Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Western PA/Pittsburgh Winter 2021/22 Discussion


meatwad
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, north pgh said:

I think Snow cover is overrated and I don’t worry much about it anymore. We should still have a few inches on the ground tonight and nice cold for the Weekend to set up our next storm early next week. 

Its all subjective, but snow cover is less overrated than single digits and bare ground imho. If its going to be cold, and no snow is falling there might as well be some on the ground.

1 hour ago, TimB84 said:

That’s what I mean. Whenever we get a pattern that looks good for snow retention, it gets put in jeopardy by a day that was supposed to be overcast and struggle to reach 40 instead torching well into the mid-40s with lots of sun.

WAA is almost always under modeled, hence why during a storm we get the warm nose. It does suck, but there should be enough liquid in the snow / frozen ground underneath / lower sun angle through filtered overcast that we don't lose to much. Its going to compact but whatever refreezes should having some staying power.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Front of my house faces north toward the street. The backyard is protected by trees, so it still has a solid snowpack. The front yard is somewhat protected by my house, so it still has a decent snowpack. (Except in areas where my dog trampled down the snow, which are obviously a bit worse off.) Across the street where there is much less protection from the sun, there are large patches of green visible. And still 3 hours of daylight and several more hours of temps above freezing to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, TimB84 said:

Front of my house faces north toward the street. The backyard is protected by trees, so it still has a solid snowpack. The front yard is somewhat protected by my house, so it still has a decent snowpack. (Except in areas where my dog trampled down the snow, which are obviously a bit worse off.) Across the street where there is much less protection from the sun, there are large patches of green visible. And still 3 hours of daylight and several more hours of temps above freezing to go.

There's literally nothing we can do, there will still be snow, and it will be very cold through the weekend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ahoff said:

Just saying.  Enjoy the snow you have.  We have big cold coming and could always get more in this pattern.

All of that is true. It’s just, there was a time within a lot of our lifetimes that you could get 9” of snow in the climatologically coldest part of winter and it would be reasonable to expect it to have some staying power and not have the majority of it melt within 60 hours of the end of the storm. Then again, there was also a time within a lot of our lifetimes that highs near 20 and lows in the single digits to near 0 wouldn’t be described as “big cold”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For example, a couple randomly selected years with a good snowstorm in January:

January 19-20, 2001: 6.8” of snow fell, snow depth remained 4”+ through 1/29.

January 7, 1996: 9.2” of snow fell, snow depth remained 6”+ through 1/17 (albeit with a couple smaller reinforcing events in between).

We just didn’t torch right after these events in years past.

And here we are, only down to 41 with snow continuing to melt at 8pm on a day that was only supposed to get to 40.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TimB84 said:

All of that is true. It’s just, there was a time within a lot of our lifetimes that you could get 9” of snow in the climatologically coldest part of winter and it would be reasonable to expect it to have some staying power and not have the majority of it melt within 60 hours of the end of the storm. Then again, there was also a time within a lot of our lifetimes that highs near 20 and lows in the single digits to near 0 wouldn’t be described as “big cold”.

They’re 15-20 below average, that’s always big cold.  We can’t expect to have -10 every year.  Ironically, today is the anniversary of our coldest temperature ever -22.  That’s massive cold.  But I’d say near 0 is always big cold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, TimB84 said:

For example, a couple randomly selected years with a good snowstorm in January:

January 19-20, 2001: 6.8” of snow fell, snow depth remained 4”+ through 1/29.

January 7, 1996: 9.2” of snow fell, snow depth remained 6”+ through 1/17 (albeit with a couple smaller reinforcing events in between).

We just didn’t torch right after these events in years past.

And here we are, only down to 41 with snow continuing to melt at 8pm on a day that was only supposed to get to 40.

Also the “torch” is one day.  Not like we got 9” then a week of 50.  We got 9”, then 45 for one day two days after, then 10-20 below normal.  It happens, I wouldn’t think this is so unusual.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ahoff said:

They’re 15-20 below average, that’s always big cold.  We can’t expect to have -10 every year.  Ironically, today is the anniversary of our coldest temperature ever -22.  That’s massive cold.  But I’d say near 0 is always big cold.

So you’d consider the days of +15 to +20 that we get at least once in just about every non-summer month to be big heat?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just took out the dog. Winds are howling and temps are starting to fall. 35 degrees.

 

Icy Roadways Possible Overnight Across the Region...

Rapidly falling temperatures behind a cold front combined with
earlier snowmelt could result in icy conditions / areas of black
ice along untreated roadways and surfaces overnight. Motorists
and those out and about are urged to use extra caution.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting to hear Smily this morning talking about accumulations of more than 1" for next tuesday. I think he is talking about the bowling ball of a cut off low that is going to find itself sitting out over Arizona. The GFS shows this eventually getting caught up in a relatively zonal flow and moving east towards us with some form of precipitation. From what I can tell, the GFS is the only one picking up on this energy moving in our direction. Euro has it south and never really materializing. Am I missing something here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MikeB_01 said:

Interesting to hear Smily this morning talking about accumulations of more than 1" for next tuesday. I think he is talking about the bowling ball of a cut off low that is going to find itself sitting out over Arizona. The GFS shows this eventually getting caught up in a relatively zonal flow and moving east towards us with some form of precipitation. From what I can tell, the GFS is the only one picking up on this energy moving in our direction. Euro has it south and never really materializing. Am I missing something here?

GFS has been better this year, lol.  Maybe that's it.  24th-25th was a period mentioned for possibly something.

He's also keeps PM snow for Sunday too.  Not sure why?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Ahoff said:

GFS has been better this year, lol.  Maybe that's it.  24th-25th was a period mentioned for possibly something.

He's also keeps PM snow for Sunday too.  Not sure why?

TWC sees the Monday-Tuesday thing as a possible low end advisory type event, and is carrying a chance of snow on Sunday, so maybe he got it from there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ahoff said:

GFS has been better this year, lol.  Maybe that's it.  24th-25th was a period mentioned for possibly something.

He's also keeps PM snow for Sunday too.  Not sure why?

 

1 hour ago, TimB84 said:

TWC sees the Monday-Tuesday thing as a possible low end advisory type event, and is carrying a chance of snow on Sunday, so maybe he got it from there?

Sunday is the clipper no? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, dj3 said:

Snowacane is back on the 12 GFS for the 28-30th timeframe but it doesn't track inland stays mostly offshore. 

It is, unfortunately, the pattern changer. The 500 pattern looks much more like December after that, but it’s a week and a half away and hopefully won’t have the kind of staying power it had in December.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...