winter storm.

We'll see about this one. It would be a weird sick joke if the GFS busted by being too amplified. I would think some of the M.A. folks would want to literally nuke it because it had played so many cruel tricks during its suppressed days.

But we'll find out who's right and who's wrong pretty soon. Should be a very interesting next 2 days at any rate, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/25/2010 at 5:00 AM, mattmfm said:

Never really seen HPC coming out with these nearly on the hour updates tamping down each and every model runs. First 12z and 18z were inaccurate for initialization issues, now they're concerned about 00z for feedback. Just strange considering consistent shifts on even the global models thus far.

They seem very reluctant to capitulate to what would have to be considered a pretty epic model castatrophe by contemporary standards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/25/2010 at 5:00 AM, 40/70 Benchmark said:

NAM has a gradient equal to the blizz of '78, which I think is overdone, but.....GFS is more realistic at 10mb below that.

per 0z GFS 1029mb high over Arkansas...975ish low south of Chatham...thats good for 60-70 mph gusts somewhere if it verified.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/25/2010 at 5:06 AM, BostonWX said:

THIS^

ANd it manifests in very bullish solutions when the storm is clearly trending suppressed and vice versa

Yea, they make damn sure they do not EVER bite on a faux trend, but the catch 22 is that they often are a day late and a $ short with regard to viable trends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/25/2010 at 5:00 AM, messenger said:

Well they are pointing out legitimate errors and they seem to be figuring out what I've noticed long ago - that the models seem to be able to ingest some foul stuff and not be greatly effected. We will likely see fluctuations as we get further away from the mess but their ideas aren't bad.

Figure on a track to about the BM knowing it could go 40 miles in any direction and that's that.

That I'm sure is something that we could all be happy with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...