40/70 Benchmark Posted January 7, 2022 Author Share Posted January 7, 2022 On 1/7/2022 at 9:22 PM, HoarfrostHubb said: I wasn't here when it stopped snowing, but I'm going with 5.0" final A bit more than I had forecast Expand I had you near the cut off for 5-10"/3-6" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 7, 2022 Author Share Posted January 7, 2022 On 1/7/2022 at 9:07 PM, ORH_wxman said: Sunset to finish today. Perfect timing too. Sun only popped out in the past hour Expand Stayed cloudy here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted January 7, 2022 Share Posted January 7, 2022 On 1/7/2022 at 6:59 PM, wxsniss said: Per Box twitter: As of 1 PM, here are how our climate sites stand in terms of snowfall from the season's first major winter storm: #Boston - 11.2 inches #Worcester - 6.2 inches #Providence - 5.9 inches #Hartford - 5.4 inches Expand ASOS w.e. ORH 0.53” BOS 0.48” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIPPYVALLEY Posted January 7, 2022 Share Posted January 7, 2022 Lol, best snow growth of the day with this light batch moving in from Vermont. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tavwtby Posted January 7, 2022 Share Posted January 7, 2022 On 1/7/2022 at 9:17 PM, H2Otown_WX said: Your old place must have had more than 6". I had about 10" and I'm on the NW side of town. Expand nah, drove down there specifically to measure at the old place, just a tad over 6, although my BIL who lives up top of bunker hill, had close to 8.5, so maybe there was either a little elevation thing or some weird meso thing happening there... buddy in terryville also, about 7... seems like we'd have gotten more here if the growth was better, at 230 this morning it was absolutely ripping but putrid flakes, vis was below 1/4, woke back up at 5 and was less intense and similar flake size, hopefully start of a good run here, although I'll be heading to GA next Friday for a few weeks, so I'm going to miss bulk of winter. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2Otown_WX Posted January 7, 2022 Share Posted January 7, 2022 On 1/7/2022 at 9:44 PM, tavwtby said: nah, drove down there specifically to measure at the old place, just a tad over 6, although my BIL who lives up top of bunker hill, had close to 8.5, so maybe there was either a little elevation thing or some weird meso thing happening there... buddy in terryville also, about 7... seems like we'd have gotten more here if the growth was better, at 230 this morning it was absolutely ripping but putrid flakes, vis was below 1/4, woke back up at 5 and was less intense and similar flake size, hopefully start of a good run here, although I'll be heading to GA next Friday for a few weeks, so I'm going to miss bulk of winter. Expand Wow, that's weird...yeah I'm in BH. The depth was 8.5" at noon. I slept through the whole thing lol. Have fun down south. I may be moving to Little Rock soon so, no more snow. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tamarack Posted January 7, 2022 Share Posted January 7, 2022 On 1/7/2022 at 7:44 PM, dryslot said: 12” or so Expand Maybe less than that? (Though still much BN) With today's snow I'm at 15.9" and avg thru 1/7 is 28.7", so 12.8 BN. Your sig plus today should put you at 16.7". Edit: Saw your later response. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorEastermass128 Posted January 7, 2022 Share Posted January 7, 2022 Probably around 7” here. I think there’s a spotter in town. I’d go by that. I usually come in conservative since I just measure at the end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 7, 2022 Author Share Posted January 7, 2022 I'm at 9" on the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted January 7, 2022 Share Posted January 7, 2022 On 1/7/2022 at 8:26 PM, The 4 Seasons said: just saw a report from Blue Hills of 15.2, thats gotta be the max so far? Expand On 1/7/2022 at 9:18 PM, Sey-Mour Snow said: jc-ct? Expand yeah i guess we tied. NWS didn't like my report though, even though there were other reports in columbia of 14+ online. