Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,618
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    RyRyB
    Newest Member
    RyRyB
    Joined

January 3 CAPE Storm


WxUSAF
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, mappy said:

lol the nam. Stop looking at it 

The one above is the ICON, but yeah no NAM watching. Problem with the icon even though it doesn’t carry much weight is that it has a bit of that northern stream interaction/interference we were getting rid of hence the nice improvements last night/overnight. Euro at 6z might have the best h5 look overall, and you saw what the outcome was there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

7 minutes ago, DDweatherman said:

I have to agree with you about letting the chips fall. Coming from someone who moved from Baltimore to a more climo favored area like Westminster, and lived there for three years, I can honestly say I was never able to enjoy the fruits of my labor. Last winter it benefited me slightly to live there, But it was never anything drastic. There was the storm last year where Westminster got about 7 inches and Thurmont/Carroll Valley got 16 to 18. The cities had 3-4, but it was never the coastal runner that brought 4-6&mix in Baltimore and 12-15 in the NW burbs. 

Well here I am now living in Carroll Valley as of October, waiting to see if I can maximize another decent climo location.

 

I'm not going to derail this thread anymore after this. 

 I'm not the same Bob Chill I was for most of the past 15 years. The ROI on snow chasing around here is embarrassingly small. I've wasted enough time with it already. That chapter is closed. I wrote this winter off (as a good setup in general) back in Sept and never changed my mind. It still hasn't changed but that doesn't mean we don't back our way into acceptable events/totals. That said, I'm only going to be here for legit long track coastals and super short range and/or obs threads. I don't give a single F what any op shows d5+ unless it's a big dog. I'm not tracking any middle of the road shortwave beyond 48-72 hours and even then it's a very casual approach. My time is valuable and chasing ghosts is a complete and total waste of it

  • Like 19
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DDweatherman said:

The one above is the ICON, but yeah no NAM watching. Problem with the icon even though it doesn’t carry much weight is that it has a bit of that northern stream interaction/interference we were getting rid of hence the nice improvements last night/overnight. Euro at 6z might have the best h5 look overall, and you saw what the outcome was there. 

At this point ya just let whatever happens happens and not stress over the models wavering. Take what you get, be happy with it and enjoy. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

It can happen. I only got 2.5” from the Jan 2019 storm. There was a storm in Jan 1987 that gave DC a foot and fringed up here. Jan 2010 also was like that. The orographic banding and super high ratios you described is why there will typically be that “deathband” up here. The added terrain lift along with colder temps typically causes better snow growth conditions here. I often have 20-1 ratios. But those factors won’t happen if we’re in the subsidence zone and that can happen if the storm track is far enough south. Right now the track is iffy if there will be enough mid level moisture transport into this area. One more tick north like last night and we probably would see the typical orographic effects up here but there needs to be good enough moisture to take advantage of that.   

It def can happen but your post illustrates my point perfectly. Once every 10-15 years it happens. And since it did (in my yard) in Jan 2019, we can discuss the next time as we approach 2030. 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Bob Chill said:

I'm not going to derail this thread anymore after this. 

 I'm not the same Bob Chill I was for most of the past 15 years. The ROI on snow chasing around here is embarrassingly small. I've wasted enough time with it already. That chapter is closed. I wrote this winter off (as a good setup in general) back in Sept and never changed my mind. It still hasn't changed but that doesn't mean we don't back our way into acceptable events/totals. That said, I'm only going to be here for legit long track coastals and super short range and/or obs threads. I don't give a single F what any op shows d5+ unless it's a big dog. I'm not tracking any middle of the road shortwave beyond 48-72 hours and even then it's a very casual approach. My time is valuable and chasing ghosts is a complete and total waste of it

i feel similarly about my time spent tracking the wizards/skins lol.  the nba is truly still a superstar league and the wft/skins/hogs/red wolves/whatever they're gonna be need to figure out who's going to be their starting qb.  re weather...the analysis part is fun...the lack of control is not.  learning can kinda cancel that out and make you more wise about picking which storms to invest time in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CAPE said:

Looks reasonable to me considering the antecedent conditions and the progressive nature of the pattern. You really buy those pretty WB clown maps?

No, I was more looking at how much snow he has so far south. I'd be super worried about rain and mixing down that way.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CAPE said:

Looks reasonable to me considering the antecedent conditions and the progressive nature of the pattern. You really buy those pretty WB clown maps?

I agree, I’m not as optimistic about the 7-10” region but the rest looks exactly like mine. Hoping to lock in that look at 18Z

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, osfan24 said:

No, I was more looking at how much snow he has so far south. I'd be super worried about rain and mixing down that way.

Have not seen much concern for that yet, other than at the beginning. Once the column cools, given the somewhat suppressed/offshore track of the low, it should remain all snow. Best fgen still progged there, so even with more marginal surface temps for at least part of the event, a longer duration of moderate/heavy snow in those areas should get it done. I might have placed the heaviest snow area slightly further north.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...