Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,607
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Wednesday 12/8 Possible Snow/Ice/Rain? Discussion


Torch Tiger
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I would prefer it not be there, I don't care where it ends up. Those are the kiss of death for a nice event.

I would too, We just need the northern stream to keep digging SE to get that surface low back further west, That's one of the keys and for it to stay amped up as well, Heights out ahead were somewhat better too so a combo of all of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dryslot said:

I would too, We just need the northern stream to keep digging SE to get that surface low back further west, That's one of the keys and for it to stay amped up as well, Heights out ahead were somewhat better too so a combo of all of it.

That, to me, is an artifact of the modeling being ambivalent in relation to whether or not to commit more N stream energy...I mean, theoretically it could be real, but it will probably either evolve into a real event or fade away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cold Miser said:

...Because warm December weather always gets people in the holiday spirit.  Brown ground, mild temps, and boring weather.  Such a great thing to look forward to.

At least the timing is such that we should be able to look ahead to the change during the holiday GTG.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

That, to me, is an artifact of the modeling being ambivalent in relation to whether or not to commit more N stream energy...I mean, theoretically it could be real, but it will probably either evolve into a real event or fade away.

It try's too inject more northern stream energy, But you don't get it to capture and close off until its well north of here, That's why i want to see it keep digging.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TauntonBlizzard2013 said:

We punt… I’m not hinging anything on the NAM

When the NAM consistently shows the same idea beyond 48 it has a tendency to be onto something.  I usually discount the NAM when it makes wild run to run shifts but since the 18Z run yesterday it has not wavered a whole lot.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

The safest call right now is probably a general 1-3".

Last night's 00z GGEM is the only current model run that didn't have at least an inch or two....and it's probably going to cave at 12z given what he RGEM has done since 00z.

It's getting fairly likely we see some accumulating snows over a good chunk of SNE. Whether that's an inch or two or something more prolific remains to be seen.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

GFS trough was deeper but it looked slightly more progressive so it was kind of a wash with 06z for sensible wx impact. PRecip was maybe a little more widespread than 06z.

do you have any idea why the weather.cod maps are so bullish on snow for tonight on the GFS and GEFS? do they run cold?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tamarack said:

Franklin County and IVTs - things that never meet.  The 0.6" from today's warm rain may be more snow than falls here Wednesday.

Right now, I don't expect much if any unless this keeps ticking west on upcoming runs, Its rare for the IVT here as well, Certainly not going to rely on it to unfold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...