Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,863
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Malmax64
    Newest Member
    Malmax64
    Joined

Jan 6/7 "Event" and obs


stormtracker
 Share

Recommended Posts

  On 1/6/2022 at 3:52 PM, osfan24 said:

Exactly. And I think PSU made the point that, when it comes to globals, the Euro is much better picking out the banding features than the GFS. I pray the GFS is right, but I prayed it was right just before the last storm and I was sadly mistaken.

Expand  

Same here. GFS showed a better northern edge that turned out to be pure fantasy.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/6/2022 at 3:52 PM, osfan24 said:

Exactly. And I think PSU made the point that, when it comes to globals, the Euro is much better picking out the banding features than the GFS. I pray the GFS is right, but I prayed it was right just before the last storm and I was sadly mistaken.

Expand  

GFS had me and your old hood nailed perfectly this week. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/6/2022 at 3:52 PM, osfan24 said:

Exactly. And I think PSU made the point that, when it comes to globals, the Euro is much better picking out the banding features than the GFS. I pray the GFS is right, but I prayed it was right just before the last storm and I was sadly mistaken.

Expand  

The gfs actually did quite well handling that last storm… it was just a bit off on where that sharp cutoff would be. It had it further NW. otherwise, it handled the evolution of the system pretty well. Missed on the totals near I-70 and Richmond though  

With that being said, this setup is much different. Meso models are much more important for this type of setup when we’re talking about banding, transfer of energy to the coast, etc. GFS does well when it comes to handling one main area of low pressure tracking to our south. Not so much when we’re talking about two distinct areas of precip / lift and the interaction between them. The GFS tends to oversimplify things and see things much more uniformly, missing the nuances of miller b type storms. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/6/2022 at 3:58 PM, SomeguyfromTakomaPark said:

Thomas is great.  The purple fiddle is a cool spot!

Expand  
  On 1/6/2022 at 4:02 PM, gunny23 said:

We want to head out to Canaan tonight but I don't think we could get on the road before 6:30 - might make for a rough drive.

Expand  
  On 1/6/2022 at 4:02 PM, nj2va said:

Spine of the Apps from Garrett down to Snowshoe will be a great spot, but especially Davis and Snowshoe.

Expand  

I'm also going to check out Timberline... never skied there before but with their improvements it should be a fun experience. Although not everything is open, I think conditions should be great after tonight.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/6/2022 at 3:58 PM, RVASnowLover said:

Just a FYI, the GFS also had Richmond getting 8-12” Monday’s storm and we didn’t even get close to that. Just throwing the caution warning out there for those hugging the GFS. Maybe it’s right for you guys though 

Expand  

If you take the 10:1 maps as gospel, sure it might've looked like that, but Richmond was never getting 8-12" on any model if you looked at the details. You were in the mix zone for hours. That all gets counted as snow.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/6/2022 at 2:44 PM, WxUSAF said:

Some/many/most of us have realized that there’s going to be a middle finger screw zone somewhere with this storm as the energy transfers to the coast and the precip to the west weakens before the coastal enhancement sets up. And we’ve been saying it could be through our region. Seems like there are two places the models are placing it so far this morning:

1. DC northeastward towards Lancaster Co PA. 
2. Philly northeastward through the NYC area.

Hrrr and Euro are in camp 1. 3k NAM and FV3 are in camp 2.  Haven’t looked close enough to try and tease out what the precise differences are driving that.

Expand  

RGEM in camp 2

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/6/2022 at 4:14 PM, TSG said:

If you take the 10:1 maps as gospel, sure it might've looked like that, but Richmond was never getting 8-12" on any model if you looked at the details. You were in the mix zone for hours. That all gets counted as snow.

Expand  

And unless something has changed, the GFS still counts sleet as massive snow on the 10:1 right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/6/2022 at 3:49 PM, stormtracker said:

The thing is..the GFS is global.  I'd be kinda cautious vs the mesos

Expand  

Globals are too broad brush for narrowly defined sensible wx in the short range. Euro has the resolution but it's still a global. OTOH- mesos try to be "too accurate" with exact placement of subtle variations of qpf/bands etc. I know you know this but just reminding everyone that all decent models are useful in the short range but no one model is deadly. Just blend and apply climo. Rarely fails. 

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...