stormtracker Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 1 minute ago, psuhoffman said: @stormtracker this feature isn’t doing us any favors. It’s preventing the key SW behind it from amplifying by flattening the flow some right in front. Simply it’s not enough wave spacing. We’re now at a range it’s safe to say that’s real but the timing can adjust. Weaker and faster with that feature is better imo. Slower and stronger with the next SW is better. Increase the spacing between those SWs would help. Kill it. Kill it with fire. Seriously though, there's a lot of hoops we gotta jump through. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 The only way that would work would take a crazy ridiculous capture and tuck scenario off the SE coast that’s VERY rare. The simpler path, and we do better with simple, is for the energy not to split and have the NS just phase with the further west stj wave in the gulf. Then we don’t need as radical a trough amplification to win. It worked yesterday at 18z Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted January 24, 2022 Author Share Posted January 24, 2022 9 minutes ago, psuhoffman said: @stormtracker this feature isn’t doing us any favors. It’s preventing the key SW behind it from amplifying by flattening the flow some right in front. Simply it’s not enough wave spacing. We’re now at a range it’s safe to say that’s real but the timing can adjust. Weaker and faster with that feature is better imo. Slower and stronger with the next SW is better. Increase the spacing between those SWs would help. That’s the part I said needed to get stuck in the four corners Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted January 24, 2022 Author Share Posted January 24, 2022 ICON is different. Looks better to me but who knows how it plays out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 1 minute ago, Ji said: It worked yesterday at 18z It left some energy behind but the NS still dig far enough west to initiate cyclogenesis with that wave in the gulf. And then it still took one of the most ridiculous bomb/capture/tuck scenarios I’ve ever seen and we were still on the western fringe. You really want to roll that way? You know how close that was (basically a slightly less extreme capture tuck) from an end result identical to a certain Nina storm we don’t even mention around here! We really want a storm coming at us from the SW or SSW. If we need something to be pulled in from our east we’re in bad shape. That’s a losing scenario 99% of the time. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 4 minutes ago, WinterWxLuvr said: ICON is different. Looks better to me but who knows how it plays out Super wide right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 I'm so sick of typing wide right. 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowfan96 Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 Icon was a big step in the wrong direction at h5. 18z was pretty close. But 0z left almost all the evert behind and went back to the pure miller b idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 GFS starting up. Good luck to us all. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted January 24, 2022 Author Share Posted January 24, 2022 8 minutes ago, stormtracker said: Super wide right I was wrong lol. But this whole evolution is just strange. Regardless, it ain’t working Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDsnowPRO Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 Que Bob Uecker…. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 So GFS looks a bit better at 90 at h5. Not jump out at you better, but you can def tell the flow out front is better 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 Less elongated trough also Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 1 minute ago, stormtracker said: So GFS looks a bit better at 90 at h5. Not jump out at you better, but you can def tell the flow out front is better the sw in the sw is actually ahead of the Sw diving in now instead of behind it. probably wont make a difference but any change is good lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scraff Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 Just now, stormtracker said: Less elongated trough also Let’s Go Randy! Clap clap clap clap! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 Much better in front of the trough vs 18z. Definite improvement vs 18z. can't reach any conclusions yet tho.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 randy has probably already type "wid.. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 Regardless if it works out or not, there are marked changes vs 18z..so, at least there's that 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted January 24, 2022 Author Share Posted January 24, 2022 It has to end better. It has to lol. At 96 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 Just now, stormtracker said: Regardless if it works out or not, there are marked changes vs 18z..so, at least there's that it looks way better than then icon...but the icon has been the worst model for this storm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted January 24, 2022 Author Share Posted January 24, 2022 1 minute ago, stormtracker said: Regardless if it works out or not, there are marked changes vs 18z..so, at least there's that Agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 Like night and day over the East vs 18z 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amped Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 Better than 12 or 18z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nj2va Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 It looks better at 117 but not sure its enough to matter. Regardless I like that its different than 18z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 Closer..but no cigar. Right. 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 2 minutes ago, stormtracker said: Like night and day over the East vs 18z i give up. No matter who different its the same crappy as solution. If its not initiating a Gulf low---we are fooked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowLover22 Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 1 minute ago, stormtracker said: Closer..but no cigar. Right. does it hit anyone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 3 minutes ago, WinterWxLuvr said: Agree. Much less elongation/tail, but it's still gumming up the works Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scraff Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 Just now, stormtracker said: Closer..but no cigar. Right. My cheering has been withdrawn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts