Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,617
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    RyRyB
    Newest Member
    RyRyB
    Joined

2022 Mid-Atlantic Severe Wx Thread (General Discussion Etc)


Kmlwx
 Share

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, Kmlwx said:

Honestly it looks even sub-meh at this point. I'm not even tracking this one anymore. It's still early in the season anyhow. We need to wait for warmer temps, higher dews. 

I look forward to a time when our window for severe wx is more consistently expanded. Upsides friends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe sneaky severe storm on Wednesday too?

Morning AFD from LWX 

A warm front will return back north on Wednesday. Therefore, WAA
will increase once again. If the warm front moves north of the
region as indicated by most guidance, sun could aid in bringing
temperatures towards the 80 degree mark east of I-81, with a few
locations a degree or two higher. Rain chances on Wednesday are
highest along the Mason-Dixon line closer to where a shortwave
trough will pass through. Cannot rule out a thunderstorm across
the far northwest given the forecast instability, though
uncertainty remains if the instability will be surface based or
elevated. Should greater instability be realized, some rotating
updrafts aren`t out of the question given what appears to be
supportive deep layer shear, but even then, am not sure that
there would be enough CAPE for severe storms. Conditions should
stabilize as diurnal heating is lost Wednesday evening into the
overnight, with many locations drying out.

Thursday will feature a potent cold front passing through the
area into the afternoon and evening hours. High temperatures
Thursday will be highly sensitive to the timing of the cold
front passage. Current guidance suggests a later cold front
passage, resulting in warm southerly flow ahead of the cold
front bringing temperatures to near 80 degrees again east of the
mountains. The dynamics associated with the cold front will
yield the next opportunity for rain showers and thunderstorms.
This is another HSLC set up, with 50-60 kt bulk shear and mean
CAPE less than 300 J/kg. A few ensemble members continue to
bring CAPE values significantly higher near the metros late
Thursday, but confidence is low at this time if the instability
would be rooted within the boundary layer. Will maintain the
potential for thunderstorms Thursday afternoon/evening, some of
which could be strong or even severe.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wednesday has some sneaky supercell potential for the northwest areas, perhaps HGR and points west and north of there.  CAMs suggest that the greatest threat for a few cells is in PA, but there is a signal for northwest and western MD     The wind profiles might not support TORs, but they would support storm rotation.

NAM Nest and hi-res FV3 both show a narrow line ahead of the front Thursday afternoon.   There are questions about the amount of instability, and some of the wind profiles look “weird”, but this could eventually end up as a SLGT day. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really not sure what to make of the SVR chances this afternoon.    Pretty much every CAM brings some sort of line or broken line through the area (with perhaps a few stronger cells immediately behind), but there is no agreement on intensity.    Overall, based on simulated reflectivity, it's tough to expect more than a few SVR reports, but if we can maximize surface heating without mixing out the low-level moisture, perhaps we can have a modestly more interesting event.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, high risk said:

Really not sure what to make of the SVR chances this afternoon.    Pretty much every CAM brings some sort of line or broken line through the area (with perhaps a few stronger cells immediately behind), but there is no agreement on intensity.    Overall, based on simulated reflectivity, it's tough to expect more than a few SVR reports, but if we can maximize surface heating without mixing out the low-level moisture, perhaps we can have a modestly more interesting event.

12z RAOB has decent mid level lapse rates. Could definitely be a conditional wind threat. Wouldn't shock me to see the 15% wind get nudges back further SW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Eskimo Joe said:

12z RAOB has decent mid level lapse rates. Could definitely be a conditional wind threat. Wouldn't shock me to see the 15% wind get nudges back further SW.

       Agreed.    Ultimately, I think it's going to come down to the surface dew points.    The NAM Nest and ARW2 keep dew points around 60 ahead of the line, and both have impressive reflectivity signatures.    Other CAMs (including the HRRR) mix out the low-level moisture and end up with mid 50s dew points, and their simulated radars look very meh.

   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...