Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,607
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Tracking Jan 7 coastal storm. Lingering compression/flow velocity has not lent to consensus, but it seems at 30 hours out.. finally?


Typhoon Tip
 Share

Recommended Posts

Oh... I know ( or 'think' I do - ) what happened.

The American model products don't correct ( don't think nearly to the scale or degree that the foreign clusters do ) for input garbage.  This smacks pretty loudly as the GEFs 'AI' gulping in back-wash initialization - it's sacked the whole ensemble mean too deeply and pervasively for me to believe this was organic.

I bet the Euro negated faulty inputs. 

That said, I do think there is going to be some uncertainty wrt to the SPV spit over the NE Pac, and how much gets inserted downs stream. And if/should the ridge bulge in the back side, that ups the ante -

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Oh... I know ( or 'think' I do - ) what happened.

The American model products don't correct ( don't think nearly to the scale or degree that the foreign clusters do ) for input garbage.  This smacks pretty loudly as the GEFs 'AI' gulping in back initialization - it's sacked the whole ensemble mean too deeply and pervasively for me to believe this was organic.

I bet the Euro negated faulty inputs. 

That said, I do think there is going to be some uncertainty wrt to the SPV spit over the NE Pac, and how much gets inserted downs stream. And if/should the ridge bulge in the back side, that ups the ante -

So are we saying that the recently updated GFS model is still garbage, lol?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 78Blizzard said:

So are we saying that the recently updated GFS model is still garbage, lol?

Ha!   ... uh, I dunno 'bout that.

It's more like the population of the initialization grid.  There used to exist this "model diagnostic discussion," back when it was carried under the NCEP banner.  But then it became WPC ... etc, and I don't think it's covered there?  But they would flag this in discussion and surmise how it may/or not have effected the model processing.

Now would be a good time for that -

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Ha!   ... uh, I dunno 'bout that.

It's more like the population of the initialization grid.  There used to exist this "model diagnostic discussion," back when it was carried under the NCEP banner.  But then it became WPC ... etc, and I don't think it's covered there?  But they would flag this in discussion and surmise how it may/or not have effected the model processing.

Now would be a good time for that -

Could the unexpected intensity and location of today’s storm have an affect on the ultimate path of the next one?

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mahk_webstah said:

Could the unexpected intensity and location of today’s storm have an affect on the ultimate path of the next one?

I think there’s too much distance between the events.   I think the idea of a hugger is more viable than ots at this point.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, weathafella said:

I think there’s too much distance between the events.   I think the idea of a hugger is more viable than it’s at this point.

Without any blocking or something to shunt it out to see one would think so. But panics driven by shifts of models five days out are fairly common even with someone as old as me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...