Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,792
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    manaja
    Newest Member
    manaja
    Joined

January Medium/Long Range Discussion


WinterWxLuvr
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, mattie g said:

Did I see a phase happening at 240?

Yes.  That was a beautiful evolution to what would have been a major east coast storm.  Can see the two separate shortwaves out west here 24hours before that map posted above:

gem_z500_vort_us_37.thumb.png.d4543f00659075b8c645b11918d60e4c.png

  • Like 13
  • Weenie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, dallen7908 said:

Where did all of our model snow go? Clockwise from upper left (18 UT yesterday, 00 UT today, 06 UT today, 12 UT today)  Through 12 UT next Friday; GFS

IMG_2371.JPG

Are we looking at the same weather model? The 12z GFS is a dream in the extended. All of that snow predicted on the first two frames fell yesterday.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, chris21 said:

Are we looking at the same weather model? The 12z GFS is a dream in the extended. All of that snow predicted on the first two frames fell yesterday.

Good point - bad post by me.  Why is the 12z GFS a dream in the extended?  Verbatim, most of our area gets ~1" of snow during the next 384 hours.  I assume you like the upper air pattern etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, dallen7908 said:

Good point - bad post by me.  Why is the 12z GFS a dream in the extended?  Verbatim, most of our area gets ~1" of snow during the next 384 hours.  I assume you like the upper air pattern etc. 

again, I’m not sure you’re looking at the latest 12z GFS run. I see far more than an inch accumulated in the next 384 hours and no fewer than three distinct threats with cold air entrenched essentially throughout the run. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, chris21 said:

again, I’m not sure you’re looking at the latest 12z GFS run. I see far more than an inch accumulated in the next 384 hours and no fewer than three distinct threats with cold air entrenched essentially throughout the run. 

This Sunday, next Friday timeframe and again around the 18th and 21st

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Ji said:

dang man...why did the run have to end?

 

gem_z500_vort_us_41.png

It doesn’t matter because it’s day 10 and whatever it showed you can’t take it exactly as is so that’s good enough.  But we know how it was heading. That trough digging about to go neutral over the miss valley as the system in New England departs leaving room to amplify up the coast and  fresh arctic cold in place with the rain snow line in Georgia to start as the WAA gets going. It was going to end well. Use your imagination how well. 

  • Like 2
  • Weenie 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, dallen7908 said:

Good point - bad post by me.  Why is the 12z GFS a dream in the extended?  Verbatim, most of our area gets ~1" of snow during the next 384 hours.  I assume you like the upper air pattern etc. 

  1. Don't concern yourself with snowfall maps
  2. The snowfall map (at least on TT) isn't yet out to 384
  3. The pattern is fantastic. Look at that first and foremost and let the chips fall. There's reason to be excited (tempered excitement, of course) by it.
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mattie g said:
  1. Don't concern yourself with snowfall maps
  2. The snowfall map (at least on TT) isn't yet out to 384
  3. The pattern is fantastic. Look at that first and foremost and let the chips fall. There's reason to be excited (tempered excitement, of course) by it.

 

80644EF7-3BB4-4FC1-93D9-487F505856EA.png

  • Like 3
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, WinterWxLuvr said:

You don’t think that would just slide off the coast?

 

38 minutes ago, WxUSAF said:

Yes.  That was a beautiful evolution to what would have been a major east coast storm.  Can see the two separate shortwaves out west here 24hours before that map posted above:

gem_z500_vort_us_37.thumb.png.d4543f00659075b8c645b11918d60e4c.png

What he said!   If you just look at the NS over New England and how far south the baroclinic boundary is you might think so but the NS and SS are phasing and the trough is digging pretty far west, about to go neutral near the Miss River and the flow is relaxing ahead of it. My guess is that leads to an absolute bomb up the east coast.  Probably a very high impact and large expansive storm due to a deep STJ moisture fetch aided by the warm gulf then the Atlantic and used to maximum impact by a fully mature phased cyclone. That’s the kind of storm with a huge win zone between the high ratio powder on the NW side to the high qpfs closer to the boundary and the fact that even places that might change to ice/rain north of NC had to go through a long period of WAA precip first. The kind of storm we aren’t having to worry about sharp edges and exactly where a band sets up to eek out a few inches. 
 

Alas it’s a day 10 op run so enjoy it and imagine living the dream then move on. @WxUSAF feel free to correct me but that was my impression of where that was headed.  

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly though, while I was pretty confident this wasn’t going to be one of the REALLY bad dreg Nina’s I still had conservative expectations in terms of final #s. But had I known most of the forum would be at or close to double digits by Jan 10 heading into prime climo AND shockingly the STJ would be showing signs of behaving in a rather un Nina way…I might have gone even higher. At the least we’ve already avoided this year being in that dreaded list of years we all hate to even mention. But with some luck MAYBE this year has the chance to be one of the rare Nina exceptions. No I’m not talking 1996 level necessarily but the rare Nina that surpasses climo isn’t unfathomable given the current results and coming pattern. 

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

Honestly though, while I was pretty confident this wasn’t going to be one of the REALLY bad dreg Nina’s I still had conservative expectations in terms of final #s. But had I known most of the forum would be at or close to double digits by Jan 10 heading into prime climo AND shockingly the STJ would be showing signs of behaving in a rather un Nina way…I might have gone even higher. At the least we’ve already avoided this year being in that dreaded list of years we all hate to even mention. But with some luck MAYBE this year has the chance to be one of the rare Nina exceptions. No I’m not talking 1996 level necessarily but the rare Nina that surpasses climo isn’t unfathomable given the current results and coming pattern. 

Agree.  As you've said many times, a lot of our snowfall comes down to luck.  The pattern this week was "decent", but not spectacular, with "decent" cold air, but far from arctic air masses.  And we scored twice with advisory/warning level events.  That's some solid luck.  Just some normal luck for the rest of the month with the pattern being as good as advertised and we could end up with a very special and memorable winter period.  

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

Honestly though, while I was pretty confident this wasn’t going to be one of the REALLY bad dreg Nina’s I still had conservative expectations in terms of final #s. But had I known most of the forum would be at or close to double digits by Jan 10 heading into prime climo AND shockingly the STJ would be showing signs of behaving in a rather un Nina way…I might have gone even higher. At the least we’ve already avoided this year being in that dreaded list of years we all hate to even mention. But with some luck MAYBE this year has the chance to be one of the rare Nina exceptions. No I’m not talking 1996 level necessarily but the rare Nina that surpasses climo isn’t unfathomable given the current results and coming pattern. 

Feel free to mention that rare January of 1996... you never know.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, WxUSAF said:

Agree.  As you've said many times, a lot of our snowfall comes down to luck.  The pattern this week was "decent", but not spectacular, with "decent" cold air, but far from arctic air masses.  And we scored twice with advisory/warning level events.  That's some solid luck.  Just some normal luck for the rest of the month with the pattern being as good as advertised and we could end up with a very special and memorable winter period.  

Maybe this week was the 30,000 ft view big picture “luck” balancing out because I’ve felt the DC area has had pretty awful luck on the whole much of the last 5 years. Don’t get me wrong the prevailing patterns were a mix of decent but flawed and bad much of the time and I’m not saying DC should have done well…but it takes a special kind of bad luck to do as awful as it did Imo. There were enough “decent” periods even in some of those really bad almost snowless winters that I felt like DC should have lucked into at least one decent event. But it’s random. Maybe the randomness turned in our favor finally. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

Maybe this week was the 30,000 ft view big picture “luck” balancing out because I’ve felt the DC area has had pretty awful luck on the whole much of the last 5 years. Don’t get me wrong the prevailing patterns were a mix of decent but flawed and bad much of the time and I’m not saying DC should have done well…but it takes a special kind of bad luck to do as awful as it did Imo. There were enough “decent” periods even in some of those really bad almost snowless winters that I felt like DC should have lucked into at least one decent event. But it’s random. Maybe the randomness turned in our favor finally. 

Yeah perhaps.  A bit of even-ing out.  Jan 2019 was the last luck DC has had for sure with the mesoscale band adding several more inches at the end of the storm.  I caught that band as well, but it stopped literally a couple miles to my east.  Last year was a hair's breadth from being really great for the whole region, we had the storms, but couldn't get or keep a "good enough" airmass to save our lives.  Hence 5-6" at DCA, 17" for me, and like 50" for you.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

Maybe this week was the 30,000 ft view big picture “luck” balancing out because I’ve felt the DC area has had pretty awful luck on the whole much of the last 5 years. Don’t get me wrong the prevailing patterns were a mix of decent but flawed and bad much of the time and I’m not saying DC should have done well…but it takes a special kind of bad luck to do as awful as it did Imo. There were enough “decent” periods even in some of those really bad almost snowless winters that I felt like DC should have lucked into at least one decent event. But it’s random. Maybe the randomness turned in our favor finally. 

Living in the DC area most of my my life, I think we have really interesting climatology.  Growing up in Charles County, MD, my mom used to always tell me that we got our biggest storms from the South. She wasn't really a fan of snow, but she did watch a lot of Bob Ryan over the years!  I've since learned a great deal about winter weather dynamics from the amazing people in this forum   Most places in the country aren't between the mountains and the ocean.  I think our location makes for very interesting winter weather tracking (even if it's often frustrating). We definitely have to thread the needle to get those perfect storms, but sometimes we do just get lucky.  Here's to more "snow on snow" this month!

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...