DDweatherman Posted January 25, 2022 Share Posted January 25, 2022 1 minute ago, LP08 said: Only minor but the NS SW is diving in a little further east than 6z. Disagree, digging in a bit further west Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LP08 Posted January 25, 2022 Share Posted January 25, 2022 Just now, DDweatherman said: Disagree, digging in a bit further west The first one through MT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
87storms Posted January 25, 2022 Share Posted January 25, 2022 looks a little better so far...slightly west'er/more consolidated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interstate Posted January 25, 2022 Share Posted January 25, 2022 1 minute ago, DDweatherman said: Disagree, digging in a bit further west Yeah I think I am liking it so far Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 25, 2022 Share Posted January 25, 2022 At 60, again, tail vort just a hair east of 6z. Northern stream better angle, just by a hair but noticeable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDweatherman Posted January 25, 2022 Share Posted January 25, 2022 I don’t hate it thru 60, shouldn’t be worse not that it matters relative to 6z Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 25, 2022 Share Posted January 25, 2022 Again, by 66, northern stream is noticeable better dig 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDweatherman Posted January 25, 2022 Share Posted January 25, 2022 This one will be a great example of showing how much implication these minor changes early on have downstream Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted January 25, 2022 Share Posted January 25, 2022 I hope the analysis of the GFS is better than it was for the ICON. The ICON was an improvement 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 25, 2022 Share Posted January 25, 2022 Changes in trof orientation and NS are better so far 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDweatherman Posted January 25, 2022 Share Posted January 25, 2022 Just now, WinterWxLuvr said: I hope the analysis of the GFS is better than it was for the ICON. The ICON was an improvement In the end, yes. But early on I’m going to bet against a closed off energy in the four corners resulting in a coastal hit for our area…which is correct Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 25, 2022 Share Posted January 25, 2022 Just now, WinterWxLuvr said: I hope the analysis of the GFS is better than it was for the ICON. The ICON was an improvement The rookies here are killing me 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ravens94 Posted January 25, 2022 Share Posted January 25, 2022 Gfs will be better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 25, 2022 Share Posted January 25, 2022 Yes, this run will be an improvement. Just don't get your hopes up. I'm trying to conservative and right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowenOutThere Posted January 25, 2022 Share Posted January 25, 2022 Probably still going to have a good bit of the southwest energy left behind but an improvement over 6z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scraff Posted January 25, 2022 Share Posted January 25, 2022 Just now, stormtracker said: The rookies here are killing me Don’t mind them. You and DD bring it home! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 25, 2022 Share Posted January 25, 2022 Undoubtedly better, leaving less tail behind. Trough is deeper and better angled. But again, let's not get all googly yet 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDweatherman Posted January 25, 2022 Share Posted January 25, 2022 I’ll defer to Randy, I like h72… Rome wasn’t built in a day so no guarantees we get a nice outcome verbatim, but these were good trends for sure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chase Posted January 25, 2022 Share Posted January 25, 2022 5 minutes ago, stormtracker said: Did ya hear? We lost Meatloaf That Amtrak wifi must've delayed the news aleet. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
87storms Posted January 25, 2022 Share Posted January 25, 2022 2 minutes ago, DDweatherman said: In the end, yes. But early on I’m going to bet against a closed off energy in the four corners resulting in a coastal hit for our area…which is correct the northern piece is the one to pay attention to imo. want that to dive in further west/south (which looks like it is slightly doing so far). 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteoutMD Posted January 25, 2022 Share Posted January 25, 2022 2 minutes ago, WinterWxLuvr said: I hope the analysis of the GFS is better than it was for the ICON. The ICON was an improvement agree almost tries to close off but then opens back up it was close Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 25, 2022 Share Posted January 25, 2022 Just now, DDweatherman said: I’ll defer to Randy, I like h72… Ram wasn’t built in a day so no guarantees we get a nice outcome verbatim, but these were good trends for sure It's better by a good bit, I just don't wanna get people's hopes up. It's just not clear yet this is what we need. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solution Man Posted January 25, 2022 Share Posted January 25, 2022 Should we begin brining? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted January 25, 2022 Share Posted January 25, 2022 GFS has to be better 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDweatherman Posted January 25, 2022 Share Posted January 25, 2022 Just now, 87storms said: the northern piece is the one to pay attention imo. want that to dive in further west/south (which looks like it is slightly doing so far). Agree but in order for good trends there to have play for us, we’d need that interaction with the southern vort to be cleaner than some of the runs that take it wide right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clskinsfan Posted January 25, 2022 Share Posted January 25, 2022 It should bring the goods on the front end this run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SomeguyfromTakomaPark Posted January 25, 2022 Share Posted January 25, 2022 Better phasing at 72....please be enough for us! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 25, 2022 Share Posted January 25, 2022 SFC low developing closer to the coast vs 6z 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maestrobjwa Posted January 25, 2022 Share Posted January 25, 2022 1 minute ago, Solution Man said: Should we begin brining? Briny the Elder is forbidden until we know more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowenOutThere Posted January 25, 2022 Share Posted January 25, 2022 Definitely looks a lot better on H5 on multiple fronts compared to 6z. Hope these improvements reach the surface. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts