Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Feb 1-3rd GHD III Part 2


Chicago Storm
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, sbnwx85 said:

Also showing impressive banding just to my west with 20 inch totals in northern Porter and LaPorte. 20 inches may not be realistic...but a good indication someone will get buried under good banding.

Edit: Might be some lake enhancement there, too?

Peoria to LaPorte = IKK jackpot if you ask me :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Hoosier said:

Do you have any thoughts on the lake enhancement potential in the area?  I don't want to say the parameters are God awful the whole time, but... lol

Inversion height get pretty shallow at times, like 4k feet with considerable drying just above.  Sufficient delta T up to that level though.  Seems like the most aggressive guidance may be overdone.  Thoughts?

late run 18z HRRR joins the rest of the models in this big time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sheesh. It's almost hard amongst all the discussion to really grasp what 12-20" will do to this region. Everything is just so open and flat across NE IN/NW Ohio. To combine that with what will be a more powdery snow on Thursday & gusty winds into Friday, this part of the country is going to be absolutely shut down for days. I think drifts approaching 10' in some spots is not out of the question

Tab2FileL.png?239328a6524f70d3fade151a1324906c

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you have any thoughts on the lake enhancement potential in the area?  I don't want to say the parameters are God awful the whole time, but... lol
Inversion height get pretty shallow at times, like 4k feet with considerable drying just above.  Sufficient delta T up to that level though.  Seems like the most aggressive guidance may be overdone.  Thoughts?
I'd call initial inversion heights sub marginal. Since you will certainly be saturated and have good synoptic forcing with right jet entrance region, the enhancement will probably be of speed convergence variety for the most part. As delta T and instability improves and inversion heights come up to or above 850 mb, then it's more marginal to conditional with continued speed convergence onto land. Because there's synoptic forcing in addition to boost in low level lift from the lake, I'd expect a modest boost in totals due to lake enhancement, maybe 1-3, 2-4" type stuff?

Last Feb actually didn't have great inversion heights, but synoptic lift and lake induced instability and convergence resulted in lift being centered in deep DGZ. This doesn't have nearly as favorable a setup but it's not nothing for a time. Jan 31, 2021 actually had pretty good lake enhancement despite marginal inversion heights, for example.

Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, nwohweather said:

Sheesh. It's almost hard amongst all the discussion to really grasp what 12-20" will do to this region. Everything is just so open and flat across NE IN/NW Ohio. To combine that with what will be a more powdery snow on Thursday & gusty winds into Friday, this part of the country is going to be absolutely shut down for days. I think drifts approaching 10' in some spots is not out of the question

Tab2FileL.png?239328a6524f70d3fade151a1324906c

When I was in LAF and we had 17" in the Feb 2007 storm, I recall there being 10 foot drifts in the outlying areas.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RCNYILWX said:

I'd call initial inversion heights sub marginal. Since you will certainly be saturated and have good synoptic forcing with right jet entrance region, the enhancement will probably be of speed convergence variety for the most part. As delta T and instability improves and inversion heights come up to or above 850 mb, then it's more marginal to conditional with continued speed convergence onto land. Because there's synoptic forcing in addition to boost in low level lift from the lake, I'd expect a modest boost in totals due to lake enhancement, maybe 1-3, 2-4" type stuff?

Last Feb actually didn't have great inversion heights, but synoptic lift and lake induced instability and convergence resulted in lift being centered in deep DGZ. This doesn't have nearly as favorable a setup but it's not nothing for a time. Jan 31, 2021 actually had pretty good lake enhancement despite marginal inversion heights, for example.

Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk
 

Thanks for weighing in.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We may be in nowcasting territory but the 18z NAM has a fascinating band now in place Hours 18-24 across N. MO / S. IA -ish area that the 12z didn't have before. Could lend some credence to the higher amounts north of Chicago a la the HRRR/RAP/etc. Anyways...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Kaner88 said:

We may be in nowcasting territory but the 18z NAM has a fascinating band now in place Hours 18-24 across N. MO / S. IA -ish area that the 12z didn't have before. Could lend some credence to the higher amounts north of Chicago a la the HRRR/RAP/etc. Anyways...

yep thats a 2 inch in 3hour band for chicago south and east

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some thoughts on locations closer to northwest edge of precip shield:

In synoptic precip events, being in the favorable right entrance region of the upper jet is a factor that tends to result in a more expensive precip shield to the north and west. Unfortunately, we have the very dry incoming Arctic air mass to counteract that, so this is of a question of whether synoptic lift can overcome the dryness 850 mb and below.

Most model guidance has the 700 mb front (and maximum h7 f-gen) separated well to the north from the 850 mb front (and maximum h8 f-gen). Because of this, I suspect that there will be multiple embedded mesoscale bands tonight into Wednesday, with a decent shot at two dual dominant bands.

You look to the warm side of the maximized f-gen to where you would get the most intense mesoscale bands. This is one of the more challenging aspects of winter forecasting. But with consistent northern position of H7 front and f-gen and large separation from H8, I'm leaning toward there being a strong f-gen band positioned not far distance wise from the northwest edge of the precip field.

The presence of strong fgen also tends to sharpen this gradient, so it might not end up too far between warning level snow amounts to much lower amounts to little if any snow.

The hope for areas consistently right on the northwest fringe is that the dry air influence is being overdone a bit, allowing large scale (jet entrance region) and mesoscale (f-gen and low stability to unstable conditions in the DGZ) to overcome the dryness.

For the above reasons, I was definitely in agreement with the midnight shift issuing the warnings for areas left in watch and including DuPage and Kendall in the warning, with a tier north/west of that in advisory. If the models are much overdone with the dry air influence, will have to watch for banding to set up decently farther north than expected. The opposite can be true as well regarding the dry air.

Will be interesting to track obs and radar this evening to see how this all unfolds.

Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk



  • Like 4
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...