Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Upstate/Eastern New York-Pattern Change Vs Tughill Curse?


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, TugHillMatt said:

So you're going with closer to a Ukie look with us in between the best of both systems?

image.thumb.png.b9dc9c50979593f5402e3f058054db64.png

I just think models will start catching up on that cold press. That’s a big man high pushing on that front. Unless piece of the tpv really phases in I’m not buying the stationary front with waves riding up it. I think it’s the frontal precip then thermal bndry goes south then final wave rides that bndry Not sure how far south that second wave goes. But would not shock me if it goes to i95 or cuse to bgm hit. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, tombo82685 said:

I just think models will start catching up on that cold press. That’s a big man high pushing on that front. Unless piece of the tpv really phases in I’m not buying the stationary front with waves riding up it. I think it’s the frontal precip then front comes through for final wave. Not sure how far south that second wave goes. But would not shock me if it goes to i95 or cuse to bgm hit. 

Its anyones guess. Remember the 3 day torch showing up on all ENS 3-4 days ago? It showed 40s for 3 straight days here and a max high of 58 on Weds lol

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, rochesterdave said:

Tom, what maps do you look at for the polar vortex? The 500 vorticity? And do you look at the inner core or the outer ring(if that makes sense?)

Any h5 map shows it. This is h5 anom map. Can see the southern s/w then tpv up in central Canada. Can see the piece of energy rotating around tpv that is what gfs phases in and what would promote a stronger cutter and se ridge.  Euro keeps pieces disconnected 

16338664-53FE-4BE4-BD97-3124EDF49E4C.jpeg

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, tombo82685 said:

Yea I remember rochesterdave posting all those 11 day gfs maps and I said ens look way different 

The ENS looked nearly as warm though. NWS wouldn't forecast a high above 40 for 3 straight days unless the models/ENS showed it around here. The ENS can change pretty drastically too. The GEFS for the storm we got hit with were all showing max snowfall far SE, they were absolutely terrible for that storm and the OP won out. They were hundreds of miles off within a few days time.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tea kettle
type band over mid lake will head toward eastern shore late
Sunday afternoon into Sunday evening. The ultimate landing spot
for this band on eastern shore of Lake Ontario will be highly
dictated by weak wind field/mesoscale processes that are hard to
determine yet. But, if that band comes onshore, potential is
there for several inches of fluffy snow due to strong low-level
convergence helped out by overall weak convergence as the
clipper moves through and also a favorable profile with lake
EQLs up to 8kft and good portion of the lake convective layer in
the DGZ. SLRs could only be increased due to the light winds.
Using output from the Canadian-regional and NAM increased snow
amounts toward Jefferson and Oswego county border, but didn`t
extend this too far inland with the light winds. Some hint that
passage of trough could shove this band back more over southeast
shore of Lake Ontario late Sunday night or it may just dissolve
as winds become variable and eventually push it back across the
open waters of the lake into Monday morning. Meantime, off Lake
Erie with sw flow, temps plenty cold enough at top of inversion
and still enough open water, there could be a few snow showers
impacting Buffalo Metro at times Sun night into Monday morning,
though nothing really shows near as much as the activity east of
Lake Ontario. Away from the lake effect Sun and Sun night it
will be not as cold with highs on Sun in the 20s and lows in the
single digits Sun night.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, BuffaloWeather said:

The ENS looked nearly as warm though. NWS wouldn't forecast a high above 40 for 3 straight days unless the models/ENS showed it around here. The ENS can change pretty drastically too. The GEFS for the storm we got hit with were all showing max snowfall far SE, they were absolutely terrible for that storm and the OP won out. They were hundreds of miles off within a few days time.

That’s the gefs day 12 for this coming Thursday that’s barely abv normal

https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/?model=gfs-ens&region=us&pkg=T2ma&runtime=2022012212&fh=318

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Feel pretty confident Boston will have its biggest ever snowstorm today. Pretty incredible. Logan was over 17" at 2 pm. Likely over 19" by now.

https://www.boston.com/weather/local-news/2022/01/28/top-10-boston-area-snowstorms-on-record/

  1. Feb. 18, 2003: 27.6 inches
  2. Feb. 7, 1978: 27.1 inches
  3. April 1, 1997: 25.4 inches
  4. Feb. 9, 2013: 24.9 inches
  5. Jan. 27, 2015: 24.4 inches
  6. Feb. 17, 2003: 23.6 inches
  7. Jan. 23, 2005: 22.5 inches
  8. Jan. 28, 2015: 22.3 inches
  9. Feb. 9, 2015: 22.2 inches
  10. Jan. 21, 1978: 21.4 inches

WUNIDS_map?num=12&type=N0Q&mapx=400&mapy

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BuffaloWeather said:

Feel pretty confident Boston will have its biggest ever snowstorm today. Pretty incredible. Logan was over 17" at 2 pm. Likely over 19" by now.

https://www.boston.com/weather/local-news/2022/01/28/top-10-boston-area-snowstorms-on-record/

  1. Feb. 18, 2003: 27.6 inches
  2. Feb. 7, 1978: 27.1 inches
  3. April 1, 1997: 25.4 inches
  4. Feb. 9, 2013: 24.9 inches
  5. Jan. 27, 2015: 24.4 inches
  6. Feb. 17, 2003: 23.6 inches
  7. Jan. 23, 2005: 22.5 inches
  8. Jan. 28, 2015: 22.3 inches
  9. Feb. 9, 2015: 22.2 inches
  10. Jan. 21, 1978: 21.4 inches

WUNIDS_map?num=12&type=N0Q&mapx=400&mapy

That certainly is a derelict band.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, BuffaloWeather said:

Feel pretty confident Boston will have its biggest ever snowstorm today. Pretty incredible. Logan was over 17" at 2 pm. Likely over 19" by now.

https://www.boston.com/weather/local-news/2022/01/28/top-10-boston-area-snowstorms-on-record/

  1. Feb. 18, 2003: 27.6 inches
  2. Feb. 7, 1978: 27.1 inches
  3. April 1, 1997: 25.4 inches
  4. Feb. 9, 2013: 24.9 inches
  5. Jan. 27, 2015: 24.4 inches
  6. Feb. 17, 2003: 23.6 inches
  7. Jan. 23, 2005: 22.5 inches
  8. Jan. 28, 2015: 22.3 inches
  9. Feb. 9, 2015: 22.2 inches
  10. Jan. 21, 1978: 21.4 inches

WUNIDS_map?num=12&type=N0Q&mapx=400&mapy

Surprised no march in top 10

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...