Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,792
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    manaja
    Newest Member
    manaja
    Joined

MLK 2022 Storm Potential


stormtracker
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, jon_snow said:

guyz give it to me straight, is this storm a bust for DCA?

Yes! DC south and east get an inch or two of snow - at best - then it quickly turns to rain, and almost as quickly ends. Even the areas west, closer to I-81 will receive less than currently advertised.

The trends among nearly all of the guidance has been for a stronger system with a sfc low track farther west. This results in an inevitably minor event, esp. for the I-95 corridor and most of the Shenandoah Valley as well.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 5
  • Weenie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Snowfan96 said:

Yes! DC south and east get an inch or two of snow - at best - then it quickly turns to rain, and almost as quickly ends. Even the areas west, closer to I-81 will receive less than currently advertised.

The trends among nearly all of guidance has been for a stronger system with a sfc low track farther west. This results in an inevitably minor event, esp. for the I-95 coordior and most of the Shenandoah Valley as well.

 

 

You may end up right, but the current guidance (GFS and Euro) show a pretty significant event in the Shenandoah Valley.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Snowfan96 said:

Yes! DC south and east get an inch or two of snow - at best - then it quickly turns to rain, and almost as quickly ends. Even the areas west, closer to I-81 will receive less than currently advertised.

The trends among nearly all of guidance has been for a stronger system with a sfc low track farther west. This results in an inevitably minor event, esp. for the I-95 coordior and most of the Shenandoah Valley as well.

 

 

Minor event for the Shenandoah Valley?? Ok Deb..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Snowfan96 said:

I can almost guarantee the majority of 00z guidance will start to fall more in line with the 18z NAM. The NAM is consistently under-valued in these scenarios.

 

The NAM is undervalued at 84 hr with numerous upper air features and phasing at play? How, exactly? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Snowfan96 said:

My only point is the NAM doesn’t get enough credit, esp. in these types of scenarios/set-ups. It tends to be more reliable and accurate than many have come to believe.

You must be new here. Every been NAM'ed? Around here we go with the snowiest model as gospel. During a good NAM'ing we bow to "king NAM" lol. Anyway.. GFS time. Sorry for banter. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Snowfan96 said:

My only point is the NAM doesn’t get enough credit, esp. in these types of scenarios/set-ups. It tends to be more reliable and accurate than many have come to believe.

        This is true, but when the GFS and NAM have large synoptic differences at longer ranges, it's not often that the NAM will be correct.    It's simply a lot to ask of *any* regional model to nail synoptic details beyond day 2.

         One the snyoptics align, one should absolutely use the NAM (and preferably the NAM Nest) for temperatures and important mesoscale details.

  • Like 8
  • Thanks 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NAM could be right, but I have no idea why any I-81 folks would freak out. The GFS and Euro have showed adjustments here and there almost every run for 48 hours now and the end result is literally the exact same each time. Like Bobchill said, it seems like the tracks are laid down and the storm has nowhere to go but along the tracks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...