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eduggs Posted January 7, 2022 Share Posted January 7, 2022 On 1/7/2022 at 8:12 PM, The 4 Seasons said: Reports coming in so far from CoCoRahs represent a pretty uniform 18-20:1 in that band over CT. Would like to see all the climo sites and take a look back to see what models did well in that regard, a quick look at the GFS and it seems pretty reasonable from the 00Z run last night over CT. The past 6 runs i would say are consistent after 18Z Jan 5th run Expand Great post. The last few GFS runs probably ended up being too wet. People love to complain about the models being inconsistent, but I thought the GFS - and guidance in general - was very consistent with both the placement and magnitude of precipitation, especially within about 72 hours. Contrary to what most people will remember, this was a late developing storm that dumped most of its precipitation in the Gulf of Maine and the Maritimes. It did not end up significantly stronger or NW of where it was modeled several days ago. But it also clearly had a major impact because it didn't go OTS as a few model runs suggested several days ago. In the end, the high snow to liquid ratios resulted in a big overperforming snowstorm from NYC to BOS! A few people who called for big snow totals were right, but possibly not for the reasons that they thought. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted January 7, 2022 Share Posted January 7, 2022 On 1/7/2022 at 9:53 PM, eduggs said: Great post. The last few GFS runs probably ended up being too wet. People love to complain about the models being inconsistent, but I thought the GFS - and guidance in general - was very consistent with both the placement and magnitude of precipitation, especially within about 72 hours. Contrary to what most people will remember, this was a late developing storm that dumped most of its precipitation in the Gulf of Maine and the Maritimes. It did not end up significantly stronger or NW of where it was modeled several days ago. But it also clearly had a major impact because it didn't go OTS as a few model runs suggested several days ago. In the end, the high snow to liquid ratios resulted in a big overperforming snowstorm from NYC to BOS! A few people who called for big snow totals were right, but possibly not for the reasons that they thought. Expand are you saying the convection was not "not real"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 7, 2022 Author Share Posted January 7, 2022 On 1/7/2022 at 9:53 PM, eduggs said: Great post. The last few GFS runs probably ended up being too wet. People love to complain about the models being inconsistent, but I thought the GFS - and guidance in general - was very consistent with both the placement and magnitude of precipitation, especially within about 72 hours. Contrary to what most people will remember, this was a late developing storm that dumped most of its precipitation in the Gulf of Maine and the Maritimes. It did not end up significantly stronger or NW of where it was modeled several days ago. But it also clearly had a major impact because it didn't go OTS as a few model runs suggested several days ago. In the end, the high snow to liquid ratios resulted in a big overperforming snowstorm from NYC to BOS! A few people who called for big snow totals were right, but possibly not for the reasons that they thought. Expand Yea, I was just texting that to others...I had the totals pretty close on Tueaday, but I thought this would be hugging the coast. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eduggs Posted January 7, 2022 Share Posted January 7, 2022 On 1/7/2022 at 9:55 PM, JC-CT said: are you saying the convection was not "not real"? Expand Definitely not not. I also think anybody mentioning convection and SLP placement should be insta-weenie tagged. That's high on the list of wishcasting obsessions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted January 7, 2022 Share Posted January 7, 2022 On 1/7/2022 at 9:59 PM, eduggs said: Definitely not not. I also think anybody mentioning convection and SLP placement should be insta-weenie tagged. That's high on the list of wishcasting obsessions. Expand Well it's probably a good thing you're not a mod then, since I don't think many here would agree with you weenie-tagging mets like Will and Tip. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted January 7, 2022 Share Posted January 7, 2022 Went sledding at that hill down the street from me near the water. Was a wetter snow there with some ice on the trees meaning it was melting a bit before it cooled off. Pretty cool differences. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIPPYVALLEY Posted January 7, 2022 Share Posted January 7, 2022 On 1/7/2022 at 9:50 PM, 40/70 Benchmark said: I'm at 9" on the season. Expand 5.75” on the season but this current burst may get me up to 6” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 7, 2022 Author Share Posted January 7, 2022 They only had 1-3" out in the Berkshires? