Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

February 2022 Obs/Disco


Torch Tiger
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, ORH_wxman said:

It’s probably struggling with the tropical forcing for sure. Typically when LR models are way off, I’ve often noticed them trying to go with some big tropical forcing and then it just ends up weaker than they thought and other factors override it. I wonder if the euro is trying to push the forcing into unfavorable areas but keeps getting rejected by reality….I haven’t looked super close at the MJO/convection progs in the last week but I do know that the GEFS and EPS were differing there.  

I thought they were both pretty much in agreement on emerging in phase 3...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

Judge what? I think you are being clouded by recent memory bias. 

Okay...what do you average,  35-40"? List your seasonal totals past 4 years...this year you must already be exceeding average. I'm 40" below for starters...let's revisit last year. I ended up with 51" with just about 63" avg.

  • Like 1
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Okay...what do you average,  35-40"? List your seasonal totals past 4 years...this year you must already be exceeding average. I'm 40" below for starters...let's revisit last year. I ended up with 51" with just about 63" avg.

There’s no way he averages high 30s… I average low 40s… he’s gotta be high 40 anyway.

His area has done pretty well though, if there’s a big storm, expect Weymouth to be near the top of accums

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CoastalWx said:

Actually it may be a bit more than that because Hingham is almost 53" Although not sure how the "M" counts in those. 

 

Anyways going back to 1960..."Ms" or not, but whatever...you have a good sample size...the avg there is 50". So I might be a tick better.

Sounds right. I tend to mistakenly refer back to when Boston averaged around 42" for a long time, but it's gone up.  Anyway, all I meant was I am sure you are safely above average in the aggregate over past 4 seasons. From you, to Will to Steve has been on a heater.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Off the top of my head, I would say the ratter year of 2019-2020 is the exception. While still well below average with about 48", I did better than you did mostly bc of the 12/2019 event. 2018-2019 you also did better...I had 44".

I guess you are looking back at some big events and comparing, but I've had some tough ones. Hell even the March 2018 blizzard sort of screwed me with 16" as I got caught in a subby zone.

I get when looking at it from a "normal" snowfall standpoint it has screwed you moreso, but this area has a much larger standard deviation for snowfalls. So given that, one would expect some variation and it gets tougher to use normal snowfall for a comparison.

I will say we have been fortunate at times, I don't dispute that and I'm sure the tide will turn. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CoastalWx said:

I guess you are looking back at some big events and comparing, but I've had some tough ones. Hell even the March 2018 blizzard sort of screwed me with 16" as I got caught in a subby zone.

I get when looking at it from a "normal" snowfall standpoint it has screwed you moreso, but this area has a much larger standard deviation for snowfalls. So given that, one would expect some variation and it gets tougher to use normal snowfall for a comparison.

I will say we have been fortunate at times, I don't dispute that and I'm sure the tide will turn. 

Agree 100% with this post. Great point about larger SD, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, George001 said:

High 40s or so, not terrible but not great either. This winter so far I’m in the low 30s, which is very good for this time of the year. On pace to finish in the high 50s to low 60s.

I thought you did better, but makes since since you got boned some on 2/1. The gravy train last year was a bit NW of you, near Will.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I thought you did better, but makes since since you got boned some on 2/1. The gravy train last year was a bit NW of you, near Will.

Yeah my area to ORH was above average last year. I had like 70”…ORH had 77”. They got nearly 10” in the 12/5 event when I got 4” which was the difference in our season…though even my 4” was pretty good in that one as most of the areas east of me got 1-2” of slop. 
 

It should be noted that ORH is running way below average this season. They got less than you did in the 1/29 event. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

Actually it may be a bit more than that because Hingham is almost 53" Although not sure how the "M" counts in those. 

 

Anyways going back to 1960..."Ms" or not, but whatever...you have a good sample size...the avg there is 50". So I might be a tick better.

I can't believe Hingham averages that much, I'm pretty sure Greenfield only averages 60".  The Valley robs so surrounding hilltowns are probably 10-15" more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

Yeah my area to ORH was above average last year. I had like 70”…ORH had 77”. They got nearly 10” in the 12/5 event when I got 4” which was the difference in our season…though even my 4” was pretty good in that one as most of the areas east of me got 1-2” of slop. 
 

It should be noted that ORH is running way below average this season. They got less than you did in the 1/29 event. 

 

Dave in Hubbardston is at 29" which I would think is probably fairly below average for YTD for N ORH Co.

Only about 16" here so far...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Its almost like they have kept trying to default to torch la nina climo, which was never a good idea with an east-based event.

Which would be an interesting trick considering the atmosphere has apparently divorced it's self from the La Nina ocean ... now dating back three weeks.  ... according to CPCs analysis -

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, TheSnowman said:

Judging by the conversation, as I wait to get off the plane Back for the first time in 3 weeks, it SEEMS there are No threats at all....

 

Outside of this GOD AWFUL Rain & Fog right now out the window Melting the Snow!!  

Correct. Just a bunch of hopes and wishes for two shortwaves to somehow come together in time to get naked on vday without mother Hadley Cell’s presence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, weathafella said:

BOS new 30 year normal is 48.

Ray thinks he has the climate of Concord while Scooter that of Hyannis.

Jerry, I stated what my average is, so I'm not sure where your confusion lies. People love to imply it's in my head, blah, blah, but everytime I ask someone to list the seasonal totals for Weymouth area compared to average the past 4 seasons, no one ever does it.  If it's in my head, then prove it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...