Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,792
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    manaja
    Newest Member
    manaja
    Joined

MLK 2022 Storm Potential


stormtracker
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Ralph Wiggum said:

There have to be some members that follow the weakness though, from Greenville up over Philly looks like where it probably wanted to end up. Dynamics as it stacks likely cause interference of convective nature out closer to where the surface low ended up this run.

Where's WW with his percentage maps of the gefs? :lol:

 

He's napping on his job

  • Like 2
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wrt the NW track. It can happen and I do expect a pretty sharp N turn when it gets captured and phases but that on the 18z Gfs is overdone Imo.  But before even getting into that it was a better run. Look at 96 hours v 12z 

3EEF6BB6-EF27-43DF-846B-909364645BE0.thumb.gif.773831fb840ef5bb59d24658b9c78d88.gif

I’ll take that improvement at 96 v the wonky stuff it does later. The question is was that pretty radical NW jump from va beach to Hagerstown correct. I’d bet against it. Something like SE VA up the Chesapeake is more believable and that would have an enormous impact on the ground results in DC and Baltimore. Much less low level warm air surging in and provably would hold into snow a couple more hours which can mean 2-3 more inches. Plus sleet and dry slot v driving rain after.
 

That’s not just a wag it’s based on the analogs to this setup where the upper low tracked similar to this and the surface low got into SE VA. The turn north was never that radical. The two 1994 storms for example, started in a similar spot and never got that far west. Both tracked up the bay or just east of it. Btw the first 94 storm had a much worse antecedent airmass so a similar track would yield better results. I think this has better antecedent conditions than the second 94 storm also.   If that 96 hour Gfs plot is right I’d bet on a track through southeast VA then up the southern bay across northern DE and near Philly.   That’s still west of ideal but that would avoid the spike into the 40s with heavy rain in the cities. Despite a slightly worse airmass that didn’t happen with the second 94 storm either.   I got about 6” in western Fairfax county with a lot of sleet then a dryslot and temps stayed in the 30s. Didn’t lose any snow really. 

  • Like 9
  • Thanks 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Always in Zugzwang said:

Not saying that it will happen or be the ultimate solution.  But it's not like the GFS is doing something "non physical" here.  If there's a shortwave on its heels phasing in at that time, it pulls the system NW as we see.  @psuhoffman and others have hammered that point several times.

See my post above 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Ralph Wiggum said:

There have to be some members that follow the weakness though, from Greenville up over Philly looks like where it probably wanted to end up. Dynamics as it stacks likely cause interference of convective nature out closer to where the surface low ended up this run.

That’s the track I expected too. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, SnowenOutThere said:

\prateptype_cat.us_ma.thumb.png.49a0c5714ed83a750ffba8e659dfcd36.png

Approximate track of the surface low from 99-108. Would be a unique storm track for sure. 

Sure, we'll be on the west side of the eye but hard to imagine that the hurricane-force winds will still be causing trouble by the time it gets to DC.

(Crap, I see I stopped changing my wall calendar five months ago.)

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was a solid adjustment from the GFS after gleaning over it. Ignore the developed ptype algorithm maps for the time being. Soundings tell the story and climo wise we're beginning to see how this would usually shape up. The wall of snow is still well within reason. I-81 corridor still favored, but the metros will not get shutout. I love the cold antecedent airmass leading in too. I have no changes to what I've made previously. 

  • Like 17
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

Wrt the NW track. It can happen and I do expect a pretty sharp N turn when it gets captured and phases but that on the 18z Gfs is overdone Imo.  But before even getting into that it was a better run. Look at 96 hours v 12z 

3EEF6BB6-EF27-43DF-846B-909364645BE0.thumb.gif.773831fb840ef5bb59d24658b9c78d88.gif

I’ll take that improvement at 96 v the wonky stuff it does later. The question is was that pretty radical NW jump from va beach to Hagerstown correct. I’d bet against it. Something like SE VA up the Chesapeake is more believable and that would have an enormous impact on the ground results in DC and Baltimore. Much less low level warm air surging in and provably would hold into snow a couple more hours which can mean 2-3 more inches. Plus sleet and dry slot v driving rain after.
 

That’s not just a wag it’s based on the analogs to this setup where the upper low tracked similar to this and the surface low got into SE VA. The turn north was never that radical. The two 1994 storms for example, started in a similar spot and never got that far west. Both tracked up the bay or just east of it. Btw the first 94 storm had a much worse antecedent airmass so a similar track would yield better results. I think this has better antecedent conditions than the second 94 storm also.   If that 96 hour Gfs plot is right I’d bet on a track through southeast VA then up the southern bay across northern DE and near Philly.   That’s still west of ideal but that would avoid the spike into the 40s with heavy rain in the cities. Despite a slightly worse airmass that didn’t happen with the second 94 storm either.   I got about 6” in western Fairfax county with a lot of sleet then a dryslot and temps stayed in the 30s. Didn’t lose any snow really. 

Joe B keeps saying March, 1994 is an analog.

FI7DniaXEAII3Uw?format=png&name=900x900

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

History of similar synoptic situations says something like this is more likely 

E3ED5BF5-4E0F-40C2-96B1-3FBF7EF805A7.jpeg

GEFS supports that in all honesty. I cant ever remember a track like the GFS is spitting out. The GEFS would be a classic bomb for just about everyone in here. Except the Eastern Shore folks. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, WEATHER53 said:

I think we’ve seen just about all the possibilities so will be time to replay all the possible outcomes thru Friday.

The cold high will again be the determinant and we need about 30.20+ to keep the low from moving due north .  30.00 at game time won’t do it. 

 

To be fair over the last 36 hours all the solutions among the more reliable globals have been between a coastal hugger and an inside runner. They all track the low somewhere through central or eastern NC and at our latitude between the Delmarva and Dulles. For 120 hours away that’s remarkably narrow goalposts imo.  It’s just that we’re on a razors edge between a significant snowstorm or something less impactful. But 30 years ago we likely would be looking at goalposts between Indiana and Bermuda for the track at 5 days out!  We’re now talking about details at day 5 we couldn’t imagine at day 2 when I first got into this game.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, clskinsfan said:

GEFS supports that in all honesty. I cant ever remember a track like the GFS is spitting out. The GEFS would be a classic bomb for just about everyone in here. Except the Eastern Shore folks. 

Us in five hours: “whoa - never seen a jump from the nc/sc border to Bismarck before!”

  • Like 1
  • Haha 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...