Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,597
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    DAinDC
    Newest Member
    DAinDC
    Joined

New Years Winter Storm


Chicago Storm
 Share

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, Hoosier said:

I'm not saying crazy high ratios, but I think something like 12:1 is doable closer to the lake.  Lower to start and higher toward the end.  

Going into BUFKIT, using max T method has ratios ~10:1 to start and finishing ~20:1, with ~12:1 during the heart of the event.

14.2" total.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Always find it amusing how stubborn models can be in their own solutions and not wanting to converge. Feel like overall most models have seemed closer to GFS with 0z nam being first run of nam with noticeable bump south. Euro being quite stubborn and really wanting to keep much higher totals quite nw of here likely because of stronger warm nose. Definitely not getting excited yet because any bump north on models and it will be a rainer or mix central here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Euro still leaving the door open for even more potential.

With the secondary wave and main trough ejection out of the West and another wave diving south from Canada…Better positioning and a more southward diving Canadian wave would allow for further develop a close secondary system and/or keep snows going longer.

ba862acfaf369cab7b95e0b01d41ac05.jpg


.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...