Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,587
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    BarryStantonGBP
    Newest Member
    BarryStantonGBP
    Joined

Winter 2021-2022


40/70 Benchmark
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

No signs of warmings yet and it did take a few punches, but at least this isn't a concentric circle near Santa's fanny. That elongation to the south at least helps a bit. 

 

image.png.06bee7eaf4795a590e2eafe47d193ddf.png

I think it will be stats quo there until it strengthens a good bit around the New Year and beyond.

I think 2007-2008 was like that, just a bit stronger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Lower heights INTVO of AK is going to be a reoccurring theme this season...2011-2012 is a decent, if flawed analog...however, we should have good periods given the drastically different polar domain.

11-12 was ridiculous, you had that massive AK/Bering Sea vortex develop a few days after Thanksgiving and it was lights out right through the end of March. It became a semi-permanent feature and the EPO floodgates were wide open all winter. It was crazy persistent. Kind of hard to believe we would see an anomaly like that again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, snowman19 said:

11-12 was ridiculous, you had that massive AK/Bering Sea vortex develop a few days after Thanksgiving and it was lights out right through the end of March. It became a semi-permanent feature and the EPO floodgates were wide open all winter. It was crazy persistent. Kind of hard to believe we would see an anomaly like that again

I think something like 2005-2006 is much more likely.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have a La Nina winter with a severe -PNA where the core of the low height anomalies is over the PNA region in western Canada, the key to having it still be a very good winter is the WPO region to the west and also not having a hostile Atlantic.

I made a composite below of the "good" La Ninas that had this general PNA pattern:

 

LaNina_severe_negPNA.png

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

If you have a La Nina winter with a severe -PNA where the core of the low height anomalies is over the PNA region in western Canada, the key to having it still be a very good winter is the WPO region to the west and also not having a hostile Atlantic.

I made a composite below of the "good" La Ninas that had this general PNA pattern:

 

LaNina_severe_negPNA.png

 

download.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, snowman19 said:

It’s getting ready to peak, which will probably happen in the next several weeks, the models all had a November/December peak, which fits ENSO climo, most Nino’s and Nina’s peak in that time frame. This event most likely peaks the tail end of this month or early December, that really doesn’t change anything, was expected and is a normal progression 

Honestly I expected it to strengthen and peak mid to late December or so, in my forecast I said I thought it would peak -1.2 to -1.6, I was leaning high end a couple weeks ago but now it looks like the people who were calling for high end weak/low end moderate will be right. That’s kind of a big deal for areas farther south, don’t know about where I live. I have heard earlier peaking ninas are more favorable anyways, I would think by the time winter hits we’re going to be in a full blown Nina pattern due to the lag effect. Everything is lining up for at least a good winter in the Boston area. Whether or not it’s great remains to be seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

It's the block you see in the image I had posted last page. Good poleward block. I don't want that going west or a hostile Atlantic. 

The week 4 map has the WPO block little bit west of ideal, but given the time frame, it’s prob fine for now. You shift that a touch East and we’re in business for December. 

Also, Atlantic doesn’t look terrible...get that a little more blocky and we’d have more wiggle room. 

And goes without saying...things could shift in a less favorable direction too. But most of the guidance is definitely going with the theme of dumping some frigid air into Canada...CFSv2 likes it too...has the higher heights up north further east which is what we’d want.  

image.thumb.png.6af003ea834ed086e55280db590c344f.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

The week 4 map has the WPO block little bit west of ideal, but given the time frame, it’s prob fine for now. You shift that a touch East and we’re in business for December. 

Also, Atlantic doesn’t look terrible...get that a little more blocky and we’d have more wiggle room. 

And goes without saying...things could shift in a less favorable direction too. But most of the guidance is definitely going with the theme of dumping some frigid air into Canada...CFSv2 likes it too...has the higher heights up north further east which is what we’d want.  

image.thumb.png.6af003ea834ed086e55280db590c344f.png

That's great right there. Sign me up for that.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

The week 4 map has the WPO block little bit west of ideal, but given the time frame, it’s prob fine for now. You shift that a touch East and we’re in business for December. 

Also, Atlantic doesn’t look terrible...get that a little more blocky and we’d have more wiggle room. 

And goes without saying...things could shift in a less favorable direction too. But most of the guidance is definitely going with the theme of dumping some frigid air into Canada...CFSv2 likes it too...has the higher heights up north further east which is what we’d want.  

image.thumb.png.6af003ea834ed086e55280db590c344f.png

I would be totally stunned if we had a poor December.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The week 4 map has the WPO block little bit west of ideal, but given the time frame, it’s prob fine for now. You shift that a touch East and we’re in business for December. 
Also, Atlantic doesn’t look terrible...get that a little more blocky and we’d have more wiggle room. 
And goes without saying...things could shift in a less favorable direction too. But most of the guidance is definitely going with the theme of dumping some frigid air into Canada...CFSv2 likes it too...has the higher heights up north further east which is what we’d want.  
image.thumb.png.6af003ea834ed086e55280db590c344f.png

Yup - shift everything 200 nmi east and we’re good. Also would help to have a 50/50 low to lock in cold air. But maybe that doesn’t normally show up yet anyway. Any correlations that anyone has noticed between 50/50 lows and ENSO state?


.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MJOatleast7 said:


Yup - shift everything 200 nmi east and we’re good. Also would help to have a 50/50 low to lock in cold air. But maybe that doesn’t normally show up yet anyway. Any correlations that anyone has noticed between 50/50 lows and ENSO state?


.

Yeah it’s not good yet, but it’s close and if you extrapolate those 2 maps above to later December I would think the pattern becomes great. North Atlantic blocking looks like it is starting to develop there, even with a trough west of ideal that can work. The blocking should help turn those lows initially running inland redevelop off the coast and turn into Miller Bs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That type of pattern would be a high ceiling one on New England, in some of the mid Atlantic boards they cringe at the thought of Miller Bs, but those Miller Bs that screw them over often bury us. It seems like Miller As just don’t have the crazy high ceiling Miller Bs do. Jan 2015, Feb 1978, Feb 2013, Jan 2005 ect all Miller bs.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, George001 said:

That type of pattern would be a high ceiling one on New England, in some of the mid Atlantic boards they cringe at the thought of Miller Bs, but those Miller Bs that screw them over often bury us. It seems like Miller As just don’t have the crazy high ceiling Miller Bs do. Jan 2015, Feb 1978, Feb 2013, Jan 2005 ect all Miller bs.

Most of the Miller B's usually screw anyone from around Philadelphia on south. If you are north of Philly and especially from Central NJ (Monmouth/Mercer County) line on north you usually do pretty well.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...