TSSN+ Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 Man if only the icon was right lol. What a run that was. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solution Man Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 Straight up beat down…wow. It’s the Icon 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deer Whisperer Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 Icon maps for fun please? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nj2va Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 3 minutes ago, Ji said: Icon works if you like becs 982 up the Bay lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 Man if only the icon was right lol. What a run that was. The blue seems suspect so close to the storm track but german engineering 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wetbulbs88 Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 1 hour ago, WxUSAF said: DT is riding the #snowtrain https://dtwxrisk.medium.com/tuesday-730pm-update-on-jan-15-16-east-coast-winter-storm-d46de7f907e8 The reasoning makes no sense. He argues for the ensemble quantity which would leave western regions high and dry, with suppression killing totals even for the bullseye, but then at the end calls for a massive snowstorm in western regions regardless of where the storm tracks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 After hearing about how bad the ICON is for days, I have a hunch the narrative changes going forward. 3 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 Gfs at 6. Not much change 1 13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nj2va Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 1 minute ago, Bob Chill said: After hearing about how bad the ICON is for days, I have a hunch the narrative changes going forward. Nope, still a terrible model regardless of the epic snowstorm it just spit out. I trust the NAM more than the ICON. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wetbulbs88 Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 1 hour ago, Bob Chill said: The thing that's bothering me the most about this storm is we just went 2 for 2. I mean sure, there's a strong case that the universe owes us some storms after some of the recent debacles. But still... 3 for 3? Idk man. We are who we think we were and stuff Gambler’s fallacy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StormchaserChuck! Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 Love the NAM at 84hrs 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CentralVaNATS Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 Everyone will be heading to the groceries for some sauerkraut after this run on the ICON Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk 5 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Reilly Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 8 minutes ago, TSSN+ said: Man if only the icon was right lol. What a run that was. It’s got the right idea! This track makes more sense with the development and upstream block Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthArlington101 Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 Icon maps for fun please?Here ya go. Go wild, but privately please. There are minors here! 3 2 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowLover22 Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 Not liking what I see from the gfs so far out east. Maybe something else can balance it out. Could be even further west. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 16 on the icon is like 41 on the nam 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CentralVaNATS Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 Here ya go. Go wild, but privately please. There are minors here!Is that in cm? Or just German weather porn???Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LP08 Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 Through 84, GFS has more press from NE and lower heights out front. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowLover22 Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 9 minutes ago, SnowLover22 said: Not liking what I see from the gfs so far out east. Maybe something else can balance it out. Could be even further west. I take back what I said. Ocean storm is phasing more effectively with the TPV allowing for lower heights over the NE. Not exactly sure why the phasing helps to allow for lower heights but that is the result. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Smith Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 1 hour ago, Bob Chill said: The thing that's bothering me the most about this storm is we just went 2 for 2. I mean sure, there's a strong case that the universe owes us some storms after some of the recent debacles. But still... 3 for 3? Idk man. We are who we think we were and stuff Get greedy. Retrograde the whole pattern and get the ocean storm too. There's no limit to optimism, pessimism has the lower bound of zero unless maybe one could visualize negative snow. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 Through 84, GFS has more press from NE and lower heights out front.Yep it wont be as west 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amped Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 For all the uncertainty in the ensembles, GFS OP looks like it;s headed for the same solution as 18z. Nothing major changed through 84hrs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowchaser Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 Southern forum right now 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 12, 2022 Author Share Posted January 12, 2022 Yeah, noticeably more press from the NE 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solution Man Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 1 minute ago, Ji said: 2 minutes ago, LP08 said: Through 84, GFS has more press from NE and lower heights out front. Yep it wont be as west Gonna like this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmichweather Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 I think it's going to be fugly 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravensrule Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 Just now, Solution Man said: Gonna like this Just now, cmichweather said: I think it's going to be fugly LOL 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LP08 Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 LP in TN, trough more positively titled. Can it wait to turn the corner? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowLover22 Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 2 minutes ago, Amped said: For all the uncertainty in the ensembles, GFS OP looks like it;s headed for the same solution as 18z. Nothing major changed through 84hrs. Significantly more confluence in the NE. what are you talking about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralph Wiggum Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 Better look. This is headed the right way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts