Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,607
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

New Years Storm System, Dec 30th - Jan 2nd


northpittweather

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 659
  • Created
  • Last Reply

12z GFS a tad west of the 0z run with the sfc low still not occluding by the time it gets time IA pulling up alot of warm air/moisture.

This has big potential for severe if things play out right, but still along way off.

I am just concerned because the last 9 model runs have been fairly consistent

If you live in the Ohio Valley on New Years Eve and New Years Day, watch out!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thing is amazingly consistent for being so far out. Of course the last system was that way too, and things ended up changing. Every storm is different though.

I just wonder how far north a surface warm front will be able to go with such a deep snow pack in place. It's certainly going to slow it down, but just how much is the key. I can see the warm front getting hung up somewhere over the deep snow pack, and creating a widespread corridor of freezing rain which could result in full on ice storm conditions somewhere. I would also anticipate an earlier occlusion due to the slow progress of the warm front. The low-level jet will be very strong though, so I guess it's possible the warm front will make it as far north as forecast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the models keep showing this thing tracking like it has been, you might only have to drive to the Ohio River area, maybe Beau's neck of the woods.

I don't know if I've ever seen SPC be bullish on a long range winter severe threat north of the Ohio River. It's hard enough at the 2-3 day time range lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The GFS wind fields are off the charts. 850 mb jet of 80 kts and in excess of 75 kts down to the 900 mb level in eastern Indiana/western Ohio at 192 hours.

I noticed that as well but on the 00Z ECMWF operational, the 850 hPa winds over the Great Lakes was about 55-65 knots post cold frontal passage. Seems quite a bit off as the pressure gradient doesn't support that and there isn't an extreme amount of cold air behind the front (things go back to slightly below climo, it would appear). The ensembles are a lot less, with about 40 kt winds at 850 hPa.

At this point I don't see any severe weather potential (aside from synoptically driven wind gusts) in the upper Mid-West.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, +12C at 850 on Jan 2. The front is still well back in MI so there could even be sunshine. Assuming insolation occurs and the snowpack has melted, I'm thinking mid 50s next Sunday are possible. As much as I love winter, warmth like that'll feel good after a long absence.

I agree, but I assume there will be fog issues, limiting high temps.. Generally speaking, all the way up to Detroit upper 50s are not our of the question, even low to mid 60.. I Guess this is our January THaw early.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since this storm is so far out in time I wouldn't at all be surprised if the models are focusing too much on the lead wave. We've seen this happen many times. If a second and stronger shortwave arrives later on in the evolution, then we could see a stronger, more southerly developing low that would track further east. Obviously none of the models show this now, but since this thing is so far in the future I wouldn't be surprised if something like that happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noticed that as well but on the 00Z ECMWF operational, the 850 hPa winds over the Great Lakes was about 55-65 knots post cold frontal passage. Seems quite a bit off as the pressure gradient doesn't support that and there isn't an extreme amount of cold air behind the front (things go back to slightly below climo, it would appear). The ensembles are a lot less, with about 40 kt winds at 850 hPa.

At this point I don't see any severe weather potential (aside from synoptically driven wind gusts) in the upper Mid-West.

Agree, in the Upper Midwest in Wisconsin, Northern Michigan, and areas like that

You go into the Ohio Valley (Ohio,Indiana, Southern Michigan, Kentucky, Western Pennsylvania), based on what the models show, an impressive outbreak is possible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since this storm is so far out in time I wouldn't at all be surprised if the models are focusing too much on the lead wave. We've seen this happen many times. If a second and stronger shortwave arrives later on in the evolution, then we could see a stronger, more southerly developing low that would track further east. Obviously none of the models show this now, but since this thing is so far in the future I wouldn't be surprised if something like that happens.

Hope so, at 500, the 12z GFS operational is the farthest NW.

f168.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

seriously i think somebody needs to start one this evening

SPC is bullish on the threat, and were talking about a threat of an outbreak north of the ohio valley in the middle of the winter

SPC is not being bullish on the threat. If they were, there would be a big risk area outlined already. They also haven't mentioned the first thing about an outbreak ANYWHERE, much less north of the Ohio River. YOU are the one talking about that. Seriously dude, what kind of grass are you smoking???

As far as the threat itself, like the "Octobomb", this appears to be a forced linear event to me. The earlier this occludes, the less quality moisture and instability there will be to work with from the Ohio Valley southward, but with at least marginally adequate thermos and the strength of the dynamics, I'd expect the potential for at least significant wind damage and isolated tornadoes over a rather large area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOT

SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES OPENING UP WARM MOIST GULF FLOW INTO THE

REGION. DEEP UPPER TROF IS PROGGED TO DIG OVER THE WESTERN CONUS

WITH AMPLIFYING RIDGE OVER THE EASTERN CONUS. GFS ENSEMBLE MEAN

BRINGS LOW PRESSURE CENTER UP INTO THE UPPER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY BY

FRIDAY NIGHT. HONING IN ON THE TRACK OF THE LOW WILL BE KEY TO THE

END OF WEEK FORECAST...BUT SEEMS TO BE A GENERAL CONCENSUS IN THE

MODELS FOR NOW THAT THE LOW WILL TRACK TO THE NORTHWEST OF THE

FORECAST AREA KEEPING US IN THE WARM SECTOR WITH STRONG SOUTHERLY

FLOW. WILDCARD MAY BE HOW WELL MODELS HANDLE EXISTING SNOWPACK

AFFECTING WHERE STRONGEST BAROCLINICITY SETS UP...POSSIBLY FAVORING

A MORE SOUTHERN TRACK. BUT SHOULD MODELS PAN OUT...THERE WILL LIKELY

BE A BIG WARMUP IN STORE WITH HIGHS IN THE 50S IN THE REALM OF

POSSIBILITY...AS WELL AS STRONG THUNDERSTORMS AHEAD OF COLD FRONT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SPC is not being bullish on the threat. If they were, there would be a big risk area outlined already. They also haven't mentioned the first thing about an outbreak ANYWHERE, much less north of the Ohio River. YOU are the one talking about that. Seriously dude, what kind of grass are you smoking???

As far as the threat itself, like the "Octobomb", this appears to be a forced linear event to me. The earlier this occludes, the less quality moisture and instability there will be to work with from the Ohio Valley southward, but with at least marginally adequate thermos and the strength of the dynamics, I'd expect the potential for at least significant wind damage and isolated tornadoes over a rather large area.

:whistle:, I still think the GFS is still a little bit too slow, expect a threat on Friday into Saturday

just to mention Greg Forbes had a live update talking about Christmas Tornadoes, and he mentioned at the end of the the live segment, he mentioned a active severe pattern and a quite rare one may be forming for the Midwest and South during New Years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As for the storm itself I think the biggest thing that would be a concern for me would be if/when it occludes beyond that it certainly looks impressive right now. Also as mentioned in the January thread I think the first wave could have some ice issues with it too, which could be its own thread, but I'd give that a day or so before breaking that away from this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...