Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Chargers10
    Newest Member
    Chargers10
    Joined

2021-22 Winter Discussion


Hoosier
 Share

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, schoeppeya said:

Yeah that's the cool thing about the weather, nobody is. If you're going to poo poo his idea at least explain why. 

 

12 hours ago, madwx said:

561 height line going thru Chicago, seems like NW flow and upper 50s, not early winter

substitute upper 50s with upper 30s and that's what this pattern would be in winter,   dry NW flow and not all that cold due to the ridge being pumped up over the plains.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, madwx said:

 

substitute upper 50s with upper 30s and that's what this pattern would be in winter,   dry NW flow and not all that cold due to the ridge being pumped up over the plains.

Yeah upper low swinging down to our east, at best it would be lake effect, but otherwise just crap. I will pass on that look.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, schoeppeya said:

What's a favorable look for clippers for the Lakes versus the depiction we are talking about?

You want the a broader trough that encompasses more of the midwest and less amplitude in the upstream ridge.   I mean this is all a bit too much analysis of one map since patterns are composed of many days to multiple weeks and not just a snapshot of one day.   We need to look at how the entire flow of the NH is evolving.    And wavelengths will be longer by Dec/Jan anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, madwx said:

You want the a broader trough that encompasses more of the midwest and less amplitude in the upstream ridge.   I mean this is all a bit too much analysis of one map since patterns are composed of many days to multiple weeks and not just a snapshot of one day.   We need to look at how the entire flow of the NH is evolving.    And wavelengths will be longer by Dec/Jan anyway.

Exactly, its highest dependent on the Pacific. Negative Epo usually brings it. 

image.jpeg.b517baa9d0128107a789ef7331dec80f.jpeg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, StormfanaticInd said:

Joe Bastardi is one of our greatest minds even though he can be a bit biased 

No, no, and hell no. He's so bad. I don't get why he's so popular among weenies on this forum. Every winter it's like Bastardi said this or Bastardi predicited that. Like who cares? He's never been that good at forecasting to begin with. Plus there's the whole climate change denier thing which just makes him 1000x worse. Like how can you be a weather forecaster and not believe in climate change at this point? I just don't get it.

  • Like 1
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, StormfanaticInd said:

When he doesn't let politics get in the way he has a wealth of knowledge that very few meteorologist have. I agree though. Climate change is very real 

He says cold in the east every year and collects money from stupid people that believe it. He is a snake oil salesman.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, StormfanaticInd said:

When he doesn't let politics get in the way he has a wealth of knowledge that very few meteorologist have. I agree though. Climate change is very real 

Bastardi is an idiot, straight up.

 

There is no "wealth of knowledge" over there, I can assure you of that. 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...