Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

December 2021 Obs/Disco...Dreaming of a White-Weenie Xmas


40/70 Benchmark
 Share

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

the more I look at this.. .it's sort of a weird rare scenario, of having a decent nascent polar air mass, with a mid let wind field running astride/N of the boundary; in fact..it's hard to single out main velocity tube there...it's like throwing vorticity shrapnel along the polar side. 

Anyway, the lengthens the time of maximization of QPF mechanics.   ...uh, snows and or mixes and or rains for a long time - longer than the total velocity of the ambient atmosphere would suggest.  ha.  I mean, typically, we don't see it snow for 15 hours with things moving this fast.

You know what this reminds me of?   Not sure if you were around in 1994... but we started getting into these longish duration events that were also moving fast ( once Xmas was safely behind and ruined... heh).  That circumstance was an oddball super synoptic set up where the NAO was so hugely positive it more in essence ...backed SW, and compressed the flow...  Then disturbances ran up into the fast field and stretched out and by virtue of extension ...events lasted long.  

In a way, this is a strong +AO ...but it too is biased S and is compressing matters. 

Leon 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TauntonBlizzard2013 said:

Does this turning into a coastal a bit on some models help lock on a colder solution for this area?

Most likely with ageo vector from the land not the sea. North of the taint line is where you want to be on WAA but mix in some CCB and it's a win.  But I should let our own Icon answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said:

Even the Euro has the Zeus banana. Deep snow pack in Eastern Canada is always great to build those high pressures.

I'm making my visuals right now....I think its all about how quickly that energy transfers to the coast, which will be determine by how deep the parent system and how pervasive the polar airmass is. We want weaker parent energy and strong, stubborn antecedent polar air mass to induce a faster transfer to truncate the SW flow aloft....THAT is what will change this from a SWFE to a miller B. Could get best of both worlds, too, in the you get a SWFE, that then gives way to a miller B, especially north and east. 12z OP GFS shows this. You can toss the rules regarding how much snow you can get in a SWFE at that point because its no longer a SWFE..its a coastal.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

GFS has that high hanging tough....not even retreating. Character of this event has really changed....PER GFS.

Couple aspect to the GFS that are bucking long trend .. makes it sort of :yikes:

1) ..that high as you noted; typically, those accelerate relative to model run, with a trend to move them off faster. This?  Opposite.  Okay -

2) ..overall systemic potency ( more so since 2010 in all guidance for some reason - I think they got the modeling equiv of COVID) tends to normalize as mid range gets near.   Big events end up middling... middling, something smaller..etc.  

This is three runs in a row where the high is stalled or even back-massed, and that potency is going the other direction. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a lot of guidance being diffuse and OTS is a tacit nod to the GFS scenario because it can be inferred that the parent mechanics will not be that strong...ie ultimately it will transfer sooner...kind of like when the inverse scenario of when the inverted trough shows up on models as just a provisional solution until the model realizes not much will happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Couple aspect to the GFS that are bucking long trend .. makes it sort of :yikes:

1) ..that high as you noted; typically, those accelerate relative to model run, with a trend to move them off faster. This?  Opposite.  Okay -

2) ..overall systemic potency ( more so since 2010 in all guidance for some reason - I think they got the modeling equiv of COVID) tends to normalize as mid range gets near.   Big events end up middling... middling, something smaller..etc.  

This is three runs in a row where the high is stalled or even back-massed, and that potency is going the other direction. 

Yea, I certainly do not buy 1' in Boston....that ageo look is overdone...zero doubt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Yea, I certainly do not buy 1' in Boston....that ageo look is overdone...zero doubt.

I’m giving this another 24-36 hours to see how much north it jumps. Once inside of 72 hours we should narrow the goalposts quite a bit but this is typically the time range when we see some of these things start to trend pretty hard. We didn’t see it much at 12z today. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

I’m giving this another 24-36 hours to see how much north it jumps. Once inside of 72 hours we should narrow the goalposts quite a bit but this is typically the time range when we see some of these things start to trend pretty hard. We didn’t see it much at 12z today. 

I think the most prudent forecast at this juncture is a blended ensemble approach....the lighter GPS/EPS with the more robust GEFS to yield an appreciable moderate event. I have my finger on the trigger for Miller B east, though.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

EPS is really hammering the EPIC-looking negative PNA mid-month. It just torches the central and eastern US because that PNA trough out west goes so deep into southern latitudes. 

Not saying this is the case but isn’t digging and holding troffing west a known euro bias?  Also, eps is most extreme.  GEPS is a good compromise between eps and GEFS.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, George001 said:

Yeah that’s not a good pattern, unfortunately that does make sense with the polar vortex deepening. I’d like to see signs of it weakening before January.

It’s got nothing to do with the vortex.   Do some reading.  Also, most of the time we talk about pv at H5 but are you referring to stratosphere?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

BOX is a bit more bullish than I would expect this far out"

Wednesday...

It appears increasingly likely that interior southern New
England could see its first widespread accumulating snow of the
season. Ensemble model guidance (GFS, EC and GEM) probability of
24 hour 3+ inches of snowfall is now up to at least 40-50% for
Wednesday into Wednesday night across interior MA and CT. Given
how progressive the system is, initial thinking is 3-6 inches of
snow across interior MA and CT, and perhaps an inch or two
along the Boston- Providence corridor. Areas along the coast
probably see mostly if not all rain.

That said, there remains considerable uncertainty on the
placement of the rain/snow line and timing of the heaviest
precipitation as the deterministic guidance differs amongst each
other and with the ensemble guidance. The GFS deterministic run
takes the center of low pressure well inside the 70W/40N
benchmark while the EC is considerably colder. With 925mb temps
starting out at -4 to -6C Wednesday morning, it should be cold
enough to start out as all or mostly snow except for the
immediate coast Wednesday morning. Then the question becomes
whether the cold air has any staying power as the main
precipitation shield moves in. The EC and GEM deterministic
guidance are colder than the GFS. But again, would put more
weight on the ensemble guidance than deterministic guidance. And
the former actually shows more consistency as discussed above.
Still plenty of time to fine tune the specifics.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, weathafella said:

It’s got nothing to do with the vortex.   Do some reading.  Also, most of the time we talk about pv at H5 but are you referring to stratosphere?

And hence the difference between young and inexperienced, and older and wiser LOL. I will venture to Guess that George001 is a younger fellow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...