Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,598
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    PublicWorks143
    Newest Member
    PublicWorks143
    Joined

New Years Winter Storm


Chicago Storm
 Share

Recommended Posts

There are several things that are dictating this, the location of the lead wave, when/if it will phase, where the block across canada sets up, and how strong the front is with that system that travels across Canada.

There’s even more to it than that.

Obviously the lobe in Canada acting as a block and associated confluence, as you mentioned. …But also the fact there are three different waves coming into the west. There’s the initial wave, which is sort of cut off near the Cali Coast, and then two additional waves that dive south out of Canada, which will interact with said Cali wave.

So in the end, there’s probably at least 4 different moving parts to watch.


.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Hoosier said:

Believe it or not, the last time there was a 3" snowfall on New Year's Day in Chicago was back in 1984 (recall that the bulk of the storm in 1999 occurred on the 2nd).  And the calendar day record may be lower than you'd think... 5.0"

I keep thinking of those "if it snows 3 inches or more on new years day" deals

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m a bit skeptical that given this upper level configuration:
8470F765-74F7-4C5E-85FB-844589119981.thumb.png.12ebb5a17006633636a59937f4fffda3.png

We end up with a surface low this far north and well developed:

F994B868-50B5-49D2-9DBE-D67A0536DDDC.thumb.png.7b7a85ec2e24e73478e5336d33b5c928.png

To me, a sfc low track further south would fit the UL pattern better. Whether the UL setup on the 0z GFS is correct is another question entirely. Lots of moving parts for the models to put together — will probably take some time to iron out.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m a bit skeptical that given this upper level configuration:
8470F765-74F7-4C5E-85FB-844589119981.thumb.png.12ebb5a17006633636a59937f4fffda3.png
We end up with a surface low this far north and well developed:
F994B868-50B5-49D2-9DBE-D67A0536DDDC.thumb.png.7b7a85ec2e24e73478e5336d33b5c928.png

To me, a sfc low track further south would fit the UL pattern better. Whether the UL setup on the 0z GFS is correct is another question entirely. Lots of moving parts for the models to put together — will probably take some time to iron out.

The surface reflection, and whole storm for that matter, is a product of the Cali cut off wave that ejects out and interacts with the lead wave diving through the West. Really isn’t all that wrapped up or strong of a system, which is not surprising given what’s shown aloft.


.
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, hawkeye_wx said:

The trend tonight is for the Canadian upper energy to be more suppressive and keep the midwest storm farther south.  

Seems we've been stuck in this for like 4 years now. The lack of cross country bowling ball systems, or even a half phased storm has been incredible. Never thought id say id be okay with a stonger nw trend to start just to have a respectable storm somewhere other than the upper midwest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

still on track. It's all about not being in the "sweet spot" at this juncture. Board points for no one inquiring or posting " that run doesn't  matter as it has yet to be sampled" but the chants of "south and weaker" or "strung out POS" have been there from the start.  As usual just a snippet from RC's AFD at LOT can save you a lot of time if your in the Northern Illinois area:

"THE ENSEMBLE MEANS OF THE ECMWF AND GEFS HAVE A VERY GOOD SIGNAL  
FOR A SWATH OF SEVERAL INCHES OF SNOW INCLUDING A GOOD CHUNK OF  
THE CWA, ESPECIALLY NORTH CENTRAL AND NORTHERN ILLINOIS. OVERALL,  
THE NBM FORECAST FAVORS THE FARTHER NORTH MORE IMPACTFUL CAMPS, SO  
CATEGORICAL POPS FROM NBM WERE MAINTAINED ON SATURDAY. THERE'S  
ENOUGH MOVING PARTS TO THE SETUP THAT NOTEWORTHY CHANGES CAN BE  
EXPECTED AS KEY FEATURES MOVE ONTO THE PLAYING FIELD, THOUGH GIVEN  
HIGH POPS AT THIS LEAD TIME, CONFIDENCE IS A BIT ABOVE AVERAGE"

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...