Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,611
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

January 20-22 “bring the mojo” winter storm threat


lilj4425
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, kgar2121 said:

Professional lurker here (10 posts in 12 years, I just enjoy reading the insightful posts), and was wondering if we have a "mute" option that we could turn on.  You know, where the same broken record keeps posting, you can mute them from your own personal view, not the entire board.  Have seen that option on other message boards, and I think it would be most useful here.  Ok, I'm finished posting... until next year or the year after :)

Hi from another long-time lurker! You can ignore a poster - upper right-hand corner, click the down arrow next to your username, choose Ignored Users. Add the person's username.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PackGrad05 said:

At this point I'm looking at high-res short-term models anyway.  NAM 3K and 12K look great.  

Trends I will admit do not look good, but there can always be surprises at nowcast time.  I'm pretty skeptical for us back here in the western piedmont, but anywhere east of Burlington I would not give up.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, PackGrad05 said:

Allan's current forecast is completely reasonable based on the data.  You don't make changes to your forecast after each little run.  You look at the overall details of each model and watch for trends and you use what you know about meteorology to determine the forecast.  

Of course you can't just take the models on their own and make a forecast, but there is certainly an established trend here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All the established mets have probably been bit by the NW trend so many times that they're pricing that into all forecasts going forward. They're betting that later guidance will wind-shield wiper back to more qpf-rich solutions, which is reasonable. How about let's get the 3km  NAM past 00z Saturday before we really start cliff diving.

  • Like 10
  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, TARHEELPROGRAMMER88 said:

I see the models trending back to more moisture this evening and overnight. Book it.

This actually wouldn't surprise me one bit. Early Jan '17 storm did the same thing for Hampton Roads. Was supposed to be a light to moderate event, if my memory serves me right we were even calling ~2-4 inches in the Navy weather office ~24 hours out with models having gone back and forth with moisture. The morning of the event the models flipped to more moisture and Norfolk ended up with 9 inches (more in spots). Ain't over till its over.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ILMRoss said:

All the established mets have probably been bit by the NW trend so many times that they're pricing that into all forecasts going forward. They're betting that later guidance will wind-shield wiper back to more qpf-rich solutions, which is reasonable. How about let's get the 3km  NAM past 00z Saturday before we really start cliff diving.

And The model GOAT …. HRRR …. It was on an island of its own when Burrel started pumping it last Sat eve And it scored may as well give it a shot in our what have you done lately era 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a thing of beauty for me. I'm on the OBX in Kitty Hawk and each run is getting better and better.

I'm a long-time lurker and rarely post. I'm not a Met and not as big a hobbyist as most of you are. I'm just a lowly CPA. I've lived in NC all of my life and am 55 so I've seen a fair number of storms.

My anecdotal experience is that these storms rarely pan out as modeled outside of 24-48 hrs. The models aren't perfect! You all know that and then act like it is some big surprise when the models show a shift. Then there are some on here, especially the IMBYers, that bitch and moan when the model shifts the axis of precipitation by 25 or 50 miles. In my way of thinking, that's not a big shift. A storm is hundreds of miles from here, being sampled numerous times a day and if it shifts from your backyard, you proclaim the models suck. I'm not sure we'll ever see in our lifetimes where a weather model can consistently and accurately predict the exact track, the exact precip type and exact amounts of precip. Yet it seems to me that is what some of you expect and demand. The models are Lucy and some of you are Charlie Brown.

Let's take a step back from the IMBYism that is too prevalent with some posters and look at the overall bigger picture.

The models were showing a week ago a significant winter event for our area, with snow generally in the central part of the state and ice in the eastern part. As of now, it seems like that is generally going to happen though it may be further east and north of what was initially shown. To me, that's a pretty big win even if the track is off 100 miles or so and the precip is 50% of what was modeled.

Sorry for my rant but the attitudes and expectations of some of you are completely unreasonable in my humble opinion. I'll return to lurking now.

  • Like 11
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, PantherJustin said:

And The model GOAT …. HRRR …. It was on an island of its own when Burrel started pumping it last Sat eve And it scored may as well give it a shot in our what have you done lately era 

Yeah, I typically like trying to have the memory of a goldfish when assessing models but I understand some upstate folks really cashed out on that last storm. Upstate folks: some detail/context on what models were good, what models sucked, etc for that situation would be greatly appreciated if you can provide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, jlh said:

This actually wouldn't surprise me one bit. Early Jan '17 storm did the same thing for Hampton Roads. Was supposed to be a light to moderate event, if my memory serves me right we were even calling ~2-4 inches in the Navy weather office ~24 hours out with models having gone back and forth with moisture. The morning of the event the models flipped to more moisture and Norfolk ended up with 9 inches (more in spots). Ain't over till its over.

Yep, its why i don't give up but also don't get too overhyped with these events anymore.  Heck, just last weekend i was supposed to get close to an inch of freezing rain with a dusting to an inch of snow/sleet.  Ended up getting around 3 inches of snow/sleet and just a very brief glaze of freezing rain.  Won't really know what its going to do until the flakes start falling...or not falling

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WRAL 12PM Update:
 

Wednesday 12 p.m. update: Good news for Triangle snow lovers

WRAL meteorologist Aimee Wilmoth said conditions this weekend are looking good for snow lovers but bad for road conditions.

"I am leaning toward more snow for the Triangle," Wilmoth said, adding that she has adjusted the winter weather map showing in blue (snow), pink (sleet) and green (freezing rain) what type of precipitation will fall where on Friday.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, PackGrad05 said:

WRAL 12PM Update:
 

Wednesday 12 p.m. update: Good news for Triangle snow lovers

WRAL meteorologist Aimee Wilmoth said conditions this weekend are looking good for snow lovers but bad for road conditions.

"I am leaning toward more snow for the Triangle," Wilmoth said, adding that she has adjusted the winter weather map showing in blue (snow), pink (sleet) and green (freezing rain) what type of precipitation will fall where on Friday.

I guess everyone is banking on more expansive precip shield. Interesting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me be clear- these are not imby posts. This has shifted from Blacksburg Virginia to oriental NC in 24 hours. You’re talking hundreds of miles and also even in the heaviest areas just a fraction of the QPF outputs from yesterday. This is not saying trends aren’t good for some on the board. Down east folks looking good for sure

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as the NW side has fizzled out in the last few runs, don’t believe that’s impossible to undo. Especially with these same models that fail at consistency most of the time. Would I trust them showing a big storm 48 hours out? Probably not. Why trust the opposite? This seems to be a wonky timeframe for models anyway, in my limited experience. 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, PackGrad05 said:

WRAL 12PM Update:
 

Wednesday 12 p.m. update: Good news for Triangle snow lovers

WRAL meteorologist Aimee Wilmoth said conditions this weekend are looking good for snow lovers but bad for road conditions.

"I am leaning toward more snow for the Triangle," Wilmoth said, adding that she has adjusted the winter weather map showing in blue (snow), pink (sleet) and green (freezing rain) what type of precipitation will fall where on Friday.

Funny how they start hyping things when the models start going south.  Meanwhile, Greg Fishel posted on Facebook a few minutes ago we might not even see that much precipitation now. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Brick Tamland said:

Funny how they start hyping things when the models start going south.  Meanwhile, Greg Fishel posted on Facebook a few minutes ago we might not even see that much precipitation now. 

Fishel flip flops as the models go

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...