Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,610
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

January 3 CAPE Storm


WxUSAF
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, peribonca said:

So what are people thinking in terms of wasted precipitation? Do we have white rain for a few hours 1am-3am then start sticking?

Nowcast for that stuff. Need the wall of yellows to roll right overhead with no light green lulls or worse... holes...

If the waa is juicy, we avoid relying on a 6 hour windowor less of "rates" to cover everything. The best accum snow will obviously be during the CCB portion. If your ground is still mostly brown by that time, big snows become hard to impossible. If there's 2-4" of gloppy potatoes on the ground when the CCB sets up... oh boy.... hehe

The tricky part is nobody can honestly say they know how the front side breaks and until that's figured out, the cold side amounts are nothing more than wild guesses 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1 minute ago, WxMan1 said:

I think the cooling due to conduction, i.e. with cold rain at the onset, does a great deal pretty quickly. We often see road surface temps fall into the 30s pretty quickly. But you're absolutely correct -- that first layer would be slush, and overall, the depth of snow on the roads in this setup would be less than that over non-paved surfaces. Would be a mess to drive on. 

Like you all have said, it's a "rates" storm. We absolutely need that or it's essentially a non-event. Much like November 11th 1987. When it happens, it's a think of beauty. A low probability event to be sure, but we've got the setup going for us, as well as a consensus among most models now within 24 hrs of the event. 

Mind blown, I've never thought of conduction which is pretty embarrassing as an engineer.  A cold rain right at 33F or somewhere close should take all the heat out of the soil.   Then it's just losses due to snow hitting wet ground, not necessarily warm ground though. 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stormtracker said:

Lol dc metro under weather advisory. Charles county s and e upgraded to warning. Ok

DC itself could end up with a wide range of outcomes based on tiny distances. You're in the best general area of DC so that's good. Foggy bottom or navy yard weenies may not be stoked bros after the storm is done. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, snowmagnet said:

Just got a WAA for Fairfax for 2-4”. It seems to be too conservative based on the latest information.  Is that because they depend on the NAM?

Makes more sense for them to be conservative here and upgrade this evening if the trend holds/continues rather than go all in now and have it bust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Bob Chill said:

DC itself could end up with a wide range of outcomes based on tiny distances. You're in the best general area of DC so that's good. Foggy bottom or navy yard weenies may not be stoked bros after the storm is done. 

I think its the usual LWX SOP...upgrade as you go along

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Wentzadelphia said:

Stealing this from my region, thanks Tony, but this is the model that will be replacing the NAM soon. Let's see how it does...

 

       Sort of.     Yes, the NAM (and RAP/HRRR and Hi-Res Windows) will be subsumed by a hi-res, hourly FV3 ensemble (called the RRFS), but the configuration of that hi-res FV3 is not what the configuration of the RRFS members will be (different physics, different initialization....).      Think of this run that you showed as sort of a hi-res GFS for now.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, high risk said:

       Sort of.     Yes, the NAM (and RAP/HRRR and Hi-Res Windows) will be subsumed by a hi-res, hourly FV3 ensemble (called the RRFS), but the configuration of that hi-res FV3 is not what the configuration of the RRFS members will be (different physics, different initialization....).      Think of this run that you showed as sort of a hi-res GFS for now.

What's the plan for the 3k NAM?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...