dryslot Posted January 1, 2022 Share Posted January 1, 2022 18z GEFS, Lot of west amped members in here but a lot of spread to boot as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Go Kart Mozart Posted January 1, 2022 Share Posted January 1, 2022 On 1/1/2022 at 11:13 PM, dryslot said: 18z GEFS, Lot of west amped members in here but a lot of spread to boot as well. Expand That 969 just east of ACK looks good to me. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 1, 2022 Share Posted January 1, 2022 On 1/1/2022 at 11:09 PM, Ginx snewx said: Read it wrong but that's some asute deep thinking Ray. Woah never knew Expand All I mean is that the NAO block is gone, so it's still possible to get porked....but progressive flow mitigates that risk to a degree. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted January 1, 2022 Share Posted January 1, 2022 On 1/1/2022 at 11:16 PM, Go Kart Mozart said: That 969 just east of ACK looks good to me. Expand Sign me up for that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted January 1, 2022 Share Posted January 1, 2022 Nothing to slow this one down either so high totals will have a limit. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhineasC Posted January 1, 2022 Share Posted January 1, 2022 On 1/1/2022 at 11:13 PM, dryslot said: 18z GEFS, Lot of west amped members in here but a lot of spread to boot as well. Expand West amped is good. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ineedsnow Posted January 1, 2022 Share Posted January 1, 2022 On 1/1/2022 at 11:13 PM, dryslot said: 18z GEFS, Lot of west amped members in here but a lot of spread to boot as well. Expand I'll take the 969mb just east of the cape 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George001 Posted January 1, 2022 Share Posted January 1, 2022 On 1/1/2022 at 11:18 PM, dryslot said: Nothing to slow this one down either so high totals will have a limit. Expand Eh, while this won’t be a blizzard of 78 redux or anything crazy like that, it could still be a really big storm. In my area I’m more worried about getting screwed by ptype than the pattern being too progressive and quick moving. Even a 10-12 hour quick moving bomb can easily produce over a foot. If the low gets down to the 970s or 960s like some of the ensembles are hinting at, areas that stay all snow could possibly even approach or exceed 2 feet. The pattern was fairly progressive in Feb 2015, didnt stop my area from getting 3 storms with 12+ inches of snow and blizzard conditions. 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIPPYVALLEY Posted January 1, 2022 Share Posted January 1, 2022 On 1/1/2022 at 11:13 PM, dryslot said: 18z GEFS, Lot of west amped members in here but a lot of spread to boot as well. Expand I’ll take my chances with amped. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIPPYVALLEY Posted January 1, 2022 Share Posted January 1, 2022 On 1/1/2022 at 11:18 PM, dryslot said: Nothing to slow this one down either so high totals will have a limit. Expand Weenies will weenie out regardless. Set the limit at jacks of 10” but weenie goggles will buy into the run to run 18” Kuchera nocturnal emissions. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 1, 2022 Share Posted January 1, 2022 On 1/1/2022 at 11:12 PM, 40/70 Benchmark said: I don't care what you call RNA. Expand What does your R stand for? R for Ray ? Secondary question .. do you call the inverse + RNA? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 1, 2022 Share Posted January 1, 2022 On 1/1/2022 at 11:41 PM, Damage In Tolland said: What does your R stand for? R for Ray ? Secondary question .. do you call the inverse + RNA? Expand Wasn't there a poster by the name of RNA at Eastern Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted January 1, 2022 Share Posted January 1, 2022 On 1/1/2022 at 11:41 PM, Damage In Tolland said: What does your R stand for? R for Ray ? Secondary question .. do you call the inverse + RNA? Expand Old terminology was PNA and RNA. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 2, 2022 Share Posted January 2, 2022 On 1/1/2022 at 11:47 PM, dendrite said: Old terminology was PNA and RNA. Expand But what did the antiquated R stand for ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted January 2, 2022 Share Posted January 2, 2022 On 1/2/2022 at 12:00 AM, Damage In Tolland said: But what did the antiquated R stand for ? Expand Reverse Here’s a journal article with it. https://journals.ametsoc.org/downloadpdf/journals/clim/12/6/1520-0442_1999_012_1796_lswral_2.0.co_2.pdf 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted January 2, 2022 Author Share Posted January 2, 2022 Not to turn on the d-drip and walk away but ... just got around to looking over some of those individual 12z GEF members. HUGEly improved consensus over 00z for one just in general. But, 10 or so individual members have very large snow ( yes SNOW!) totals falling in a short period of time between 144 and 156/168 hours. The