Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,890
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    WichitaChiefSam
    Newest Member
    WichitaChiefSam
    Joined

January 2022 Obs/Disco


NorEastermass128
 Share

Recommended Posts

  On 1/3/2022 at 2:54 AM, PhineasC said:

I could see that in Baltimore, but then they will have QPF issues. Just so many ways to fail down there.

Expand  

The ICON modeled snow amounts (derived by the model…not vendor algorithms) has been 3-6”. I’ve seen that model underestimate amounts before, but I agree with you that I’d take the under on most of these clown maps.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/3/2022 at 2:12 AM, George001 said:

I still think Boston is getting more snow than DC from this one. Im convinced we see another big north shift tomorrow, the trough looks like it’s more neutral than the guidance currently had it. That is a really good sign.

Expand  

I read what you wrote earlier today.

The NAM shift for 00z was absolutely jarring, to say nothing of the SREF stuff.

i know the odds are against it with what is on the table but…

I still think significant snow is possible as far NW as a NYC/Norwich/Warwick/Plymouth line. 
 

Unfortunately I live significantly NW of that line and it’s highly unlikely I will see much more than an inch or two and that’s if the NW trend continues and verifies.

  • Like 1
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/3/2022 at 3:08 AM, IowaStorm05 said:

I read what you wrote earlier today.

The NAM shift for 00z was absolutely jarring, to say nothing of the SREF stuff.

i know the odds are against it with what is on the table but…

I still think significant snow is possible as far NW as a NYC/Norwich/Warwick line. 
 

Unfortunately I live significantly NW of that line and it’s highly unlikely I will see much more than an inch or two and that’s if the NW trend continues and verifies.

Expand  

Where are you? Tolland? I'm in Plainville. If I see a dusting.. I'd be surprised

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/3/2022 at 3:08 AM, IowaStorm05 said:

I read what you wrote earlier today.

The NAM shift for 00z was absolutely jarring, to say nothing of the SREF stuff.

i know the odds are against it with what is on the table but…

I still think significant snow is possible as far NW as a NYC/Norwich/Warwick line. 
 

Unfortunately I live significantly NW of that line and it’s highly unlikely I will see much more than an inch or two and that’s if the NW trend continues and verifies.

Expand  

You probably don’t even see that.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/3/2022 at 3:07 AM, weathafella said:

It’s 59 in RIC, now 49 at BWI/DCA, 59 at WAL.    If I were one of the weenies there I wouldn’t have a warm and fuzzy feel.   My call is no one in the cities of RIC/DCA/BWI exceeds 4 inches.

Expand  

Snow depth change products are all around 4 to 5 inches for those cities. Might be better between RIC and DCA, like CHO, where 6+ is being hit a little harder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/3/2022 at 3:08 AM, IowaStorm05 said:

I read what you wrote earlier today.

The NAM shift for 00z was absolutely jarring, to say nothing of the SREF stuff.

i know the odds are against it with what is on the table but…

I still think significant snow is possible as far NW as a NYC/Norwich/Warwick line. 
 

Unfortunately I live significantly NW of that line and it’s highly unlikely I will see much more than an inch or two and that’s if the NW trend continues and verifies.

Expand  

Better chance of seeing this tomorrow.

 Han-Palace.jpg

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/3/2022 at 3:13 AM, WinterWolf said:

He’s in windham or willimantic I think. None of us are seeing anything. If we lived in New Haven or Groton maybe we’d see a few flakes. But not up this way. 

Expand  

Odds are you’re right… but all it would take is a 30 to 50 mile shift northwest overnight… it’s showing signs of its potency already and that can make it tuck. 

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/3/2022 at 3:08 AM, IowaStorm05 said:

I read what you wrote earlier today.

The NAM shift for 00z was absolutely jarring, to say nothing of the SREF stuff.

i know the odds are against it with what is on the table but…

I still think significant snow is possible as far NW as a NYC/Norwich/Warwick/Plymouth line. 
 

Unfortunately I live significantly NW of that line and it’s highly unlikely I will see much more than an inch or two and that’s if the NW trend continues and verifies.

Expand  

Yeah it’s no guarantee but this reminds me of last December where Binghamton NY was forecasted like 2-4 the night before and ended up with 40. It’s a different pattern so it won’t get that far north and even jackpot areas aren’t even getting half that, but I’m still optimistic that it can get far enough north to give my area a plowable snowfall. I do still think Friday will be the bigger storm, and that one looks like it will be the opposite, farther north areas do better with rain snow lines being an issue for coastal areas.

  • Weenie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/3/2022 at 3:30 AM, George001 said:

Yeah it’s no guarantee but this reminds me of last December where Binghamton NY was forecasted like 2-4 the night before and ended up with 40. It’s a different pattern so it won’t get that far north and even jackpot areas aren’t even getting half that, but I’m still optimistic that it can get far enough north to give my area a plowable snowfall. I do still think Friday will be the bigger storm, and that one looks like it will be the opposite, farther north areas do better with rain snow lines being an issue for coastal areas.

Expand  

The F*cki** 00z GFS

 

A34ABF48-1F96-40ED-B492-831ED2707950.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/3/2022 at 3:48 AM, MJO812 said:

Tick north 

Expand  

 

  On 1/3/2022 at 3:56 AM, CoastalWx said:

I will saw this may be the only storm I’ve ever seen with a great H5 RH look overhead and dry at 700. That’s rather strange. 

Expand  

Can that fill in? That’s what the GFS kind of looks like. It’s potency forces it further north and west than it’s supposed to go, but a shallow dry layer eats into the QPF. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...