Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

December 2021


MJO812
 Share

Recommended Posts

The models want to continue the record breaking fall +EPO pattern that we have been discussing. They also are intensifying the the polar vortex and taking the AO and NAO positive. The record +EPO and Pacific Jet seem to be stronger than any of the individual MJO and La Niña composites suggest.

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, bluewave said:

The models want to continue the record breaking fall +EPO pattern that we have been discussing. They also are intensifying the the polar vortex and taking the AO and NAO positive. The record +EPO and Pacific Jet seem to be stronger than any of the individual MJO and La Niña composites suggest. So the MJO composites and December La Niña analogs may not be the best forecast tools to use at this time. There is something bigger going on that past analogs aren’t picking up. Perhaps, it’s the various marine heatwaves occurring that we don’t have analog composites for.

 

 

This is an extremely well coupled La Niña/-PDO/-PMM system in place right now: 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, binbisso said:

Today's teles and MJO forecast  look better than recent days they now have the MJO going into phase 7 And while the AO/NAO trend positive they look to bring it back to neutral.  I know Snowman 19 feels and I agree with him that the MJO will have a tough time getting  into favorable phases, however  I do think that with  The colder temps now established in regions 3 and 1.2 we have a chance to get convection over or near the date line. We shall see

The La Niña driven easterly trades are absolutely roaring up to the dateline. Any MJO wave that tries to propagate into phases 7, 8 is going to get ripped apart and sheared to shreds 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SnoSki14 said:

I would hold off on that until we enter December. Don't like the continued +EPO and strengthening Alaskan vortex. 

Also lack of Atlantic blocking is concerning.

We need whatever help we can get from the NAO. The record cold SST west of Canada are definitely not what we want. It’ll keep trying to build a trough there especially after Dec when climo Nina gets more hostile. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, SnoSki14 said:

I would hold off on that until we enter December. Don't like the continued +EPO and strengthening Alaskan vortex. 

Also lack of Atlantic blocking is concerning.

We said the same thing about early December and there is barely a warmup. We go through being nervous every single winter 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, jm1220 said:

We need whatever help we can get from the NAO. The record cold SST west of Canada are definitely not what we want. It’ll keep trying to build a trough there especially after Dec when climo Nina gets more hostile. 

Yep 2nd half will be key for blocking 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@bluewaveStill a firehose PAC jet in the long range as far as the eye can see. It shows no signs of letting up. It also looks like the +EPO has established a positive feedback loop due to the super cold GOA/severely -PDO and the extremely deep snowpack over all of Alaska. It’s just continuing to manufacture it’s own extreme cold there due to the very heavy snowpack and lack of sun, Alaska is setting all kinds of cold records

  • Haha 1
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, bluewave said:

Looks like the first week of December will be a continuation of the November pattern. The extended guidance wants to develop more of a zonal flow week 2 as the PNA flattens out. But the fast Pacific flow +EPO remains the common denominator. 
 

Nov 29 to Dec 6

E3D97A7C-7487-4ED7-8206-6E9AFB3FA660.jpeg.94aaec89e885aee2be8c8a342aab865c.jpeg

 

Dec 6 to 13


6F8CEE54-AEAB-4A4A-AA14-2C9DEB121EB4.jpeg.0a1498b841cfa3af4abc03ec18dd6d89.jpeg

 

It's hard to take the long range seriously when it keeps changing .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bluewave said:

The EPS weeklies have been very consistent. This forecast issued on November 15th is almost unchanged. So the expectations were always that the November pattern would linger into the first week of December.

November 15th forecast for first week of December lingering November pattern


8D9C9BBA-9807-4CAB-994A-6A4179260007.thumb.png.78926c4d34d40947e2e4293b1d984752.png

They are accurate 2 weeks, weeks 3 and 4 they are not..like basically most long range forecasts past 2 weeks

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, KEITH L.I said:

They are accurate 2 weeks, weeks 3 and 4 they are not..like basically most long range forecasts past 2 weeks

Some years they have remarkable accuracy at 3-6 weeks...others they'll just keep trying to revert to the seasonal climo or expected ENSO pattern and be wrong

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SnowGoose69 said:

Some years they have remarkable accuracy at 3-6 weeks...others they'll just keep trying to revert to the seasonal climo or expected ENSO pattern and be wrong