storm is moving right along, but in those members, it appears enough anyway. They cross the bomb threshold, ... large QPF totals on the west side of neg tilted trough/wind max along ideal trajectory; riding up immediate astride NJ-MA. There is probably has excessive frontogen UVM banding in the I-95 collocation... probably why they are turning the moisture upside down. I mean ... not to get into details. LOL No but it is a lot of fun to see this cinema... I give you that. It's been a while since we could enjoy a good game of speculation pong 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 2, 2022 Share Posted January 2, 2022 On 1/2/2022 at 12:01 AM, dendrite said: Reverse Here’s a journal article with it. https://journals.ametsoc.org/downloadpdf/journals/clim/12/6/1520-0442_1999_012_1796_lswral_2.0.co_2.pdf Expand The scientific community calls it PNA though . As far as we know, they always have . It’s either a + or a - PNA in 1984-2022 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted January 2, 2022 Share Posted January 2, 2022 On 1/2/2022 at 12:09 AM, Damage In Tolland said: The scientific community calls it PNA though . As far as we know, they always have . It’s either a + or a - PNA in 1984-2022 Expand I just linked you a scientific article from 1998 referring to -PNA as RNA. But okay. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted January 2, 2022 Author Share Posted January 2, 2022 This is just an arbitrary member .. but there a lot with this look - 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 2, 2022 Share Posted January 2, 2022 On 1/2/2022 at 12:11 AM, dendrite said: I just linked you a scientific article from 1998 referring to -PNA as RNA. But okay. Expand Similar to a TT post … 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 2, 2022 Share Posted January 2, 2022 On 1/1/2022 at 11:41 PM, Damage In Tolland said: What does your R stand for? R for Ray ? Secondary question .. do you call the inverse + RNA? Expand Reverse. I didn't come up with it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 2, 2022 Share Posted January 2, 2022 On 1/2/2022 at 12:06 AM, Typhoon Tip said: Not to turn on the d-drip and walk away but ... just got around to looking over some of those individual 12z GEF members. HUGEly improved consensus over 00z for one just in general. But, 10 or so individual members have very large snow ( yes SNOW!) totals falling in a short period of time between 144 and 156/168 hours. The storm is moving right along, but in those members, it appears enough anyway. They cross the bomb threshold, ... large QPF totals on the west side of neg tilted trough/wind max along ideal trajectory; riding up immediate astride NJ-MA. There is probably has excessive frontogen UVM banding in the I-95 collocation... probably why they are turning the moisture upside down. I mean ... not to get into details. LOL No but it is a lot of fun to see this cinema... I give you that. It's been a while since we could enjoy a good game of speculation pong Expand Turn on the d drip and walk away lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tim123 Posted January 2, 2022 Share Posted January 2, 2022 I will take the 975 over Vermont. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 2, 2022 Share Posted January 2, 2022 On 1/2/2022 at 12:14 AM, Typhoon Tip said: This is just an arbitrary member .. but there a lot with this look - Expand 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted January 2, 2022 Share Posted January 2, 2022 Some huggers/inland members of EPS but overall looks pretty solid for widespread good snows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted January 2, 2022 Share Posted January 2, 2022 On 1/1/2022 at 11:16 PM, 40/70 Benchmark said: All I mean is that the NAO block is gone, so it's still possible to get porked....but progressive flow mitigates that risk to a degree. Expand Thanks for stopping by -nao and being utterly useless. See ya in April… 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 2, 2022 Share Posted January 2, 2022 On 1/2/2022 at 1:25 AM, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said: Thanks for stopping by -nao and being utterly useless. See ya in April… Expand I think we'll do okay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted January 2, 2022 Share Posted January 2, 2022 On 1/2/2022 at 1:29 AM, 40/70 Benchmark said: I think we'll do okay. Expand Pna > nao 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted January 2, 2022 Share Posted January 2, 2022 On 1/2/2022 at 1:31 AM, MJO812 said: Pna > nao Expand On 1/2/2022 at 1:31 AM, MJO812 said: Pna > nao Expand Certainly not the case for YBY. The idea is to time things right with transient blocking in the North Atlantic. Ala 2014-15. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 2, 2022 Share Posted January 2, 2022 Its easy to shit on the NAO right now, but its misguided.....shit on the record RNA. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now