Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Chargers10
    Newest Member
    Chargers10
    Joined

Tracking Jan 7 coastal storm. Lingering compression/flow velocity has not lent to consensus, but it seems at 30 hours out.. finally?


Typhoon Tip
 Share

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, powderfreak said:

I will say the HRRR extended runs at 00/06/12/18z have been pretty good this season IMO.  I've watched it more than normal for whatever reason.  The hourly differences can be crap, but the earlier runs showing a good hit from you to BOS were in that extended range that has seemed ok this winter at least up here.  Who knows.  It's not terrible when taken in the aggregate, just the hour to hour runs diminish it's value.  It'd be like running the 3km NAM hourly, of course there's going to be a lot of variety. 

Learn to love it, because it’s going FV3 core and running to 60 hours and you’re going to lose the NAM and HRRR.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said:

 

I just got called to cover a 7 to 4 shift tomorrow.  Gladly will drive in heavy snow tomorrow. Love driving while everyone else is home.

You have 4 wheel or all wheel drive? I used to love driving in the snow when I had my Toyota Tacoma with the snow tires, never got stuck.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DotRat_Wx said:

Well, in 1930, people in Boston were thirsty, so they gathered all the local antivax smallpoxers in the towns of Petersham, New Salem, Hardwick, Ware, Belchertown, Shutesbury, Pelham. Then they filled all the towns up with water and drown them and it became the quabbin reservoir. Now Boston drinks the blood of the dead. 

and i enjoy every drop

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

It’s definitely all about the convection. Those uglier RAP runs and HRRR runs are chasing. We’ll know how real it is later this evening. 

IMHO, if guidance is still reversing trends this late in the game, its simply going to be a nowcast aspect that models can not resolve. This doesn't necessarily mean it works out favorably either...its not a weenieism to ignore unfavorable trends, but rather an acknowledgement that if it's not resolved at 10 hours lead, then maybe it won't be.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Hoth said:

There was a big storm a few years back where the models were latching onto nodes of convection and a multi-low structure. Similar to today, there was a lot of consternation in here that it was going to tug the system out to sea or cut off the conveyors. In reality, the western low wound up predominating, the convection was a non-factor and everyone got a big hit. I want to say it was the Jan '18 blizzard, but I can't say for sure. Anyone remember? Will?

I know what you're referring to... now this is bothering me too lol... I remember dubbing it "mogwai" because multiple pieces of vorticity spawned all these disparate surface lows upon hitting the coast and as a result guidance was a mess... the night before was stressful in this forum... ultimately consolidated west and we had a blizzard

I thought it was March 13 2018 blizzard but that was a fujiwara of 2 distinct lows

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wxsniss said:

I know what you're referring to... now this is bothering me too lol... I remember dubbing it "mogwai" because multiple pieces of vorticity spawned all these disparate surface lows upon hitting the coast and as a result guidance was a mess... the night before was stressful in this forum... ultimately consolidated west and we had a blizzard

I thought it was March 13 2018 blizzard but that was a fujiwara of 2 distinct lows

That is exactly how I remember it. Just can't remember the damn date!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, OceanStWx said:

Learn to love it, because it’s going FV3 core and running to 60 hours and you’re going to lose the NAM and HRRR.

I don't hate it.  The 3km NAM is just as useless or useful... It bounces around but I've come to like the HRRR four main runs a day over the 3km NAM.  3km NAM has some high terrain errors in QPF/moisture progs that the HRRR seems to resolve better too.  That affects my opinion a bit.  Synoptic coastal storms might be different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 78Blizzard said:

Just looking at the latest radar loop of that offshore convection, along with the rest of our system.  The convection seems to be drying up just off NC coast, and that main blob doesn't seem to be strengthening.  Right now, anyway.

 

 

theres dry air in that area hope it eats it away

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The current radar presentation doesn't seem bad at all and actually looks promising. There's a ton of juice available with this. Most model guidance really had this dissipating a bit as it moved across the mountains but that hasn't been the case. Some pretty impressive snow totals too out of WV/KY/TN. 0z too doesn't seem awful 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...