Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,611
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Summer Banter 2021


doncat
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, uncle W said:

7/22...

hottest weeks...

high low mean max ..

98.0 76.9 87.4 102 7/07-7/13 1993

98.4 76.3 87.4 104 7/15-7/21 1977

98.3 76.0 87.1 102 8/29-9/04 1953

95.1 78.9 87.0 .98. 8/05-8/11 1896

95.7 77.9 86.8 104 7/18-7/24 2011

94.6 79.0 86.8 .98. 7/14-7/20 2013

95.3 78.0 86.7 .99. 8/09-8/15 1988

96.6 75.1 85.9 102 8/11-8/17 1944

96.1 75.2 85.7 100 8/01-8/07 1955

95.3 75.9 85.6 103 8/04-8/10 2001

94.9 76.1 85.5 102 7/16-7/22 1980

97.3 73.6 85.4 102 7/17-7/23 1991

95.7 75.1 85.4 .98. 8/28-9/03 1973

94.1 76.7 85.4 .96. 7/12-7/18 1981

94.3 76.4 85.4 103 7/04-7/10 2010

95.4 75.1 85.3 100 7/17-7/23 1955

long live 1993!  wow 1977 was number 1- short hot summer but special in how intense the heat was.

special to see 1953 a close third despite how late in the season that happened and being the longest heatwave on record

do you have a similar list for JFK? I'd expect either 1966 or 2010 to be number 1 there

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, doncat said:

Are people really that confused when they see the word " advisory " lol.

Im always impressed by the lack of understanding regular people have when it comes to weather, let alone NWS terminology. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Rjay said:

NOUS41 KWBC 171700
PNSWSH
Public Information Statement 21-41
National Weather Service Headquarters Silver Spring MD
100 PM EDT Thu Jun 17 2021
To: Subscribers:
 -NOAA Weather Wire Service
 -Emergency Managers Weather Information Network
 -NOAAPORT
 -Other NWS Partners, Users and Employees

From: Eli Jacks, Chief
 NWS Forecast Services Division
Subject: Soliciting Comments through July 31, 2021 on Proposed New 
Headline Language to Replace Current "Advisories" and "Special Weather 
Statements"

As fully detailed in Public Information Statement 21-12 dated March 4, 
2021, the National Weather Service (NWS) will be implementing changes to 
its hazard messaging headlines no earlier than calendar year 2024.

This change will result in the discontinuation of all "Advisory" headlines 
within what is currently the NWS Watch, Warning and Advisory system. Most 
of the current Advisory headlines will be replaced with plain language 
headlines that clearly articulate the nature of the hazard. Current 
"Special Weather Statements" (SPS’) will also be discontinued in favor of 
plain language headlines.
NWS is now collecting public comment on options for the plain language 
that will replace the Advisory and SPS headlines.

The survey is available 
at the following link and will remain open through July 31, 2021:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/HazSimp21

A slide set highlighting public and partner feedback supporting this 
decision and providing case examples demonstrating how the messages will 
change is at this link:
https://www.weather.gov/media/notification/haz_simp_slides.pdf


A set of frequently asked questions with responses as it relates to the 
planned changes is provided here:
https://www.weather.gov/media/notification/haz_simp_faq_sheet.pdf


Additional details on the change may be found on the "Revamp Progress" tab 
of the project website. Detailed reports on the numerous social science-
based engagements may be found in the "Reference Materials" tab: https://www.weather.gov/hazardsimplification/

Questions and comments can be directed to the NWS Hazard Simplification 
Team at:
[email protected]
National Service Change Notices are online at:

 

 

While I do applaud the NWS for trying to simplify their alerts, most of the confusion seems to be Watch vs Warning.

“Watch” ultimately tells me nothing and should really be replaced with “Advisory”, because that’s all it is. “Warning” is obvious and should remain.

In my opinion, “Tornado Advisory” not only sounds better, but it’d give the general public a better understanding of the situation than “Tornado Watch” currently does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Brian5671 said:

these are all generally worthless.  What does the general public do differently if there's a heat advisory vs if there were none?

I wonder if headlines for things like heat aren't more for emergency management than for the general public. Deciding whether to open up municipal cooling centers, etc.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Brian5671 said:

these are all generally worthless.  What does the general public do differently if there's a heat advisory vs if there were none?

i'm not really sure what most of the public does with advisories except buy pallets of bread and milk before it snows 4 inches

  • Like 2
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...