Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,603
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Jan 15-16 Winter Storm


Brick Tamland
 Share

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, buckeyefan1 said:

18z gfs 

1641924000-ZY1xXf2AC8Q.png

Hey Buckeye.    What site produces that version of the metograms?   I lost all of my old weather links.   Also it is strange that it is showing zero zn.    Pivotal was showing around a half and in of ice, around an inch and a half of sleet and 5 inches of snow for GSP for the 18z.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, UpStateCAD said:

Hey Buckeye.    What site produces that version of the metograms?   I lost all of my old weather links.   Also it is strange that it is showing zero zn.    Pivotal was showing around a half and in of ice, around an inch and a half of sleet and 5 inches of snow for GSP for the 18z.  

It's a weatherbell graphic, but here's a good free site for buffkit/meteograms https://meteor.geol.iastate.edu/~ckarsten/bufkit/image_loader.phtml  just put your airport code in the box to the right  :D 

Here is their buffkit output for gsp(top) and the snow meteogram(below)

220116/0600Z 108  06011KT  32.8F  RASN    0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.020    0:1|  0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.02   79|  0| 21
----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+---
220116/0700Z 109  05013KT  30.5F  SNPL    4:1| 0.3|| 0.04|| 0.00|| 0.065    4:1|  0.3|| 0.04|| 0.00|| 0.08   70| 30|  0
220116/0800Z 110  05015KT  29.4F  SNPL    7:1| 0.4|| 0.04|| 0.00|| 0.057    6:1|  0.7|| 0.08|| 0.00|| 0.14   64| 36|  0
220116/0900Z 111  06015KT  28.5F  SNOW   12:1| 1.1|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.093    8:1|  1.8|| 0.08|| 0.00|| 0.23  100|  0|  0
220116/1000Z 112  06015KT  27.6F  SNOW    7:1| 0.9|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.129    8:1|  2.7|| 0.08|| 0.00|| 0.36  100|  0|  0
220116/1100Z 113  05016KT  26.7F  SNOW    9:1| 1.2|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.133    8:1|  3.9|| 0.08|| 0.00|| 0.50  100|  0|  0
220116/1200Z 114  05017KT  25.8F  SNPL   14:1| 2.0|| 0.04|| 0.00|| 0.149    9:1|  5.9|| 0.12|| 0.00|| 0.65   87| 13|  0
----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+---
220116/1300Z 115  05017KT  25.1F  SNOW    9:1| 1.4|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.153    9:1|  7.3|| 0.12|| 0.00|| 0.80  100|  0|  0
220116/1400Z 116  04017KT  24.3F  SNOW    8:1| 1.4|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.182    9:1|  8.8|| 0.12|| 0.00|| 0.98  100|  0|  0
220116/1500Z 117  05018KT  23.6F  SNPL    7:1| 1.0|| 0.13|| 0.00|| 0.148    9:1|  9.7|| 0.25|| 0.00|| 1.13   55| 45|  0
220116/1600Z 118  05019KT  23.3F  ZRPL    0:1| 0.0|| 0.13|| 0.05|| 0.115    9:1|  9.7|| 0.39|| 0.05|| 1.24    0| 58| 42
220116/1700Z 119  05020KT  22.9F  ZRPL    0:1| 0.0|| 0.12|| 0.08|| 0.140    9:1|  9.7|| 0.51|| 0.13|| 1.39    0| 44| 56
220116/1800Z 120  05017KT  23.3F  ZRPL    0:1| 0.0|| 0.07|| 0.01|| 0.044    9:1|  9.7|| 0.58|| 0.14|| 1.43    0| 77| 23
----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+---
220116/2100Z 123  04013KT  24.0F  FZRA    0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.04|| 0.033    9:1|  9.7|| 0.58|| 0.18|| 1.46    0|  0|100
220117/0000Z 126  31004KT  24.7F  FZDZ    0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.04|| 0.042    9:1|  9.7|| 0.58|| 0.22|| 1.50    0|  0|100

snow accumulation plot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, buckeyefan1 said:

It's a weatherbell graphic, but here's a good free site for buffkit/meteograms https://meteor.geol.iastate.edu/~ckarsten/bufkit/image_loader.phtml  just put your airport code in the box to the right  :D 

Here is their buffkit output for gsp

 

