Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,613
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Vesuvius
    Newest Member
    Vesuvius
    Joined

Arctic cold and new threat emerges for the 26th. Patience Grasshoppers.


Ginx snewx
 Share

Recommended Posts

Talked about that all day yesterday and the 00z runs did little to help unfortunately...

wave space contentions plague the late mid/ext range, muddling/obscuring whatever signals are out there. 

The best fit is still the 24th... but, the 22nd is still in play.   There is an ambrosia of different aspects that leap out for me:

-- typically in a two+ wave contention scenario out in time, one or the other will emerge as the main player in future cycles. This is more complex than just that, because the 22nd has different causal roots than a would-be 24th.

-- the evolution of the flow from south the Alaska to the Maritime of Canada evolves to be gradient rich. The compression that implies is not allowing anything to manifest from the NP-OV-MA/NE-Maritime of Canada, per the 00z cycle, in either of the operational Euro/GFS.  I am not sure that is right ... it may be.  This is a separate matter to the first bullet above.  It represents a large scale vs smaller scale, negative interference ... a commonly found attribute in recent winters frankly but won't get into that - ...  I have found that events can "hide" in the hurried maelstrom of those types of latter mid range flow constructs, but start emerging over future cycles as fast movers. 

-- yet, I will add another aspect...  

image.png.47bf0757c999a829b8f120ac5f7bf43f.png

Those are top down, the EPS, GEFS and GEPS means, and they mature coherent +PNA --> +PNAP flow structure, a modulation that typically precedes storm genesis over eastern N/A.

The reason I've been leaning more 24th is that timing above lands on 23rd, and the next day in all these, that trough subtending through the Lakes amplifies pretty smartly down stream of that obvious +PNA flex.  The scaffold of the hemisphere is thus favoring the 24th - however, there are small systems that can materialize that are not anchored in such larger scaled modalities.  The 00z Euro's 22nd is one such suggestion... it more than less squirts out ahead of that larger cog work.  Those are trickier to gauge out in time, particularly in fast flows that are compressing below an elephant's ass of an SPV.

 

 

 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Talked about that all day yesterday and the 00z runs did little to help unfortunately...

wave space contentions plague the late mid/ext range, muddling/obscuring whatever signals are out there. 

The best fit is still the 24th... but, the 22nd is still in play.   There is an ambrosia of different aspects that leap out for me:

-- typically in a two+ wave contention scenario out in time, one or the other will emerge as the main player in future cycles. This is may be more complex than just that, because the 22nd has different causal roots than a would-be 24th.

-- the evolution of the flow from south the Alaska to the Maritime of Canada evolves to be gradient rich. The compression that implies is not allowing anything to manifest from the NP-OV-MA/NE-Maritime of Canada, per the 00z cycle, in either of the operational Euro/GFS.  I am not sure that is right ... it may be.  This is a separate matter to the first bullet above.  It represents a large scale vs smaller scale, negative interference ... a commonly found attribute in recent winters frankly but won't get into that - ...  I have found that events can "hide" in the hurried maelstrom of those types of latter mid range flow constructs, but start emerging over future cycles as fast movers. 

-- yet, I will add another aspect...  

image.png.47bf0757c999a829b8f120ac5f7bf43f.png

Those are top down, the EPS, GEFS and GEPS means, and they mature coherent +PNA --> +PNAP flow structure, a modulation that typically precedes storm genesis over eastern N/A.

The reason I've been leaning more 24th is that timing above lands on 23rd, and the next day in all these, that trough subtending through the Lakes amplifies pretty smartly down stream of that obvious +PNA flex.  The scaffold of the hemisphere is thus favoring the 24th - however, there are small systems that can materialize that are not anchored in such larger scaled modalities.  The 00z Euro's 22nd is one such suggestion... it more than less squirts out ahead of that larger cog work.  Those are trickier to gauge out in time, particularly in fast flows that are compressing below an elephant's ass of an SPV.

 

 

 

Your time frame shows colder temps as well( for now), we watch......thanks Tip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ORH_wxman said:

06z EPS trying for 1/22-23 but a little wide right on the mean. You can see plenty of westward members though. 
 

 

957E0319-3DFD-4967-AAAC-567D64536017.png

B6F1A313-D207-4CF0-8EC6-3D9AE398A32B.png

Yep, definitely an OTS risk but far from decided, there's certainly a decent cluster that likes a benchmark-esque track.

w3AeMzK.gif

wkrekdv.gif

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah.. haha. .. just read the ext. forecast discussion and there headline sums it up nicely!

Extended Forecast Discussion NWS Weather Prediction Center College Park MD 1149 PM EST Sun Jan 16 2022 Valid 12Z Thu Jan 20 2022 - 12Z Mon Jan 24 2022 ...Cooled Deep South to East Coast Snow/Ice threats with uncertain wave genesis pattern...

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, JC-CT said:

Agree, we'd need to see a decent correction for that one - not impossible, but need to see it pretty soon. I was more referring to the 23rd-25th period

Ya I’m thinking the 24th or 25th might be a bit more conducive…but it’s still out there, and modeling is gonna jump around on which one to key in on at this stage obviously. At least it’s active with cold around. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, WinterWolf said:

Yup. But Wave spacing didn’t look to good for this dog shit either..and then it did. The problem is it cut west. 

Yeah well I’m not counting on a repeat of a miraculous phase again to turn this due north. 
 

Euro looks pretty decent at 114h for the 1/22 threat. I’d like to see more guidance jump on it though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

Yeah well I’m not counting on a repeat of a miraculous phase again to turn this due north. 
 

Euro looks pretty decent at 114h for the 1/22 threat. I’d like to see more guidance jump on it though. 

Me neither. The only point was, there’s wave spacing issues way out in time, until there isn’t. Like just now lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...