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The 4 Seasons Posted January 7, 2022 Share Posted January 7, 2022 On 1/7/2022 at 9:50 PM, JC-CT said: yeah i guess we tied. NWS didn't like my report though, even though there were other reports in columbia of 14+ online. Expand dont worry NWS didnt like my report either even though ive been chatting with them privately all morning and they reporting everything up to 10.6 then stopped. I guess they didn't include @Sey-Mour Snowreport either for some reason? But they included the 12" report in wtby which is BS. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted January 7, 2022 Share Posted January 7, 2022 On 1/7/2022 at 10:04 PM, 40/70 Benchmark said: They only had 1-3" out in the Berkshires? Expand Looks that way based on BOX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 7, 2022 Author Share Posted January 7, 2022 On 1/7/2022 at 10:09 PM, HoarfrostHubb said: Looks that way based on BOX Expand Dendrite had like 4"...strange Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tavwtby Posted January 7, 2022 Share Posted January 7, 2022 On 1/7/2022 at 9:46 PM, H2Otown_WX said: Wow, that's weird...yeah I'm in BH. The depth was 8.5" at noon. I slept through the whole thing lol. Have fun down south. I may be moving to Little Rock soon so, no more snow. Expand yeah I love winter, and all this, but I'm the only one, and so much more opportunity there, severe season should be a blast though, good luck! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJOatleast7 Posted January 7, 2022 Share Posted January 7, 2022 On 1/7/2022 at 6:59 PM, wxsniss said: Per Box twitter: As of 1 PM, here are how our climate sites stand in terms of snowfall from the season's first major winter storm: #Boston - 11.2 inches #Worcester - 6.2 inches #Providence - 5.9 inches #Hartford - 5.4 inches Expand There goes the futility title for this year. (1936-37 BOS) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lava Rock Posted January 7, 2022 Share Posted January 7, 2022 4". Pedestrian. Congrats SNESent from my SM-G981U1 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted January 7, 2022 Share Posted January 7, 2022 On 1/7/2022 at 10:10 PM, 40/70 Benchmark said: Dendrite had like 4"...strange Expand Did you look at the BOX map? https://www.weather.gov/source/crh/snowmap.html?zoom=4&lat=31.91&lon=-92.67&hr=24 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tavwtby Posted January 7, 2022 Share Posted January 7, 2022 On 1/7/2022 at 10:06 PM, The 4 Seasons said: dont worry NWS didnt like my report either even though ive been chatting with them privately all morning and they reporting everything up to 10.6 then stopped. I guess they didn't include @Sey-Mour Snowreport either for some reason? But they included the 12" report in wtby which is BS. Expand HA! some serious horizontal measurements in wtby, no way anyone got double digits there, I didn't see my report to albany either but like I said, they changed the way they are displaying the reports, making it hard to read, so maybe I missed it, my first report this year, and reporting is done the same via email. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted January 7, 2022 Share Posted January 7, 2022 11.7” Logan. Making measuring great again. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhineasC Posted January 7, 2022 Share Posted January 7, 2022 Upslope is here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The 4 Seasons Posted January 7, 2022 Share Posted January 7, 2022 On 1/7/2022 at 10:13 PM, tavwtby said: HA! some serious horizontal measurements in wtby, no way anyone got double digits there, I didn't see my report to albany either but like I said, they changed the way they are displaying the reports, making it hard to read, so maybe I missed it, my first report this year, and reporting is done the same via email. Expand try this Text Products for PNS Issued by ALY (weather.gov) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorEastermass128 Posted January 7, 2022 Share Posted January 7, 2022 On 1/7/2022 at 10:15 PM, CoastalWx said: 11.7” Logan. Making measuring great again. Expand And just like that, a quarter of our seasonal snowfall is in the books. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now