tavwtby Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 looks a little more progressive, or am I reading that wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
78Blizzard Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 Going east. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 1 minute ago, moneypitmike said: It may be getting it's act together.....not to be denied. Its not, It will. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 1 minute ago, weathafella said: Shit streak may be lifting out in time? Mommy scooter with a handful of wet wipes saves ema? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George001 Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 I don’t think it’s weaker, just a little slower to develop. Looks like the shortwave holds back a bit more than last run, and the storm starts bombing out later. This gives it the appearance of being weaker, but it holding back more wouldn’t it be a good thing because of better wave spacing? I think it’s going to recover and end up farther west and stronger than last run. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
met_fan Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 Source? I've seen 45% in recent months, which means a significant number of people are still being impacted by a storm like this.The work from home percentage in nowhere near as high as most people thinkhttps://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2021/09/work-from-home-numbers/620107/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STILL N OF PIKE Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 Shows about .1 Qpf but queens will queen 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoth Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 Well, shut it down, people. The NAM has spoken. Said no one ever. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 1 minute ago, George001 said: I don’t think it’s weaker, just a little slower to develop. Looks like the shortwave holds back a bit more than last run, and the storm starts bombing out later. This gives it the appearance of being weaker, but it holding back more wouldn’t it be a good thing because of better wave spacing? I think it’s going to recover and end up farther west and stronger than last run. NO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sn0waddict Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 Ya it ain’t great. But it’s the NAM let’s not freak out quite yet… Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tavwtby Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 after 0z will be more confident in anything, always wanted to wait until 48 out before lock, too much waver, as it's sampled more, if we still have this look tomorrow morning, I think we're good, better east, but still all SNE gets plowable imo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 2 minutes ago, George001 said: I don’t think it’s weaker, just a little slower to develop. Looks like the shortwave holds back a bit more than last run, and the storm starts bombing out later. This gives it the appearance of being weaker, but it holding back more wouldn’t it be a good thing because of better wave spacing? I think it’s going to recover and end up farther west and stronger than last run. bruh, best just to not look Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 Its 12mb weaker at the surface, See ya. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 Disaster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moneypitmike Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 Well that sucked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 Little nuances in the flow can make big impacts…but I never trust the NAM with synoptics this far out. Onto the GFS. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 Just now, dryslot said: Its 12mb weaker at the surface, See ya. it's trying to get it's sht together...for the orcas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TauntonBlizzard2013 Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 No sugar coating that, it looks like hell. Bad start to 00z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IowaStorm05 Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 I mean that looks really bad. And this was what some people said was an important reveal? It gives me about an inch. A light inch. It doesn’t just look weaker. It looks dead. Trustworthy or not I don’t like that. And it’s not the first time today something hinted at super weak. I saw those ensembles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
78Blizzard Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 The problem looked to be that convection off NC forming another low further out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George001 Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 2 minutes ago, dryslot said: Its 12mb weaker at the surface, See ya. That ****ing sucks. Hate to see it, I think it had initialization issues though. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 At least Pasta just scored. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STILL N OF PIKE Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 Wide right like Ray Finkle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TauntonBlizzard2013 Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 Just now, 78Blizzard said: The problem looked to be that convection off NC forming another low further out. That’s a pesky little feature showing up on a lot of runs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 Just now, CoastalWx said: At least Pasta just scored. Better look then the Nam too. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STILL N OF PIKE Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 2 minutes ago, dendrite said: Little nuances in the flow can make big impacts…but I never trust the NAM with synoptics this far out. Onto the GFS. Do we trust the gf’s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TauntonBlizzard2013 Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 Yeah….. I’m pretty sure those worried about mixing can drop that thought like a bad habit right now. Just hope you see some precip. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 It’ll show a wound up missile at 6z so ema weenies go smoke a J and relax. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George001 Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 6 minutes ago, George001 said: I don’t think it’s weaker, just a little slower to develop. Looks like the shortwave holds back a bit more than last run, and the storm starts bombing out later. This gives it the appearance of being weaker, but it holding back more wouldn’t it be a good thing because of better wave spacing? I think it’s going to recover and end up farther west and stronger than last run. ….yeah it’s weaker, but the run had major initialization issues and is struggling with the pattern. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahk_webstah Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 Just now, TauntonBlizzard2013 said: Yeah….. I’m pretty sure those worried about mixing can drop that thought like a bad habit right now. Just hope you see some precip. based on this run of the NAM? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now