220116/0600Z 108  06011KT  32.8F  RASN    0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.020    0:1|  0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.02   79|  0| 21
----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+---
220116/0700Z 109  05013KT  30.5F  SNPL    4:1| 0.3|| 0.04|| 0.00|| 0.065    4:1|  0.3|| 0.04|| 0.00|| 0.08   70| 30|  0
220116/0800Z 110  05015KT  29.4F  SNPL    7:1| 0.4|| 0.04|| 0.00|| 0.057    6:1|  0.7|| 0.08|| 0.00|| 0.14   64| 36|  0
220116/0900Z 111  06015KT  28.5F  SNOW   12:1| 1.1|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.093    8:1|  1.8|| 0.08|| 0.00|| 0.23  100|  0|  0
220116/1000Z 112  06015KT  27.6F  SNOW    7:1| 0.9|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.129    8:1|  2.7|| 0.08|| 0.00|| 0.36  100|  0|  0
220116/1100Z 113  05016KT  26.7F  SNOW    9:1| 1.2|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.133    8:1|  3.9|| 0.08|| 0.00|| 0.50  100|  0|  0
220116/1200Z 114  05017KT  25.8F  SNPL   14:1| 2.0|| 0.04|| 0.00|| 0.149    9:1|  5.9|| 0.12|| 0.00|| 0.65   87| 13|  0
----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+---
220116/1300Z 115  05017KT  25.1F  SNOW    9:1| 1.4|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.153    9:1|  7.3|| 0.12|| 0.00|| 0.80  100|  0|  0
220116/1400Z 116  04017KT  24.3F  SNOW    8:1| 1.4|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.182    9:1|  8.8|| 0.12|| 0.00|| 0.98  100|  0|  0
220116/1500Z 117  05018KT  23.6F  SNPL    7:1| 1.0|| 0.13|| 0.00|| 0.148    9:1|  9.7|| 0.25|| 0.00|| 1.13   55| 45|  0
220116/1600Z 118  05019KT  23.3F  ZRPL    0:1| 0.0|| 0.13|| 0.05|| 0.115    9:1|  9.7|| 0.39|| 0.05|| 1.24    0| 58| 42
220116/1700Z 119  05020KT  22.9F  ZRPL    0:1| 0.0|| 0.12|| 0.08|| 0.140    9:1|  9.7|| 0.51|| 0.13|| 1.39    0| 44| 56
220116/1800Z 120  05017KT  23.3F  ZRPL    0:1| 0.0|| 0.07|| 0.01|| 0.044    9:1|  9.7|| 0.58|| 0.14|| 1.43    0| 77| 23
----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+---
220116/2100Z 123  04013KT  24.0F  FZRA    0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.04|| 0.033    9:1|  9.7|| 0.58|| 0.18|| 1.46    0|  0|100
220117/0000Z 126  31004KT  24.7F  FZDZ    0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.04|| 0.042    9:1|  9.7|| 0.58|| 0.22|| 1.50    0|  0|100

Thanks.   I found that link.   I used to have the one you initially posted.   Can’t remember what it was.    BTW found part of the issue.   Big difference between downtown Greenville (KGMU) and GSP 18z unfortunately.   Much more ice downtown. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, UpStateCAD said:

Thanks.   I found that link.   I used to have the one you initially posted.   Can’t remember what it was.    BTW found part of the issue.   Big difference between downtown Greenville (KGMU) and GSP 18z unfortunately.   Much more ice downtown. 

I have so many  :lol:  I'll try to find the list we had posted for links and stuff. That I-85 struggle is real :( 

EDIT: Found it and bumped for everyone's viewing pleasure  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, StantonParkHoya said:

It’s old school, but a met on here back when it was the old site used to say the SLP will like to ride along the greatest temp contrast. Right now, that would favor right along the coastline. I think that’s the right answer.

I know it’s some very farmers almanac style stuff, but I like that sometimes.

No there's a little truth to that. SLPs want to ride ribbons of low level vorticity, which is the fancy pants way of saying "wind shifts". During CAD wedges, there's an area (typically off the coast) where the NE winds of the wedge butt directly against the SW or SE flowing winds off the coast. This is an area of natural "spin". When upper air energy is close by that spin gets stretched and spins faster (think the common ballerina analogy where it spins faster when the ballerina brings body closer together). 

So the GFS has this. I've tried to put in some arrows below showing wind speed and where this "ribbon" exists and where you'd expect the LLC to ride. This is basically why all the mets are flummoxed as to why the GFS wants to barrel this thing up 95.

image.thumb.png.95642cc0e92247c6e665bd977e2ee27f.png

 

  • Like 8
  • Thanks 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The CAD (if its strong/pronounced enough) would normally assist in dictating the slp track. Thats why its tough to make definitive statements at this range due to modelling error. If the wedge trends weaker (aka the cold push/HP isnt as strong) the SLP will naturally shift west towards the piedmont. All the players on the field naturally bounce off each other. Based on the current GFS' "projection" of the low level cold dome, the slp would likely bounce off the coastline in a Miller A/B hybrid scenario (not plow right through the piedmont like the bliz of 93). I think by Thursday we'll be zeroing in on the answer to this question.

 

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...