Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,603
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

December 2021


MJO812
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, SnoSki14 said:

The western trough will be a problem until wavelengths change.

Wouldn't be surprised if March ends up as the coldest/snowiest month. 

Yes thats when wavelengths shorten and you can realistically have troughs on both coasts.  This happened in the 50s too and has been happening as of late (along with more east coast TC landfalls just like we had back then.)  But the point which still holds is if March is your snowiest month then you haven't had a very good snowfall season.  We can still be above average with snowfall but definitely not blockbuster.  Which is fine, I think most would settle for 30" or even slightly less than that.  Anything more would be a bonus, not impossible but not very likely (1955-56 is an example of that as is 2017-18.)

 

 

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, LibertyBell said:

It seems though if we could just nail that December snowfall forecast (the 3" marker you mentioned) we could at least make a pretty safe bet on whether the winter will be plus or minus snowfall wise.....let's for the sake of simplicity say average NYC snowfall is 30".....do you think it's a safe bet if we just use that one data point and project snowfall for NYC for an entire season just based on December we could say IF snowfall at NYC in December is less than 3" seasonal snowfall will be less than 30" IF snowfall at NYC in December is more than 3" seasonal snowfall will be more than 30"?  Maybe we could make the forecast around Thanksgiving which would maximize its accuracy and come up with a list of analogs around that time?

The 3” snowfall marker for December in NYC has only worked with La Niña winters since they are supposed to be front-loaded. It’s not something we can us use in El Niño’s since they usually are back-loaded. But since this year we are getting a February strong -PNA pattern in December, it may or may not be valid. If we can’t make it to 3” before the end of December, that would put us in the below normal category for what we have since the 1990s.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Morning thoughts…

Today will be partly sunny, breezy, and noticeably cooler. High temperatures will likely reach the upper 40s and lower 50s in most of the region. Likely high temperatures around the region include:

New York City (Central Park): 49°

Newark: 52°

Philadelphia: 51°

Normals:

New York City: 30-Year: 45.2°; 15-Year: 45.8°

Newark: 30-Year: 45.7°; 15-Year: 46.5°

Philadelphia: 30-Year: 46.9°; 15-Year: 47.7°

Milder air will begin to return tomorrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SnoSki14 said:

The western trough will be a problem until wavelengths change.

Wouldn't be surprised if March ends up as the coldest/snowiest month. 

Probably. However I am intrigued by the forecasted MJO, and the fact that we are not following a typical La Nina December. I can see a couple of periods before March where we see a few overrunning, changeover events leading to a close to, or normal snowfall winter. 19/20 ended up being fairly close to normal (just a few inches below) with a snowy March. I can see something similar this year.

Looks nothing like a ratter (aka 11/12).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, EastonSN+ said:

Probably. However I am intrigued by the forecasted MJO, and the fact that we are not following a typical La Nina December. I can see a couple of periods before March where we see a few overrunning, changeover events leading to a close to, or normal snowfall winter. 19/20 ended up being fairly close to normal (just a few inches below) with a snowy March. I can see something similar this year.

Looks nothing like a ratter (aka 11/12).

We will be fine with the forecasted nao and AO

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, EastonSN+ said:

Probably. However I am intrigued by the forecasted MJO, and the fact that we are not following a typical La Nina December. I can see a couple of periods before March where we see a few overrunning, changeover events leading to a close to, or normal snowfall winter. 19/20 ended up being fairly close to normal (just a few inches below) with a snowy March. I can see something similar this year.

Looks nothing like a ratter (aka 11/12).

I dont think there was any measureable snow March 2020

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, EastonSN+ said:

Probably. However I am intrigued by the forecasted MJO, and the fact that we are not following a typical La Nina December. I can see a couple of periods before March where we see a few overrunning, changeover events leading to a close to, or normal snowfall winter. 19/20 ended up being fairly close to normal (just a few inches below) with a snowy March. I can see something similar this year.

Looks nothing like a ratter (aka 11/12).

I'd be shocked if this year is even remotely close to something like 11-12. Tropical convection is night and day different from that year. It was stuck the Indian Ocean to Maritime Continent in 11-12. Which is god awful for winter prospects. Remember 19-20 winter? Turns out the ++IOD was a huge problem, in hindsight. 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Getting a favorable Pacific is more important for our area. New England can get by with a -EPO/-PNA/-NAO. But a -PNA trough over the West will push the gradient into New England. 
We will need to eventually flatten out that SE Ridge near the end of the month.

D42EBD99-271B-4344-8F6D-379D05C3444E.thumb.png.34d1c37d4f6d8a93b4e4e72503b54ae5.png
14FFE8E7-DD59-4A3A-A445-50A2C590D611.thumb.png.552fecc8af7cd9fbce81987384e64f54.png

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MJO812 said:

LOL

You are ignoring the pattern on the models

What pattern?  If anyone is ignoring the pattern on the models, it's you.  Just peeking at the ensembles the geps and gefs still have a west coast trough and se ridge at 300+ hrs.  The eps looks a bit chilly at day 10 but a wc trough is about to set up which will pump the se ridge.  

  • Like 1
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Rjay said:

What pattern?  If anyone is ignoring the pattern on the models, it's you.  Just peeking at the ensembles the geps and gefs still have a west coast trough and se ridge at 300+ hrs.  The eps looks a bit chilly at day 10 but a wc trough is about to set up which will pump the se ridge.  

So the other people who think the pattern will get better are ignoring it? 

I have no clue what to tell you if you think this upcoming pattern will be shitty.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Rjay said:

What pattern?  If anyone is ignoring the pattern on the models, it's you.  Just peeking at the ensembles the geps and gefs still have a west coast trough and se ridge at 300+ hrs.  The eps looks a bit chilly at day 10 but a wc trough is about to set up which will pump the se ridge.  

 

3 minutes ago, MJO812 said:

So the other people who think the pattern will get better is ignoring it? LOL at you agreeing with Snowman. 

I have no clue what to tell you if you think this upcoming pattern will be shitty.

But you be you

 

1 minute ago, Stormlover74 said:

How much snow are you expecting in nyc in the next 3 weeks?

Good early afternoon all. No matter what happens, I still hope Karen can get Frosty to the North Pole in time. As always …..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, MJO812 said:

So the other people who think the pattern will get better are ignoring it? 

I have no clue what to tell you if you think this upcoming pattern will be shitty.

 

I didn't say it won't get better.  I'm saying the ensembles still show a pattern that isn't good in their long range. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Rjay said:

What pattern?  If anyone is ignoring the pattern on the models, it's you.  Just peeking at the ensembles the geps and gefs still have a west coast trough and se ridge at 300+ hrs.  The eps looks a bit chilly at day 10 but a wc trough is about to set up which will pump the se ridge.  

I am curious how the tri-state does in such a set-up. There must be a huge gradient between central Jersey, long island up to 84.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, EastonSN+ said:

I am curious how the tri-state does in such a set-up. There must be a huge gradient between central Jersey, long island up to 84.

 

I think the gradient would be north of us but that isn't a detail anyone could really hone in on at this range.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, StormchaserChuck! said:

Yeah it's always going to be negative these days, we have a big Pacific drought, High pressure hitting somewhere over there. I think we can do well snowwise with a -NAO, seems we are due for more precip too. 

You'd need the -nao to press on the se ridge enough to put us on the "good side" of the gradient.  It's possible.  

We really need this wc trough to get out of there.  The stats for 6" or greater snowfalls for NYC in December into early January with a -pna are pretty clear.  It doesn't happen often.  

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...