Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,607
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Wednesday’s Amazing Event 12/8/21


SnowenOutThere
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, CAPE said:

For the superstitious, the bad mojo thread title didn't help. :(

All threat threads should be more encouraging and supportive because weather knows.  This one got messed up from the start because Ma Nature's feelings were hurt.  

year-without-a-santa-claus.jpg

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mappy said:

so its @SnowenOutThere fault. 

And the thing is, he kept droning on and on and on about making a thread. I’m not even references the superstitious bullshit, it’s just the fact that we all kinda knew it wasn’t going to be a big deal worthy of a thread 3 and 4 days out. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, stormtracker said:

And the thing is, he kept droning on and on and on about making a thread. I’m not even references the superstitious bullshit, it’s just the fact that we all kinda knew it wasn’t going to be a big deal worthy of a thread 3 and 4 days out. 

Maybe next time he will "leave" it alone and not make a thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And the thing is, he kept droning on and on and on about making a thread. I’m not even references the superstitious bullshit, it’s just the fact that we all kinda knew it wasn’t going to be a big deal worthy of a thread 3 and 4 days out. 

c’mon guys - lay off a bit. threads are good for archival purposes and keeping our discussions organized. it’s not like making a thread is a major use of time and resources. if we all truly knew this would be nothing of course there wouldn’t be a thread - but this seemed like a potential 1-3”/T-2 when it was made.
  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NorthArlington101 said:


c’mon guys - lay off a bit. threads are good for archival purposes and keeping our discussions organized. it’s not like making a thread is a major use of time and resources. if we all truly knew this would be nothing of course there wouldn’t be a thread - but this seemed like a potential 1-3”/T-2 when it was made.

Haha, archival? Who the hell is gonna look back and want to read this stuff?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, stormtracker said:

And the thing is, he kept droning on and on and on about making a thread. I’m not even references the superstitious bullshit, it’s just the fact that we all kinda knew it wasn’t going to be a big deal worthy of a thread 3 and 4 days out. 

You might think it’s bs, but it sure seems to happen a bunch. Maybe it’s jus that time period where models get past their biases but it sure seems like every time we start a thread outside of about 2 days, the storm trends downhill fast. I think a 48 rule would be great. Unless it’s one of our historic storms. 48 hours is enough time to get all of the meaningful discussion in.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha, archival? Who the hell is gonna look back and want to read this stuff?

Not this one, that’s for sure lol.

But a couple weeks ago in banter we were pouring over the Jan 2016 threads. The consensus and scale there was a totally different scenario, but if we believed in jinxes too hard we would’ve had like 5 days of fun model runs and disco buried in the LR thread. That kinda sucks.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...