Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,611
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

OBS-NOWCAST for the first moderate to high impact snowstorm of the 21-22 season, along and south of I95 3AM-7PM Monday January 3, 2022


wdrag
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 234
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

2 minutes ago, WestBabylonWeather said:

No expert. But judging by radar back end should graze LI. Not sure how long it will last 

 

Peaks of sun in Barnegat NJ, back end is marching to the coast FAST.  Just about over.  Quick 4 inch storm, and watching temps slide with the DP 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A meaty ehco south of the island by the N/S border. Let's see how far north she can get. Took the drone up and i can see the band offshore. Cant post photos here for some reason. 

Saw some flurries while outside, NW Suffolk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jm1220 said:

Looks like a burst enough to maybe cover the ground coming for areas Rt 112 and east. Hamptons/Montauk might walk away with 1-3” after all. 

South shore around islip should be getting light snow now, lets see if it can creep north of the LIE...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NW edge obviously dried out and SREF in particular was too far nw while the multiple model ensemble axis S+ did well (GEFS/EPS/SREF)...many reports 8-12" just south of DCA to near or just south of ACY.  

GFS obviously has a problem drying out snow, despite its decent soundings. Even the drier NAM was too robust on the NW side.  Am thinking similar drying out problem with the EC.  

Which leaves the SPC HREF best of the short range groups with its 00z/2, 12z/2 and 00z/3 cycles attached. 

It was a grazer as initially threaded by Forky.

As a planner-preparer for minimizing impacts, even though essentially nada occurred NYC, I would prepare similarly again.  The downside is far larger problem than the successful zero accumulation forecast.  

It's a matter of all of us realizing that the gradient edges of ensembled, or operational cycles can be wrong and keeping that in mind as we anticipate.

I'm sure we're in a far better place with the modeling than 10 or 20 years ago, let alone 50 years ago. 

Screen Shot 2022-01-03 at 1.23.25 PM.png

Screen Shot 2022-01-03 at 1.22.30 PM.png

Screen Shot 2022-01-03 at 1.21.53 PM.png

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, wdrag said:

NW edge obviously dried out and SREF in particular was too far nw while the multiple model ensemble axis S+ did well (GEFS/EPS/SREF)...many reports 8-12" just south of DCA to near or just south of ACY.  

GFS obviously has a problem drying out snow, despite its decent soundings. Even the drier NAM was too robust on the NW side.  Am thinking similar drying out problem with the EC.  

Which leaves the SPC HREF best of the short range groups with its 00z/2, 12z/2 and 00z/3 cycles attached. 

It was a grazer as initially threaded by Forky.

As a planner-preparer for minimizing impacts, even though essentially nada occurred NYC, I would prepare similarly again.  The downside is far larger problem than the successful zero accumulation forecast.  

It's a matter of all of us realizing that the gradient edges of ensembled, or operational cycles can be wrong and keeping that in mind as we anticipate.

I'm sure we're in a far better place with the modeling than 10 or 20 years ago, let alone 50 years ago. 

Screen Shot 2022-01-03 at 1.23.25 PM.png

Screen Shot 2022-01-03 at 1.22.30 PM.png

Screen Shot 2022-01-03 at 1.21.53 PM.png

Seems like the dry air really won out from Philly on north. It’s why it’s better to look at soundings which showed the dry layer than the overaggressive snow maps in most cases. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jm1220 said:

Seems like the dry air really won out from Philly on north. It’s why it’s better to look at soundings which showed the dry layer than the overaggressive snow maps in most cases. 

Yea. Even my call for 1/2" was too much lol. I should have stuck to my guns and called nothing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, wdrag said:

9.5" in ACY as of 1P...makes it top 14 snowiest January on record and I think Bluewave indicated we might get top 10 snowiest day.  Right now #16 snowiest 24 hour snowfall in a climate calendar day.  

All this means (for me): it was a big one for that area. 

Still some mod to heavy banding in that area. Wonder if they have a shot at 12”? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, what do the EPS and GEFS ensembles look like 12 hours into a forecast. The 12z/3 cycle attached ending 00z this evening.  This is only 1 vendor.  

So the EPS looks more throughly available... but notice how much light snow it put into the dry air nw of I95.  Ditto the less spatially complete GEFS, but there as well,   too much snow into the dry air and these are only 12 hours into the forecast. So there were still a variety of solutions with the 12z init.  

This tries to demonstrate some limitations in the ensemble utility...  the core axis should usually should be reasonable in big systems, presuming it's consistent, not wind shield wiper  = back and forth.

Screen Shot 2022-01-03 at 2.11.15 PM.png

Screen Shot 2022-01-03 at 2.13.40 PM.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Flurries and 30F, Wading River.   Upton's most recent discussion still somewhat bullish for Suffolk Cty

Likewise, cloud bases are lower towards Central and
Eastern Long Island and low clouds are more expansive there.
Snow has begun to develop but is currently light. Most intense
snow expected with potential 1/2 inch to 1 inch per hour rates
between 3 and 6 PM for southern and eastern portions of Suffolk
County. Winter weather advisory remains in effect until 7PM for
these areas. Still going with a snow forecast of 1 to 3 inches
with localized amounts up to 4 inches possible. Elsewhere, less
than an inch of snow expected with too much dry air in the low
levels to allow for steady snow. For NW Suffolk, 1 to 2 inches
of snow expected.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...