In my years following the weeklies, many years they would have it cold and snowy Christmas week and it turned out balmy in the 50's. I wouldn't trust it past 2 weeks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MJO812 said:

Dec 5 time-frame keeps popping up

It’s been popping up and that storm is going to cut. No -NAO block to stop it from cutting, no -AO, and the phantom +PNA is going to disappear and flatten out with the PAC jet crashing into it. The GFS, CMC, Euro, GEFS, GEPS, EPS all have it as a cutter and with good reason 

  • Weenie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, snowman19 said:

It’s been popping up and that storm is going to cut. No -NAO block to stop it from cutting, no -AO, and the phantom +PNA is going to disappear and flatten out with the PAC jet crashing into it. The GFS, CMC, Euro, GEFS, GEPS, EPS all have it as a cutter and with good reason 

Wrong

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, EasternLI said:

Yes, what dmillz said. Looks phase 7 ish to me. That has legit potential to ignite a -NAO too. Perhaps phase 8 after? 

434014854_Screenshot_20211122-162157_AdobeAcrobat.thumb.jpg.059e688b69b791eb5ea38d3e0c1a54c8.jpg

How is it going to propagate east into phases 7, 8, 1, with the easterlies screaming from the Niña all the way to the dateline? They are going to shear the wave to shreds: 

 

  • Weenie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, snowman19 said:

How is it going to propagate east into phases 7, 8, 1, with the easterlies screaming from the Niña all the way to the dateline? They are going to shear the wave to shreds: 

East QBO plus La Niña favors eastward propagation of MJO events.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/16742834.2019.1588064

During a La Niña year (Figure 3(c,d)), the effect of the QBO dominates. For each La Niña/QBOE year (Figure 3(c)), there are 1.7 MJO events, which is much larger than that in an El Niño year and La Niña/QBOW year. The last phase has only 0.6 MJO events (Figure 3(d)). During a La Niña/QBOE year, the MJO can propagate to the western Pacific without being suppressed over the Maritime Continent. During a La Niña/QBOW year, the existing MJO is observed to be enhanced over the Indian Ocean, while it is barely able to pass the Maritime Continent (Figure 3(d)).

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, EasternLI said:

East QBO plus La Niña favors eastward propagation of MJO events.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/16742834.2019.1588064

During a La Niña year (Figure 3(c,d)), the effect of the QBO dominates. For each La Niña/QBOE year (Figure 3(c)), there are 1.7 MJO events, which is much larger than that in an El Niño year and La Niña/QBOW year. The last phase has only 0.6 MJO events (Figure 3(d)). During a La Niña/QBOE year, the MJO can propagate to the western Pacific without being suppressed over the Maritime Continent. During a La Niña/QBOW year, the existing MJO is observed to be enhanced over the Indian Ocean, while it is barely able to pass the Maritime Continent (Figure 3(d)).

Interesting counterpoint... good to have this further discussed, if there is any other science.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the mean time???  Maybe I'm wrong, but another climate forecaster pointed out what appears to be a developing stratwarm in nw NAM the next couple of weeks (GEFS).  Is it true?  AND,  the impact on USA weather?  Presuming the same delays here as always at least 2-4 weeks after occurrence (late Dec?).  I am curious. Need something to jar this pattern back to something eventually more favorable for winter (after this -NAO disappears next week). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, wdrag said:

Interesting counterpoint... good to have this further discussed, if there is any other science.

Here's another interesting more recent article. This is focused more solely on the qbo modulation of the MJO - NAO response. Interestingly to me, the reanalysis composites had a more favorable orientation of the -NAO response during EQBO than during WQBO years.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07055900.2021.1944045

The results can be summarized as follows:

MJO Phase 3 in WQBO winters

The observations show a statistically significant positive NAO as do seven of the ten models.

MJO Phase 3 in EQBO winters
The observations show a positive NAO signal, which is not quite large enough to be statistically significant at the 5% level. Only one model shows a statistically significant positive NAO signal.

MJO Phase 7 in WQBO winters
The observations show a negative NAO that is significant at the 5% level. Only one model produces a significant negative NAO.

MJO Phase 7 in EQBO winters
The observations show a negative NAO signal that is not quite large enough to be significant at the 5% level. Four of the ten models produce a negative NAO signal that is significant at the 5% level. It should be noted that the observational signal, while not quite significant, is larger than that of the models with a significant signal, which may be related to sample size and variance.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...